I am an ordained minister. I became ordained by filling out a form on the
Universal Life Church website two years ago. However, I have never performed any ministerial deeds, other than offering spiritual advice and leading a simple ritual or two. I've never officiated at a wedding, even though I was asked to once.
The reason I didn't do the wedding was because I wasn't sure whether or not it would have been seen as valid. It seems that since more and more people are becoming ministers over the internet, several states are becoming more wary about the signature on the certificate. In some states, weddings performed by internet ministers aren't even valid. This can lead to trouble years down the line when someone tries to collect life insurance or social security payments.
The commonly accepted guidelines for ordaining a minister are that one must be ordained by someone who is already an established minister, and that one must be a leader of an established congregation that meets regularly. The Universal Life Church offers ordination to anyone, whether they meet these guidelines or not, because they believe in total religious freedom, and that anyone should be able to make important religions decisions for themselves.
The question at hand seems to be one of separation of Church and State. The only ministerial duty that has laws governing it is that of marriage. In the eyes of many, marriage is a very spiritual occasion, though for the most part, marriage laws are not disputed. In case someone wants to be married by a minister ordained online, the Universal Life Church has posted a list of state marriage laws
here.
What are your views on internet ministers? What are your views on marriage laws? Should an internet minister be able to perform a legal wedding?