flyingemu27
My family hasn't received the book, well at least as far as I know. Sounds . . . interesting, but do not let it instantly persuade you. There have been many theories and such like that one. I have heard that Prince Henry(?) is the antichrist, and there is a lot of details and facts that are pretty persuasive . . . at least at first glance. The point is, there can be many facts and little coincidences, but those don't necessarily prove anything.
Personally, the fact that they claim that worship on Sunday is wrong sounds crazy. It sounds more legalistic and religious than Christian.
But perhaps you could fill us in on the details?
You're right. Whenever I read something like this or hear about it, I'm automatically skeptical about it, even if it sounds convincing. I guess you could say I always have my guard up. I don't mean to be paranoid but Jesus did say that even the elite may be led astray.
I was only interested in reading this book because of certain parallels in the Bible the author was referring to. Like this:
End of Chapter 2 -
"Who is this 'beast'? What power -
1). Received its seat from Rome. Revelation 13:4
2.) Rules the world for 1260 years
3.) Received a 'deadly wound' which later heals. Revelation 13:3
4.) Is both a political and a religious power, which is worshiped. Revelation 13:4
5.) Tampered with God's law. Daniel 7:25
6.) Has a leader which claims to be God on the earth and is able to forgive sins (blasphemy). Revelation 13:1
7.) Is a mother church (daughters have come out of her). Revelation 17:5
8.) Made war with the saints. Revelation 13:7
9.) Is a world power which is wondered at. Revelation 13:3, 4
10.) Has "a man" at the head of it with the number of his name being 666. Revelation 13:18
11.) Has a dreaded "mark" which will cause followers to be cast into the lake of fire. Revelation 14:9, 10.
By now, most of the people have guessed that it's the Papacy. They're correct. It's the only power on the face of the earth that fits all the Bible characteristics for it.
But what about 666?"According to the third chapter, the Pope had another name (wiki it and it's there), "Vicarius Filii Dei" which is Latin for "Vicar (Representative) of the Son of God".
Using Roman numerals
V = 5
I = 1
C = 100
A = 0
R = 0
I = 1
U = 5
S = 0
F = 0
I = 1
L = 50
I = 1
I = 1
D = 500
E = 0
I = 1
_____
Total = 666"The earliest extant record of a Protestant writer on this subject is that of Professor Andreas Helwig in 1612. In his work Antichristus Romanus he took fifteen titles in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin and computed their numerical equivalents in those languages, arriving at the number 666." -
Origins of the claim, Wiki pageDuring the beginning of the early Papacy, members would kill and/or torture anybody who had their own Bible and read it. The only ones who could own a Bible and read it to others according to their interpretation were members of the clergy. Not only that, but apparently, they took out the second commandment of not using images and introduced saints and angels into the early church (Butler's catechism). They also shortened the commandment regarding the Sabbath, and changed the day of worship from Saturday to Sunday in order to mimic pagan Sun-worshiping rituals.
According to the final chapters, observing the Sabbath is God's seal and his "new covenant" with humankind, whereas Sunday observance is the Papacy's attempt to "change times and laws" (Daniel 7:25)
"With the end of the great persecutions in the early fourth century, the Church began to make laws on the proper observance of Sunday. Thus in Spain, the bishops legislated that, “If anyone in the city neglects to come to church for three Sundays, let him be excommunicated for a short time so that he may be corrected” (Council of Elvira, 306 A.D.)" -
Source pageOf course, this book clearly states that people who observe Sunday innocently are not condemned, but it does say that those who know the truth and willingly break God's laws anyway are subject to His judgment.
For this reason, I was confused as to what I should do.
I could also choose more examples found in this book, and another one about the Vatican called "The Secret Terrorists" (again using a political cover to hide what's actually in the book). Apparently, the 1260 year reign (538 A.D. - 1798 A.D.) of the Papacy is mentioned 7 times in the Bible: Daniel 7:25, Daniel 12:7, Revelation 11:2, Revelation 11:3, Revelation 12:6, Revelation 12:14, and Revelation 13:5 and the reason why this author calls Sunday observance "the mark of the Beast" is because of something he read that verified, word-for-word, what was said in Daniel 7:25:
“The Pope has the power to change times, to abrogate laws, and to dispense with all things, even the precepts of Christ.” “The Pope has the authority and often exercised it, to dispense with the command of Christ.” Decretal, de Tranlatic Episcop. Cap. (The Pope can modify divine law.) Ferraris’ Ecclesiastical Dictionary. -
Vatican Claims Power To Change God’s LawsMore from that page (also found in the two books I mentioned):
“Is not every Christian obliged to sanctify Sunday and to abstain on that day from unnecessary servile work? Is not the observance of this law among the most prominent of our sacred duties? But you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify.” -James Cardinal Gibbons, The Faith of Our Fathers (1917 ed.), pp. 72, 73.
“The Catholic church,” declared Cardinal Gibbons, “by virtue of her divine mission changed the day from Saturday to Sunday.” Catholic Mirror Sept. 23 1983. (Official organ of Cardinal Gibbons)
Supposedly, Sunday worship is the "mark" because: "[The act of changing the day of worship] is a
mark of her ecclesiastical power and authority in religious matters." - Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons
And the reason why Sabbath observance is a seal is because: "A seal has three parts: 1.) The name of the ruler. 2.) The ruler's title. 3.) The territory over which he rules.
The fourth commandment regarding the Sabbath contains these 1.) Name "the Lord." 2.) Title "thy God" (Creator) 3.) His territory "heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is." "
It sounds like it makes sense, yet someone else says:
"There are no requirements, other than the acceptance of Jesus Christ as Savior, for receiving the Seal of God!"
"Christians that meet for worship on Sunday are not worshiping the Beast of Revelation, nor are they worshiping the sun god, but our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ." -
http://www.truthorfables.comYou can see why I'm scratching my head here. So which one is God's Seal? Is it respecting God's mandates by observing the Sabbath the way the fourth commandment tells us, or should we ignore that and just accept Jesus, no matter what day you've chosen for worship? Or is it both? O_O
I still can't figure out if it's true or not.