Welcome to Gaia! ::

Unashamed - A Christian Discussion Guild

Back to Guilds

 

Tags: Christian, Discussion, Religion, Theology, Philosophy 

Reply Thread Archive {Hot topics}
Sin before the Fall? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Lethkhar

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:18 pm


Fushigi na Butterfly
Lethkhar
Where do you think that close-mindedness is rooted? If there was no religion, they would still be friends.


Except that it's not the one with "religion" who's being closed-minded. It's his friend, who had no religion, that can't understand why someone who is following God would not want to watch a movie with gratuitous nudity or swearing or violence, would not want to hang out for a few hours in a bar with drunk people, etc. etc. My best friend is agnostic and terribly turned off from the Christian God, but she accepts my beliefs and opinions on things, and never pressures me to do things I feel go against them. She even encourages me to do things that would be beneficial to my faith. The closed-mindedness is not just something to pin on "religious fanatics." And I mean this in general, not just in the case of my dad and his friend. Even you are open-minded enough to understand that the one girl who was looking for a Christian best friend wanted a close friend who shared her beliefs. I definitely noted that you weren't all, "who cares if your best friend isn't a Christian??" and I thought it very admirable of you. For what it's worth, anyway ...

No, no, no...You're missing my point.

If religion didn't exist in the first place, your father's atheist friend wouldn't have a problem with your father and they would still be friends.

It doesn't matter who's being close-minded, what matters is why.

Quote:
Lethkhar
That still seems rather unfair to me. Why'd he have to sell everything he owned and we don't?


If a person feels that selling all of their possessions would help them get closer to God then so be it. It's not a requirement of us unless it's a requirement of us (if you get what I'm trying to say here). God required it of the man because it was the last thing holding him back from following after Jesus. Personally, I don't find materialism to be a problem or something that hinders my faith. If it was, then I would definitely consider selling off all my possessions and moving to live in a hut. Or something.

So why were his possessions holding him back and ours don't?

That still seems awfully unfair to me.

Quote:
Lethkhar
How morbid. xp

Seriously, that's utterly grotesque. Can't you see what you're typing? This is your God that's doing this to people! Not just people who deny His existence, either. Anyone who chose the "wrong path" gets incinerated. I can't believe you can actually consider it moral.


It's a law of nature (created by God) and incentive to follow Him. It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His. He created it that way so that people would consider what it might be like without Him. It shouldn't be the first thing people oconsider, but if it helps to sway your decision then so much the better. I know it wasn't the first thing that crossed my mind when I decided to be a Christian. It crosses my mind every now and again, and I think to myself, "I'm so glad I'm not going there" but ... yeah ... I think that's all I was gonna say on that. confused

Wow...Could you just reread what you wrote there?

"It's a law of nature (created by God) and incentive to follow Him. It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

Now, just look at that quote. You wrote that. Now, I want you to slowly slip from your mind any sense of religious prejudice. Forget whatever argumentative nature you have, forget your loyalty to God for just a second, just forget it.

Now, read that quote and answer this simple question: Does burning people for eternity for a simple mistake, probably unintentional, seem moral to you?

Now, I know what you're thinking. Your religious mind is kicking in again and giving me the response you just gave me,"It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

I want you to look at this situation clearly, from an objective perspective, and tell me honestly whether this seems moral or not. Do not assume that because it comes from a higher power that it must be automatically moral, even if we don't understand how. Just think about your personal beliefs and values, and give me a straight answer. Does God (From your mere mortal perspective) seem moral?

If your answer is still "yes", then you as a Christian are a hypocrite. You shouldn't hate your enemies.

Hell is a scare tactic. A truly benevolent God would never do that.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 9:24 pm


Lethkhar
Hell is a scare tactic. A truly benevolent God would never do that.

Hell is a punishment, not a scare tactic.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:57 am


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar
Hell is a scare tactic. A truly benevolent God would never do that.

Hell is a punishment, not a scare tactic.

No. A punishment from a benevolent source would imply that it eventually ended, and that you learned something from it. Something like a time out.

Hell is not a punishment from a benevolent source. It's eternal, and doesn't offer a second chance to correct your little mistake.

It's an obvious scare tactic made up by humans, not God. It's an idea that was pretty much copied from the Greeks. (Almost word for word)
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:17 pm


Lethkhar

No. A punishment from a benevolent source would imply that it eventually ended, and that you learned something from it. Something like a time out.

ORLY?

says who? Because it's certainly not the dictionary.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:27 pm


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar

No. A punishment from a benevolent source would imply that it eventually ended, and that you learned something from it. Something like a time out.

ORLY?

says who? Because it's certainly not the dictionary.

See that "from a benevolent source" there? Yeah, might want to read the whole post before you get all defensive.
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:58 pm


Lethkhar

See that "from a benevolent source" there? Yeah, might want to read the whole post before you get all defensive.

Burden's on you to prove that 'benevolence' inherently entails not punishing someone for an offense committed.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 12:52 am


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar

See that "from a benevolent source" there? Yeah, might want to read the whole post before you get all defensive.

