|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:39 am
My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow rolleyes Ever taken a psych class? yes Self awareness is realzing that it's YOU in the mirror and not another person on the other side of the glass. So to someone with no self awareness, they think it's another human being separeted by glass; and thus are not alone. BUT, to an outsider looking in, they realize that that person is seeing their own reflection. yes, i know this... i dont see how it relates to a pop song from the 60s, though *facepalm* Wow Mike, Wow. well, if two can be as bad as one... it seems like your hypothetical man is gonna be lonely either way
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:46 am
MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow rolleyes Ever taken a psych class? yes Self awareness is realzing that it's YOU in the mirror and not another person on the other side of the glass. So to someone with no self awareness, they think it's another human being separeted by glass; and thus are not alone. BUT, to an outsider looking in, they realize that that person is seeing their own reflection. yes, i know this... i dont see how it relates to a pop song from the 60s, though *facepalm* Wow Mike, Wow. well, if two can be as bad as one... it seems like your hypothetical man is gonna be lonely either way Sexist Pig.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:02 am
My Hollow Okay ponder this: What if one has no self-awareness and looks in the mirror. For that person they are not alone, but for an outsider that person is. So: if you are there with your reflection with no outside party looking on, AND you don't have self-awareness, are you really the number one? you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:32 am
MegaTherion777 My Hollow Okay ponder this: What if one has no self-awareness and looks in the mirror. For that person they are not alone, but for an outsider that person is. So: if you are there with your reflection with no outside party looking on, AND you don't have self-awareness, are you really the number one? you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:38 am
My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow Okay ponder this: What if one has no self-awareness and looks in the mirror. For that person they are not alone, but for an outsider that person is. So: if you are there with your reflection with no outside party looking on, AND you don't have self-awareness, are you really the number one? you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:39 am
MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow Okay ponder this: What if one has no self-awareness and looks in the mirror. For that person they are not alone, but for an outsider that person is. So: if you are there with your reflection with no outside party looking on, AND you don't have self-awareness, are you really the number one? you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:43 am
My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow Okay ponder this: What if one has no self-awareness and looks in the mirror. For that person they are not alone, but for an outsider that person is. So: if you are there with your reflection with no outside party looking on, AND you don't have self-awareness, are you really the number one? you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:53 am
MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:06 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:16 am
kacisko MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister! lol When will it end?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:27 pm
kacisko MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister! rofl
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:41 pm
kacisko MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 you referring to the listener. in this case the listener is me: a man. not sexism, merely hypothetical grammatical correctness talk2hand The person reading this will not always be male, but as a sexist pig, you wouldn't think about that. talk2hand true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister! oh, don't worry, i won't target you
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:55 pm
MegaTherion777 kacisko MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister! oh, don't worry, i won't target you *back up against a wall* cool Fail safe.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:58 pm
My Hollow MegaTherion777 kacisko MegaTherion777 My Hollow MegaTherion777 true, but it is also a lot more convenient to say he instead of "he or she," and replacing the pronoun with the plural "they" is grammatically incorrect. so while i may be a sexist pig, at least i am a convenient sexist pig (and grammatically correct to boot) talk2hand The worst kind, you butt grabbing he-male. oh, i'm a butt-grabber too? Are you?!!? I will now watch you twice as carfefully when you're around me, mister! oh, don't worry, i won't target you *back up against a wall* cool Fail safe. you've obviously never played portal...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|