|
|
| Is dumbledork really dead? |
| yes |
|
78% |
[ 11 ] |
| no |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
| poll ho |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:11 pm
rolandthegreat malfoy sucks....... 
... *sniggers*
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:12 am
The Fluff Snape is too important of a character to die.
And Dumbledore would never have killed him.
He said in the 5th book he doesn't kill because he believes there are things much worse then death. The only reason he would kill Snape is if he found out what Snape was doing, but then he probably would settle for just killling him... And even then, Snape wouldn't put up with that. Snape may be too important a charecter to die but i would think Dumbledore is a highly important charecter himself. I mean he was the last person that would belive half the things Harry say besides Ron and Hermione. Harry needs Dumbledore more than I think he even needed Sirius. Dumbledore was supposed to help Harry on his quest for the horcruxs, I dont think he would have died and left harry entirely alone like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 3:42 pm
i don''t really care if dumbledork comes back or not he was a using old b*****d in my opinion and i have to wonder if he is really dead my librarian is on our high school debate team and she nearly went wacko when we all agreed that dumbledore was dead. Soo i was just posting to see if some one can really prove a point that dumbledork is dead
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:45 pm
He is. I think JK killed Sirius and Albus for a reason. And, that reason will be known in the seventh and FINAL book. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:56 pm
aken-vampire-king The Fluff Snape is too important of a character to die.
And Dumbledore would never have killed him.
He said in the 5th book he doesn't kill because he believes there are things much worse then death. The only reason he would kill Snape is if he found out what Snape was doing, but then he probably would settle for just killling him... And even then, Snape wouldn't put up with that. Snape may be too important a charecter to die but i would think Dumbledore is a highly important charecter himself. I mean he was the last person that would belive half the things Harry say besides Ron and Hermione. Harry needs Dumbledore more than I think he even needed Sirius. Dumbledore was supposed to help Harry on his quest for the horcruxs, I dont think he would have died and left harry entirely alone like that.
By killing off Sirius and Dumbledore, Jo just got rid of Harry's two main babysitters.
And Dumbledore know's Harry's not alone. He know's Harry's got all is friends that would never dream of leaving him alone to fight Voldy. They may not make it to him at the end when he really needs them, but that won't mean they didn't try their hardest to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:09 pm
Dumbledore is dead. Thats it. End of story.
Sirius, I have no hope for, but Im going to pretend to anyways.
And Snape is innocent. Well, I do believe he killed Dumbledore, but not for reasons most would think.
Snape is my favourite... heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
