|
|
| Does what I wrote make sense? |
| Yes |
|
80% |
[ 8 ] |
| No |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 12:27 am
Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench to be fair, it should be noted that Colombia is in the Coalition. Why? I said non-contributers...not all nations from... Because I like to give credit where credit is due rather than simply attacking those who don't. Countries in the Americas who are in the Coalition: Colombia Dominican Republic El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua Panama United States
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:16 am
german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench to be fair, it should be noted that Colombia is in the Coalition. Why? I said non-contributers...not all nations from... Because I like to give credit where credit is due rather than simply attacking those who don't. Countries in the Americas who are in the Coalition: Colombia Dominican Republic El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua Panama United States That has no bearing on what I was talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 3:49 pm
Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench to be fair, it should be noted that Colombia is in the Coalition. Why? I said non-contributers...not all nations from... Because I like to give credit where credit is due rather than simply attacking those who don't. Countries in the Americas who are in the Coalition: Colombia Dominican Republic El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua Panama United States That has no bearing on what I was talking about. Why is that relevant? all I was doing was giving credit where credit is due, by showing who is excluded from your statement by being contributors, rather than the much longer list of countries in the Americas who have failed to support us and qualify as noncontributors as you were talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:35 pm
Not that I want to argue semantics, but I'd say I'm pro-action as opposed to pro-war, as I don't feel war in and of itself is a good thing; however, there are times it is necessary and justified. Words only work with those that will listen, and unfortunately there are a great many of people who simply won't. In these cases, actions speak louder than words and peace is promoted through military action.
Occasionally deciding which course of action is appropriate is difficult (and often debatable), but much better than standing around wishing the problem away.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:30 pm
german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench to be fair, it should be noted that Colombia is in the Coalition. Why? I said non-contributers...not all nations from... Because I like to give credit where credit is due rather than simply attacking those who don't. Countries in the Americas who are in the Coalition: Colombia Dominican Republic El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua Panama United States That has no bearing on what I was talking about. Why is that relevant? all I was doing was giving credit where credit is due, by showing who is excluded from your statement by being contributors, rather than the much longer list of countries in the Americas who have failed to support us and qualify as noncontributors as you were talking about. You made it seem like I was making a blanket statement and you decided to name on coalition member. If you had an intention of being fair you would have said something like "For reference the coalition members in South America are:" and then put your entire list instead of saying "To be fair Columbia is in the coalition." Maybe I misinterpreted what you were doing and if I did I am sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:18 pm
Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench Game Phreak Zero german_bar_wench to be fair, it should be noted that Colombia is in the Coalition. Why? I said non-contributers...not all nations from... Because I like to give credit where credit is due rather than simply attacking those who don't. Countries in the Americas who are in the Coalition: Colombia Dominican Republic El Salvador Honduras Nicaragua Panama United States That has no bearing on what I was talking about. Why is that relevant? all I was doing was giving credit where credit is due, by showing who is excluded from your statement by being contributors, rather than the much longer list of countries in the Americas who have failed to support us and qualify as noncontributors as you were talking about. You made it seem like I was making a blanket statement and you decided to name on coalition member. If you had an intention of being fair you would have said something like "For reference the coalition members in South America are:" and then put your entire list instead of saying "To be fair Columbia is in the coalition." Maybe I misinterpreted what you were doing and if I did I am sorry. Yup, you did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