Burden's on you to prove that 'benevolence' inherently entails not punishing someone for an offense committed.

Well, as the definition implies benevolence would mean that you have a disposition towards doing good. Now, punishing one who has unintentionally committed a crime could be considered justice and, in turn, good, as long as the criminal learned from their mistake and was given the chance to redeem themself. This is where the line between discipline and abuse is drawn. Discipline can inflict temporary, non-scarring pain to help the one being penalized understand that what they did was wrong. You can discipline someone and still be benevolent. However, inflicting permanent and constant pain for one simple error is abuse, and is in no way benevolent. I'm sure you can agree with that.

If not, I fear for your children. (If you have any or if you are going to have any, that is)
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 7:00 pm


Lethkhar
No, no, no...You're missing my point.

If religion didn't exist in the first place, your father's atheist friend wouldn't have a problem with your father and they would still be friends.

It doesn't matter who's being close-minded, what matters is why.


Actually, both matter. The argument can go the other way as well; if his friend wasn't an atheist there wouldn't be aproblem, but just as we can't force everyone to have no religion, we can't force everyone to have the same religion.

Lethkhar
So why were his possessions holding him back and ours don't?

That still seems awfully unfair to me.


I don't know why he had to. The Bible doesn't go into detail on his personality, but that's what it comes down to. Like I said before, if your possessions are hindering, get rid of them. If your relationships are hindering you, get rid of them, if your attitude is hindering you, get rid of it, if your lifestyle is hindering you, get rid of it. It's a story that reiterates other passages of serving two masters, which you can't do, because you'll end up loving one and hating the other, or loving one more than the other. In this case, the man had two masters: his possessions, and Jesus. One of them had to go, and the man was obviously seeking Jesus, so Jesus told him which had to go.

Lethkhar
Wow...Could you just reread what you wrote there?

"It's a law of nature (created by God) and incentive to follow Him. It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

Now, just look at that quote. You wrote that. Now, I want you to slowly slip from your mind any sense of religious prejudice. Forget whatever argumentative nature you have, forget your loyalty to God for just a second, just forget it.

Now, read that quote and answer this simple question: Does burning people for eternity for a simple mistake, probably unintentional, seem moral to you?

Now, I know what you're thinking. Your religious mind is kicking in again and giving me the response you just gave me,"It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

I want you to look at this situation clearly, from an objective perspective, and tell me honestly whether this seems moral or not. Do not assume that because it comes from a higher power that it must be automatically moral, even if we don't understand how. Just think about your personal beliefs and values, and give me a straight answer. Does God (From your mere mortal perspective) seem moral?

If your answer is still "yes", then you as a Christian are a hypocrite. You shouldn't hate your enemies.

Hell is a scare tactic. A truly benevolent God would never do that.


No, eternal punishment for one unintentional mistake is not moral. However, we can't really base anything my sense of morality, because like I said before, I'm not God. Morality has to come from somewhere. Your morality is different from mine and mine is different from the next person's and so on. We can't all be right. Morality has to come from somewhere. Is it right or wrong to have an affair outside of marriage? Person A says yes and Person B says no, but who's right? Only way to know is if there is some concrete rule set by someone or something above them. Just like kids when they have an argument. Who do they go to (or who should they go to) to settle it? The adults who set the rules in the first place.

Not only that, but those who are condemned to Hell aren't done so for one unintentional mistake, they are condemned for a lifetime of sin and denial of the Holy Spirit, whether or not they were "good people."

Fushigi na Butterfly

High-functioning Businesswoman

7,000 Points
  • Swap Meet 100
  • Millionaire 200
  • Tycoon 200

Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 9:00 pm


Fushigi na Butterfly
Lethkhar
No, no, no...You're missing my point.

If religion didn't exist in the first place, your father's atheist friend wouldn't have a problem with your father and they would still be friends.

It doesn't matter who's being close-minded, what matters is why.


Actually, both matter. The argument can go the other way as well; if his friend wasn't an atheist there wouldn't be aproblem, but just as we can't force everyone to have no religion, we can't force everyone to have the same religion.

You're right, you could reverse it so everyone has the same religion.

But issue is still that of religion.

Quote:
Lethkhar
So why were his possessions holding him back and ours don't?

That still seems awfully unfair to me.


I don't know why he had to. The Bible doesn't go into detail on his personality, but that's what it comes down to. Like I said before, if your possessions are hindering, get rid of them. If your relationships are hindering you, get rid of them, if your attitude is hindering you, get rid of it, if your lifestyle is hindering you, get rid of it. It's a story that reiterates other passages of serving two masters, which you can't do, because you'll end up loving one and hating the other, or loving one more than the other. In this case, the man had two masters: his possessions, and Jesus. One of them had to go, and the man was obviously seeking Jesus, so Jesus told him which had to go.

How do you know what's hindeirng you and what isn't?

That guy needed Jesus to tell him what was hindering him. Otherwise, he had followed every single commandment. He said so himself. Jesus imposed an extra commandment on that guy specifically?

Quote:
Lethkhar
Wow...Could you just reread what you wrote there?

