Welcome to Gaia! ::

I do find Gamespot a little odd in their reviews, but some reviews actually hit the mark, like Advent Rising, the game was trash, therefore their review nailed what Advent Rising was...trash, I did find some of hte reviews a little funny to watch, like the King Kong review and the Bloodrayne 2 review, heck, even when Greg went loco at the end of the Condemned review, but IMO, I think these guys actually sometimes play the games and speak some truth, Gamepro on the other hand, they sometimes get accurate, but seem to be more...well, odd with their reviews, every other major game reviewer gave GRAW 90%-100% great reviews, Gamepro just gave GRAW 360 a mere 4.0, like it was another Xbox title, I read some of their reviews and they focus mainly on the flaws of the game and don't talk much on the beauty of the game, like Unreal Championship 2, the whole review was focused on the problems with UC 2 and not the greatness of the game, but I do go with what Gamespot says sometimes, sometimes my instincts, but that's my opinion

Hold on...if they made a mistake then fixed it, shouldn't the score be a little higher to compensate for their lack of judgement earlier? confused