|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:36 am
=P You should convert to Firefox. It rocks XD
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:05 pm
That... is what I am using. Have been using Firefox for about 2 years. Though, just recently updated to that 2.0.6 version...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:37 am
"awesomenesses"
Ah, i see why that's being recognised. That says Awesomeness-es. Like, more than one....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:49 pm
Yes, but is it truly a real word? I wonder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:34 am
I suppose Firefox is going by basic english laws, like Awesome being the word, Awesomeness - as in...well, I cant explain it but you get it, and then adding -es to it to turn it plural. put together, according to english, it can be a word.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:21 am
Or an imaginary made up word, that sounds like it should be a real word. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:17 pm
How else would awesome be a noun? But I guess this is what Dictionary.com is for. blaugh Quote: Awe · some: 1. inspiring awe: an awesome sight. (and two other definitions) Related forms: Awe · some · ly Awe · some · ness Wow! Whaddayaknow. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:20 pm
Awesomenesses is a bad use of grammar,correct, but bad nonetheless. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Le Duke of Undertaker Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:47 pm
That is just strange if it's a real word. It just... shows how much we as a society have fallen. Oh well. What do I know?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:25 am
It shows how much we have expanded 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:04 am
How much we've changed. I guess the word "awesomeness" being in the dictionary can be good or bad, depending on your perspective. The grammar b***h Awesomenesses is a bad use of grammar The silly WoO It shows how much we have expanded
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:31 pm
I really think I'm with the Duke on this one. It's just a really bad use of grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:05 pm
Legit, but not recommended. Kind of like that new Dibs ice cream. So delicous, but has about 99% of your daily recommended fat value. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:17 am
rofl Haha. You actually look at those? I think "Mmm, tasty *munch**munch* domokun "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:43 pm
I could go for some s'mores right now. Oooh, or cappuccino cinnamon ice cream. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
