|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:21 pm
Yes, it was quite entertaining. I'm always up for a debate.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:43 pm
Homigwtf. Poppet. So what? He's good at one charm. Did deal. It even said in the book that was really all he was good at. I'm sure not everyone could do what he did but that doesn't make him smart. That makes him cunning. I still think he's a moron. He wouldn't fit into the ravenclaws. I agree. I think that the reason why he would do those memory charms was out of panic. Not wit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:01 pm
BahamutIIX Not entirely true. He was clever enough to be able to market his books and keep the people that knew the truth at bay. He may not be super smart, but he was good enough to run around like that for a fair amount of time, not being noticed by anyone. I'm pretty sure he was quite a smart fellow, until he turned arrogant by the attention he was recieving. I only think that he is smart, because he has to know the facts from his books. The only reason why he passed off his books without people noticing, was because he was gifted in memory charms, a good liar, and was so full of it in interviews, that he would have to memorize his books for people to believe him! I don't know what house he would be in!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:56 pm
Unfortunately, he does look like a Slytherin. But I don't want him to be the face of what we're all like.
I'm not an insensitive, obnoxious prat!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 11:35 pm
I have to say that it makes since that Lockhart being a Slytherin. I mean he even has the attitude for being a Slytherin. I mean who else believes they're above all, and the best person on earth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:37 pm
Sure I guess Gilderoy Lockhart COULD be in Slytherin. He is (or was suppose to be) handsome, which all Slytherins are. And you could say he was witty. I mean, he did fool the whole wizard community.
BUT, his secret ambition is to rid the world of evil and market his own line of hair-care products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:59 pm
Well Kim, since you're a Slytherin of course you want to compliment Slytherins' good looks. I'll agree with you in the cases of the Malfoys and Blacks, but Pansy Parkinson and Draco's fat cronies? Ew!
Gilderoy is definitely not a HufflePuff or Gryffindor. I understand the arguments for both Ravenclaw and Slytherin. I'll have to say he's a...hmm...Slytherin, yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:28 pm
And Milicent, for some reason I remember her looking like a box? And Marcus Flint, the boy who looked like a troll. But the Malfoys and Blacks were defiantly not ugly. And to quote the genius of Draco and the Malfoys "Oh Pansy, you are the girl of my dreams. Because all the other girls in Slytherin are fugly. I like you, I hope you like me too. Because your the only okay looking girl in Slytherin." Sweet.
I would say Lockhart is a Slytherin as well. He had one thing he was good at and he exploited it for his own personal gain, destroying people who would get in his way by altering their memories. And he was more than willing to let innocent bystanders die to protect himself when his true character was in threat of being discovered. But I think he must have been a bit corrupt by power, because when we meet up with him again in OotP, he is just rather childish and, for want of a better word, pleasant. But that may just be a side effect of the memory charm and not a true representation of his character before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:57 pm
True, they are ugly. And so is Pansy...but Tom Riddle was mighty fine looking. But I GUESS he would most likely have been in Slytherin. I tried to find out what house he was in, and if she made any reference to it, but I haven't found anything. I like to think that he didn't go to Hogwarts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
