|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun May 14, 2006 2:28 pm
Hahaha!!! mrgreen I love that!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 15, 2006 9:06 pm
rikuHEART Devin_Kruljac_Truessence I think it should only be legal if the results attribute and benefit non-human animals, where as humans should undergo human animal testing to benefit and attribute to human animals. Indeed you have the right idea! Maybe do the testing on murderer's or something on that order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 16, 2006 4:25 pm
DavidOshi rikuHEART Devin_Kruljac_Truessence I think it should only be legal if the results attribute and benefit non-human animals, where as humans should undergo human animal testing to benefit and attribute to human animals. Indeed you have the right idea! Maybe do the testing on murderers or something on that order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 6:17 pm
rikuHEART DavidOshi rikuHEART Devin_Kruljac_Truessence I think it should only be legal if the results attribute and benefit non-human animals, where as humans should undergo human animal testing to benefit and attribute to human animals. Indeed you have the right idea! Maybe do the testing on murderers or something on that order. That way they also won't be a waste of our tax money!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 7:11 pm
Devin K. Truessence rikuHEART DavidOshi rikuHEART Devin_Kruljac_Truessence I think it should only be legal if the results attribute and benefit non-human animals, where as humans should undergo human animal testing to benefit and attribute to human animals. Indeed you have the right idea! Maybe do the testing on murderers or something on that order. That way they also won't be a waste of our tax money!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:55 am
anyone here have diabetis? statistics say there have to be a few. if not for animal testing, the insulin injections you use would not exist. Ironicly enough, the head honcho up at PETA(I forget her name, don't really care to llearn it either) is a diabetic, and she aknowledges that she ues insulin derived from animal products, and calls it a nescesary evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 5:24 pm
ghstphantom3 anyone here have diabetis? statistics say there have to be a few. if not for animal testing, the insulin injections you use would not exist. Ironicly enough, the head honcho up at PETA(I forget her name, don't really care to llearn it either) is a diabetic, and she aknowledges that she ues insulin derived from animal products, and calls it a nescesary evil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:40 am
I support animal testing in the field of medical science. I has had great succes, and as someone stated; testing on humans would prove inadequet.
Testing has saved many lives. I'm sure that if one of your mothers or loved ones were dying and could be saved by animal testing you wouldn't even hesitate to give the ok. It is not a matter of not caring for animals, but a matter of caring for humans and loved ones. All I think is that those who treat animals cruely need to be punished. But I do support testing 100% in medical cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:31 am
Afalewyn I support animal testing in the field of medical science. I has had great succes, and as someone stated; testing on humans would prove inadequet. Testing has saved many lives. I'm sure that if one of your mothers or loved ones were dying and could be saved by animal testing you wouldn't even hesitate to give the ok. It is not a matter of not caring for animals, but a matter of caring for humans and loved ones. All I think is that those who treat animals cruely need to be punished. But I do support testing 100% in medical cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:05 pm
rikuHEART Afalewyn I support animal testing in the field of medical science. I has had great succes, and as someone stated; testing on humans would prove inadequet. Testing has saved many lives. I'm sure that if one of your mothers or loved ones were dying and could be saved by animal testing you wouldn't even hesitate to give the ok. It is not a matter of not caring for animals, but a matter of caring for humans and loved ones. All I think is that those who treat animals cruely need to be punished. But I do support testing 100% in medical cases. Fully agree with both of you, animal testing for beauty products is totally retarded in my opinion and quite frankly I would respect and enjoy a ladies beauty more if it was natural, not with 20 layers of make-up! I mean come on!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:56 pm
DavidOshi rikuHEART Afalewyn I support animal testing in the field of medical science. I has had great succes, and as someone stated; testing on humans would prove inadequet. Testing has saved many lives. I'm sure that if one of your mothers or loved ones were dying and could be saved by animal testing you wouldn't even hesitate to give the ok. It is not a matter of not caring for animals, but a matter of caring for humans and loved ones. All I think is that those who treat animals cruely need to be punished. But I do support testing 100% in medical cases. Fully agree with both of you, animal testing for beauty products is totally retarded in my opinion and quite frankly I would respect and enjoy a ladies beauty more if it was natural, not with 20 layers of make-up! I mean come on! It is indeed a sad world we live in, my friends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:03 pm
So any ideas on how we can stop the animal testing for beauty products?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
