|
|
| Do you think this idea HAS any merit? With or without some adjustment? |
| Yes |
|
60% |
[ 17 ] |
| No |
|
39% |
[ 11 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:11 am
 I say no. Everyone has said what needs to be said. And I hate it when we don't know who's mule you are. That just means we wouldn't listen to you before.
You sound like DeGei to me, but I don't know if he posted in this thread or not. You just seem to act like DeGei.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 6:32 am
i agree with christa, even if we move to another guild it wouldn't feel right, zae's the one who did all of this for us to have fun and we're moving to another guild just because we can't wait for another update? it's really unfair, she has a life outside the computer too
and i know that you were thinking about us too but please understand that we don't want to leave zae ;_;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:11 am
angelchii i agree with christa, even if we move to another guild it wouldn't feel right, zae's the one who did all of this for us to have fun and we're moving to another guild just because we can't wait for another update? it's really unfair, she has a life outside the computer too
and i know that you were thinking about us too but please understand that we don't want to leave zae ;_; confused Zae already left us. We would be leaving no one.
I think having a guild -just- for the game could work. I mean we could do everything else in here, gm apps, discussions about new ideas for games, and all that could stay in the Main forum. But the actual game itself could go in the new guild. It would just be convenient. That why the GM could sticky and all that stuff, and it would be useful. And if we wanted punishments for flaming and stuff that goes on in the D we could kick them out of the game guild.
The only problem is that could kill the game. I mean, already half the guild doesnt seem to post in the main, and just stays in D. The number would probably drastically increase if the game was in a whole other guild. Out of sight, out of mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:52 pm
I will concede the point that having the "game" in a guild where vc's and mods and whatnot can be put in power is beneficial... Maybe not as beneficial as many would think, but still, beneficial nonetheless...
However, something like this should include the majority of the guild... or else there will be many who will no longer participate, which would be sad.
But, the idea of the "new" guild being transferred to someone we know and trust interests me. If not only for the fact that a well-liked/respected individual here probably could keep everyone together...
If we can keep the guild together and alive, then everything is good. Heck, such an act, keeping the guild active, and making things better sounds like something that would make Zae happy... o.o
But, again, we need to keep everyone on the bandwagon, or else things are gonna be goofed...
So, if there's enough people willing to move to the new guild, you have my approval, However, I will vehemently disagree with moving UNTIL that is a reality, or at least close.
And one more thing... Has anyone thought of picking someone we all like, donating money, and asking Zae if she'd be willing to give the guild to them, and give us a shot of running things while she is not active? I mean, if there's a way we can contact her for the time being?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 7:56 pm
For the record Im not behind this, I dont have time to backread the whole thing. I agree with ROWS, we should elect a temp leader to handle things, we dont need a new guild and we dont need to in anyway act in a manner that may offend Zae.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:10 pm
Well, after one day it's 10 yes and 9 no, a tight competition. I wonder what would happen if it were left to run for a week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 9:56 am
Wow, a tie...
Well, I didn't expect that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:17 pm
14-10 with the Yeas in the lead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:20 pm
.+:{}:+.
But polls can be mule voted.
And you asked 'Does it have any merit?'
The idea can have merit but that doesnt mean people like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:21 pm
Merumiharu .+:{}:+.
But polls can be mule voted.
And you asked 'Does it have any merit?'
The idea can have merit but that doesnt mean people like it. Oh so let me get this straight. No matter what the result, it will be invalid because we're going to be paranoid? -.-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 4:25 pm
.+:{}:+.
Dukes. Do we speak the same language? Was that not in english? Because the only way I can think you got that out of my post was if you translated it wrong.
Holyshit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:00 pm
Dukes Merumiharu .+:{}:+.
But polls can be mule voted.
And you asked 'Does it have any merit?'
The idea can have merit but that doesnt mean people like it. Oh so let me get this straight. No matter what the result, it will be invalid because we're going to be paranoid? -.- Exactly.... Polls for important stuff = phayl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:09 pm
Would it make you feel better if people had to post their answer? If they answer yes they have to tell what kind of merit it has and how to improve it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
