|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:39 pm
Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:40 pm
One day, I'll make a topic that doesn't get deleted/locked/start loud and blazing rows. Ah, who am I kidding?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:41 pm
Indigo Project Jaft "Chi-chik." *Jaft busts out his Mod Rifle* KILL IT! *ducks out of thread* aw come on guys... we don't have to delete his topic sad we can just start over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:41 pm
Ascott Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand... ... says the world was created in 7 days. Where did those thousands of years of evolution you speak of come from? stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jafthasleftthebuilding Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:43 pm
Who said anything about deleting or locking?
I'm just waiting. The hesistation is due to me learning quite a bit in the beginning of this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:43 pm
Indigo Project Ascott Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand... ... says the world was created in 7 days. Where did those thousands of years of evolution you speak of come from? stare Anyone who believes in verbal inerrancy is completely certifiable. I'm more worried about the two seperate creation myths in the book of genesis than I am the inaccuracies of one of them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:44 pm
eek
*screams and flails arms in air*
STOPPPPP FIGHTINGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!
*hyperventalates* *twitch*
mmk.... just... *sigh* lets just TRY to leave the hostility behind, neh? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:44 pm
Jaft Who said anything about deleting or locking? I'm just waiting. The hesistation is due to me learning quite a bit in the beginning of this thread. Sorry. I leap to conclusions when moderators are in my topics ¬_¬. I think we've all learned something today. And in the end, isn't that what really matters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jafthasleftthebuilding Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:45 pm
Ascott Jaft Who said anything about deleting or locking? I'm just waiting. The hesistation is due to me learning quite a bit in the beginning of this thread. Sorry. I leap to conclusions when moderators are in my topics ¬_¬. I think we've all learned something today. And in the end, isn't that what really matters? Atoms and electrons too bro.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Ascott Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand... That isn't the point. What I was saying was that you do not have the right to tell someone what religion they follow. If sanzo believes in the Catholic principles and calls herself Catholic, she's catholic. end of story. Now, I'm going to try for the third time to get you to answermy question. Acoording to you we are above animals and therefore have the right to do whatever we want. Does this give us the right to be cruel to animals?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:47 pm
Jaft Ascott Jaft Who said anything about deleting or locking? I'm just waiting. The hesistation is due to me learning quite a bit in the beginning of this thread. Sorry. I leap to conclusions when moderators are in my topics ¬_¬. I think we've all learned something today. And in the end, isn't that what really matters? Atoms and electrons too bro. They're of secondary importance, I find. Right, I'm off to bed. If you don't mind leaving this topic unlocked, it'd be interesting to see what, if anything, other people have to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:47 pm
Ascott Indigo Project Ascott Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand... ... says the world was created in 7 days. Where did those thousands of years of evolution you speak of come from? stare Anyone who believes in verbal inerrancy is completely certifiable. I'm more worried about the two seperate creation myths in the book of genesis than I am the inaccuracies of one of them. I'm just trying to make my own point. You yourself said that religion does not bend to suit people. You either believe and follow it, or you don't. Live by your own words, or stop picking on others. That's it. I'm done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:48 pm
Ascott Anyone who believes in verbal inerrancy is completely certifiable. okokokok...BELIEFS!!!! now obviously many of these will be hard to change. 3nodding so why can't we all just express them peacefully? smile *feels like a hippy now sweatdrop * ...and way to sound like an afterschool special man xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:48 pm
Ascott Jaft Who said anything about deleting or locking? I'm just waiting. The hesistation is due to me learning quite a bit in the beginning of this thread. Sorry. I leap to conclusions when moderators are in my topics ¬_¬. ... Um, you did know that Sanzo is a mod, right? sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 6:50 pm
Celestial Burden Ascott Celestial Burden ~lizzerde~ why is it that religon is always sucked into heated discussions? confused i mean i know it's a legitimate discussion point here... but the way it's been discussed has had almost no relation to the topic of foods people choose not to eat. confused maybe i'm blind to it. but i don't see any relevance of the heated arguments on religious aspects to food. No, Lizz, you're right. They way the discussion was carried on was completely irrelevent to the topic. I made a point about my religion stating why some witches were vegtarians, that's it. however, when he started telling sanzo what religion she could and could not follow he took things too far I think. I really don't think there is much left to discuss here. If you'll notice, I took great care not to debate your religion with you. My religion, on the other hand... That isn't the point. What I was saying was that you do not have the right to tell someone what religion they follow. If sanzo believes in the Catholic principles and calls herself Catholic, she's catholic. end of story. Now, I'm going to try for the third time to get you to answermy question. Acoording to you we are above animals and therefore have the right to do whatever we want. Does this give us the right to be cruel to animals? All the principles. Picking and choosing the ones she likes is a bastardisation of the religion. If she follows all of them, she's Catholic. There's nothing more to it. Yes, technically, humans have the right to be cruel to animals, if they're so inclined. Luckily, I also have the right to stop anyone I see being cruel to an animals. Which I would utilise to the fullest extent. In that situation, whichever one of us "won" the ensuing conflict would continue to enjoy his rights uninterrupted. Right, I really am going to bed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
