|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:36 pm
The Unholy Shadow  The only thing I like about those books are the titles.
Ω
Well said, and very true.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:41 pm
The only thing I like about twilight is the nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 11:54 pm
GreenInkling The Unholy Shadow The only thing I like about those books are the titles.
Ω
Well said, and very true.
Well it's true. The titles are rather fitting for vampires... just not sparkly ones. It would be interesting if they were about actual gorey vampires, and the titles had something to do with the contents of the book. Like in "Twilight" for example, it explains the dawning of these vampires (even though Twilight is dusk isn't it? It's the dawn for vampires, anyway). New Moon would probably feature an epic battle with werewolves. Eclipse... something to do with what happens to vampires under an eclipse if anything (up to the writer). Breaking Dawn would be their fall, and Midnight Sun would be their return.
Ω
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 11:15 am
Someone should try writing the books as if they were non-fail. Bella should die at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 3:50 pm
Demoness Crystallia Someone should try writing the books as if they were non-fail. Bella should die at the end. I'd do it but Bella would die at the end of every chapter, even if only because she's constantly having nightmares of herself being murdered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:13 pm
Demoness Crystallia Someone should try writing the books as if they were non-fail. Bella should die at the end.
I'm sooo up to the challenge.
That's just what I need. Another thing to distract me from the real work I have to do. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:16 pm
The Unholy Shadow GreenInkling The Unholy Shadow The only thing I like about those books are the titles.
Ω
Well said, and very true.
Well it's true. The titles are rather fitting for vampires... just not sparkly ones. It would be interesting if they were about actual gorey vampires, and the titles had something to do with the contents of the book. Like in "Twilight" for example, it explains the dawning of these vampires (even though Twilight is dusk isn't it? It's the dawn for vampires, anyway). New Moon would probably feature an epic battle with werewolves. Eclipse... something to do with what happens to vampires under an eclipse if anything (up to the writer). Breaking Dawn would be their fall, and Midnight Sun would be their return.
You know what? You're right! Why h311 are the books titled that when the vampires aren't confined to only coming out at night and the werewolfes aren't confined to transforming during the full moon?!?
That's retarded.
mad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:25 pm
Nara_Neji_02 No matter how well thought out and sound an argument is, it will still fail against Twitards' die-hard stupidity. Logic is beyond their comprehension. I have read and suffered through all 4 books so that I know the enemy and can argue against it. However, if you aren't masochistic enough to read them, you can always search gaia or the world wide web for people who have and have written essay-length arguments on why Twilight sucks. That top paragraph is my life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
