|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:46 am
I think it was lost under all the unofficial jams.
I'll ask the boss tonight after work.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 5:16 pm
Okay sports fans! I haven't spoken to her, but here's my VERY VERY late entry! whee  or, for those of you who prefer to see the avatar dummies somewhere in the design: 
what do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 6:34 pm
Vorty Okay sports fans! I haven't spoken to her, but here's my VERY VERY late entry! whee IMAGE (cause I'm right underneath whatI'm replying too!) or, for those of you who prefer to see the avatar dummies somewhere in the design: IMAGE what do you think? I like/love it! The dummies, though... their lighter outlines are a bit too jagged to fit with the gorgeous smoothness of the rest of the banner. Also, if you don't think me too rash, the slanted text seems a bit off (a little sea-sicky to me...) - possibly too extreme of a slant? Don't hate me! sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 7:17 pm
Don't be afraid of your comments, STK. Where's the sense in that?
I think he meant a dotted outline-like stitch marks. wink
I have to say that I prefer it without the silouettes, and the slant-though offsetting at first-grows on me the more I look at it.
Cracker-jack job!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 7:28 pm
I could never hate you stk! you are super-duper! whee
And thank YOU Merci! I'm glad you spotted the stitches, but maybe they are a bit poorly created.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 7:49 pm
Vorty I could never hate you stk! you are super-duper! whee And thank YOU Merci! I'm glad you spotted the stitches, but maybe they are a bit poorly created. Ahhh... stitches... I can see them now... have to look really closely. I don't think they're poorly created - actually, the more I look at them the better they get! I think my monitor's playing tricks on me - could have sworn the stiches were a lot lighter than that! gonk Heh.. Mercy - the text had an opposite effect on me, I liked it at the slant at first, then it started to bug me... I dunno.. my brain's wired funny. (yay! I'm super-duper!)To tell the truth, if you were to go with the sans-shadow/dummies version, I would suggest shortening the fabric a little bit (a tad).. then again I'm an OC picky person and I think I'm butting in a bit too much ( gonk 's ----> self).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 8:14 pm
I actually think you're wrong there.
If I shortened the fabric, I'd lose all that opportunity to make it flowy and sweet. It would look squat and un-appealing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 9:13 pm
Can you make the top of the banner, to use your own words, a bit more "crisp?"
The smudgey-fuzzy look it has now isn't Classic Vorty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:21 pm
Vorty I actually think you're wrong there. If I shortened the fabric, I'd lose all that opportunity to make it flowy and sweet. It would look squat and un-appealing. Heh... true. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 8:53 am
As long as we're making things for the guild, we need a mascot exclaim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 12:53 pm
Potto The Magnificent As long as we're making things for the guild, we need a mascot exclaim but we already have one... ...THEQUALITYOFMERCY! She's everything an adorable mascot should be! blaugh Mercy: Say what? I can't see the fuzzies, where abouts do you mean? The outline of the top of the flag is clear enough to me, but do you mean the shading?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 1:38 pm
Potto The Magnificent Here are my submissions for the uniform part:   I'm not expecting to win or anything, but it wont hurt to give it a short blaugh Wow, these are my favourites. Good work Potto! I'll see what I can make for the banner... [Edit] I placed my avatar there, because I can no one else to put but maybe we can put in a uniformed couple or something? Anyways, how about this:  [/Edit]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:05 pm
I think perhaps that's a tad too small.
The banner is for the Guild Homepage, so it needs to be quite large
that banner is awe-inspiring, though. Well done ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 4:34 pm
Vorty I actually think you're wrong there. If I shortened the fabric, I'd lose all that opportunity to make it flowy and sweet. It would look squat and un-appealing. like mine you mean? gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2004 5:01 pm
Vorty Potto The Magnificent As long as we're making things for the guild, we need a mascot exclaim but we already have one... ...THEQUALITYOFMERCY! She's everything an adorable mascot should be! blaugh Mercy: Say what? I can't see the fuzzies, where abouts do you mean? The outline of the top of the flag is clear enough to me, but do you mean the shading? What? But... but... I'm a cute little ferret! crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
