|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:35 am
It seems everyone dislikes those Frodo and Sam parts. I like the part with Shelob, but that was the only cool part.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:37 am
I LOVE Frodo and Sam parts! I like Sam, he's got an awesome role. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:46 am
To each their own I suppose. 3nodding
And spence, just running this by you: Should the people running the thread in the branching post be the one to make that post?
I mean, instead of you having my branch listed, would it be better if the person running it was there?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 9:52 am
That would be better yes, but I'm not so sure how well that'll work. With the branching thread being locked, I don't know if regular members can even edit posts. And since not all threads will work and some will I'm sure we'll be adding and deleting posts alot. So we have to have it locked if you were to want the hosts posting there branch so all the branches remain at the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:07 am
You can unlock it when someone wants to post their branch, then relock it. But I can understand how that could be difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:09 am
And at the same time, I don't think it would need to be locked. You could just write in the first post "Please do not post here" so that no one would. And if they did, you could just delete the post.
I think that's a little more practical because that makes it to where the owner of the thread can much more easily edit his thread information when necessary. But once again, if it's too much of a hassle, don't bother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:15 am
And has anyone here seen Dirty Rotten Scoundrels? I heart that movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:36 am
Blessed Blade And at the same time, I don't think it would need to be locked. You could just write in the first post "Please do not post here" so that no one would. And if they did, you could just delete the post. I think that's a little more practical because that makes it to where the owner of the thread can much more easily edit his thread information when necessary. But once again, if it's too much of a hassle, don't bother. .........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:41 am
I'm sorry I'm upsetting you... I'm really not trying to.... I'm not saying you're lazy or anything, just that it might be a pain in the rump to do....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:47 am
Blessed Blade I'm sorry I'm upsetting you... I'm really not trying to.... I'm not saying you're lazy or anything, just that it might be a pain in the rump to do.... you quit...I think I can handle this Blade....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:48 am
Alright then. *bows respectfully*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2005 12:42 pm
Neko Athena LOTR is very close to meh heart. But in other news.... Who saw Constantine? eh, eh, eh? It was uber entertaining. I heart Balthazar. And Constantine. Not the bug guy so much, though. Anyway, thoughts? I liked the way they did hell, it reminded me of Silent Hill. But then again anything that reminds me of Silent Hill is heart 'd. I loved Constantine, the guy was such a jerk x3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 11:14 am
I haven't watched a movie in awhile :U
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:56 am
I watched Robots a while ago. Good stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 12, 2005 4:58 pm
Fukyuu Kisaki I watched Robots a while ago. Good stuff. I wanna watch that! >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
