|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 5:39 pm
i think people would lose the left arm seeing as lots of people are right handed on the other hand technology is quite amazing so they could probally make you a prosthetic(however you spell it) leg
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:22 am
I can't really decide. Whichever way I go, I'm crippled. It doesn't matter so much to me, I guess. I like walking though, so legs are out. What if you're already blind as a bat? neutral Do you still have to post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:40 pm
I guess my left leg. They have those fake legs now so probably my left leg..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:30 pm
i guess without the ability to talk or see... so i don't have to watch as the world slowly destroys itself and i will never be lured by the outer beauty of things... that should help protect me against lust.Not being able to talk should mean i wont be able to hurt anyone ever again with my harsh words ... yes my life will be destroyed that way since i wish to be in a profession where talking will be of the essence.but if i am forced to then i don't know maybe that would be it... i wouldn't want to lose any sense or organ willingly thought :XP: ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 2:43 pm
Well, I'm a very right dominant person, so my right arm and leg stay. But, I balance all my weight on my left side, and hold things still with my left hand, so they stay. And I walk a hell of a lot, especially in woody territories, so I'd need my legs and hands. I enjoy being able to talk, because I like getting my point across, and there are certain times when talking is a nice things. Besides, I'm a sarcastic, cynical wit, and sign language can't express that point as well. not to mention that most of the people I know understand sign language..... and seeing things... well, I'm visual. I need to see things. And, much like talking, seeing is one of those things you'd like to have under certain circumstances... So, in layman's terms, none of the above, pls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:03 pm
I would have to go with the ability too see and talk. I figure that I can still hear what is going on around me and I could learn to read brail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 7:33 pm
Man this one was hard. I don't want to lose my arms because then I don't get to show off my ambidextriousity... legs not so much, I could always get one of them prostetic ones or a wheel chair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:16 am
I'd rather not see and talk. I've seen all I want from this world and I'd prefer not to talk anymore, it only gets me in trouble. I'm serious it does, I'm surprise that I'm not fired from my job yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
