|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:30 am
of course the Katana fleet was modified. It was the first wholy slaved fleet. each ship's computer was slaved to the leader and much of the systems were heavily modifie so the ships woulnt be so crew dependant. when they vanished, the idea behind slaving ships together and heavily automated ships went right out the window, leading to the ridiculous crew complements aboard Star Destroyers.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 1:09 am
Cale Darksun of course the Katana fleet was modified. It was the first wholy slaved fleet. each ship's computer was slaved to the leader and much of the systems were heavily modifie so the ships woulnt be so crew dependant. when they vanished, the idea behind slaving ships together and heavily automated ships went right out the window, leading to the ridiculous crew complements aboard Star Destroyers. mhm so no one would go loosing fleets of battleships again. xp Also on a side note two interesting things I want to learn more about. Vong Hunter Killer Droids this is something interesting, is it the New Republic's own version of Droidekas? And Spacetroopers are a new variant I never heard of until re-reading the Thrawn books, damn even after the fleet pulled out 6 of the 8 were hunted down and killed and 2 others crippled a Corellian Corvete xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 12:54 pm
Robin the Aussie Cale Darksun of course the Katana fleet was modified. It was the first wholy slaved fleet. each ship's computer was slaved to the leader and much of the systems were heavily modifie so the ships woulnt be so crew dependant. when they vanished, the idea behind slaving ships together and heavily automated ships went right out the window, leading to the ridiculous crew complements aboard Star Destroyers. mhm so no one would go loosing fleets of battleships again. xp Also on a side note two interesting things I want to learn more about. Vong Hunter Killer Droids this is something interesting, is it the New Republic's own version of Droidekas? And Spacetroopers are a new variant I never heard of until re-reading the Thrawn books, damn even after the fleet pulled out 6 of the 8 were hunted down and killed and 2 others crippled a Corellian Corvete xp YV droids were indeed surprising to me, since they very much remind me of droidekas. But they were sure effective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 1:05 am
I kind of like Spacetroopers more, why need TIE Fighters in some cases just launch a squad of space troopers and they'ld wreck some of the enemy fleet in moments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 11:25 am
Because TIEs are cheap as dirt.
Trianing a spacetrooper, buying armor/repulsorpack, maintenance, paying the trooper, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 2:41 pm
Ah yes it's all about costs, for the Empire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:52 am
Or rather you mean the Empire was in general.
But some people did not mind putting money aside to develop new weapons or super weapons or build new Super Star Destroyers every now and then. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 1:27 pm
The money system in SW is very ******** up.
20,000 bounty on Solo, a so called public enemy.
And a TIE costs 30K. and in KOTOR a good assault firfle costs 1K.
So, thats like sayign that I could trade 30 AK-47s for a fighter jet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 3:46 pm
FrozenPhoenix32 The money system in SW is very ******** up. 20,000 bounty on Solo, a so called public enemy. And a TIE costs 30K. and in KOTOR a good assault firfle costs 1K. So, thats like sayign that I could trade 30 AK-47s for a fighter jet? Keep in mind different points of time, would mean different equivalents like in today for example $1 not worth as much as it would've been say 10 years or so back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 6:29 pm
Yeah but if technology has not significantly grown in 25,000 years I doubt that inflation will rise like that in like 10 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:48 pm
were v wings later remodled into the tie fighter????? question
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 9:55 pm
FrozenPhoenix32 Yeah but if technology has not significantly grown in 25,000 years I doubt that inflation will rise like that in like 10 years. In 25,000 years you're denying ANY chance of inflation effecting prices. Considering all the various wars/conflicts. I'ld say there could very well be a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 11:44 pm
in 25K years, yes.
Not in 10.
Either way it's a mess up in continuity, thats all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 9:47 pm
FrozenPhoenix32 in 25K years, yes. Not in 10. Either way it's a mess up in continuity, thats all. Mhm, now that makes better sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