"It's a law of nature (created by God) and incentive to follow Him. It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

Now, just look at that quote. You wrote that. Now, I want you to slowly slip from your mind any sense of religious prejudice. Forget whatever argumentative nature you have, forget your loyalty to God for just a second, just forget it.

Now, read that quote and answer this simple question: Does burning people for eternity for a simple mistake, probably unintentional, seem moral to you?

Now, I know what you're thinking. Your religious mind is kicking in again and giving me the response you just gave me,"It might not seem right, but we aren't God, and we can't compare our sense of justice and morality to His."

I want you to look at this situation clearly, from an objective perspective, and tell me honestly whether this seems moral or not. Do not assume that because it comes from a higher power that it must be automatically moral, even if we don't understand how. Just think about your personal beliefs and values, and give me a straight answer. Does God (From your mere mortal perspective) seem moral?

If your answer is still "yes", then you as a Christian are a hypocrite. You shouldn't hate your enemies.

Hell is a scare tactic. A truly benevolent God would never do that.


No, eternal punishment for one unintentional mistake is not moral. However, we can't really base anything my sense of morality, because like I said before, I'm not God. Morality has to come from somewhere. Your morality is different from mine and mine is different from the next person's and so on. We can't all be right. Morality has to come from somewhere. Is it right or wrong to have an affair outside of marriage? Person A says yes and Person B says no, but who's right? Only way to know is if there is some concrete rule set by someone or something above them. Just like kids when they have an argument. Who do they go to (or who should they go to) to settle it? The adults who set the rules in the first place.

Not only that, but those who are condemned to Hell aren't done so for one unintentional mistake, they are condemned for a lifetime of sin and denial of the Holy Spirit, whether or not they were "good people."

I have come to the conclusion that you are beyond help.

You yourself have admitted that your beliefs are illogical and immoral, yet you still believe them.

Your beliefs should be based on your own personal conclusions. It should be based on what you believe. If you believe it is immoral, then you should trust yourself that it is immoral. Other people may disagree with you, but they're your beliefs and it's up to you to determine them.

I know you won't listen to me. I know that no matter what I say, your religious mind will kick in and defy reason and your own sense of morality. You've been enslaved by it. Your mind is probably too fragile at this point to survive without it.

Even if I somehow do plant some sort of seed in your mind, you'll go and pray for guidance or something and end up "persevering" and completely ignoring whatever it is I have to say.

It's a shame. You seem like an intelligent person. I'm just trying to liberate you. It feels so good...

Well, have fun worshipping and kissing your admittedly evil deity's a** to keep from burning. That's not the life for me, or any free-thinking human for that matter.
PostPosted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 9:20 pm


Lethkhar
Well, as the definition implies benevolence would mean that you have a disposition towards doing good. Now, punishing one who has unintentionally committed a crime could be considered justice and, in turn, good, as long as the criminal learned from their mistake and was given the chance to redeem themself.

Prove it.

Quote:
This is where the line between discipline and abuse is drawn. Discipline can inflict temporary, non-scarring pain to help the one being penalized understand that what they did was wrong. You can discipline someone and still be benevolent. However, inflicting permanent and constant pain for one simple error is abuse, and is in no way benevolent. I'm sure you can agree with that.

Well, G-d doesn't punish someone who unknowingly commits a crime. You either know it (and are then liable before the law) or do not (and, according to Romans 7:8, 'sin is dead'). What happens to those apart from the Law is talked about in Romans 2:12, however, I have a sneaking suspicion that the Greek word used for 'perish' may have another, deeper meaning.

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:01 am


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar
Well, as the definition implies benevolence would mean that you have a disposition towards doing good. Now, punishing one who has unintentionally committed a crime could be considered justice and, in turn, good, as long as the criminal learned from their mistake and was given the chance to redeem themself.

Prove it.

It's implied by His benevolence.

Quote:
Quote:
This is where the line between discipline and abuse is drawn. Discipline can inflict temporary, non-scarring pain to help the one being penalized understand that what they did was wrong. You can discipline someone and still be benevolent. However, inflicting permanent and constant pain for one simple error is abuse, and is in no way benevolent. I'm sure you can agree with that.

Well, G-d doesn't punish someone who unknowingly commits a crime. You either know it (and are then liable before the law) or do not (and, according to Romans 7:8, 'sin is dead'). What happens to those apart from the Law is talked about in Romans 2:12, however, I have a sneaking suspicion that the Greek word used for 'perish' may have another, deeper meaning.

So being an atheist, I'm not burning?
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:20 pm


Lethkhar
I have come to the conclusion that you are beyond help.

You yourself have admitted that your beliefs are illogical and immoral, yet you still believe them.

Your beliefs should be based on your own personal conclusions. It should be based on what you believe. If you believe it is immoral, then you should trust yourself that it is immoral. Other people may disagree with you, but they're your beliefs and it's up to you to determine them.


So it's perfectly moral for me to kill a person if I believe it's the right thing to do? Huh ... So laws were made to be broken. Go, anarchy.

Lethkhar
I know you won't listen to me. I know that no matter what I say, your religious mind will kick in and defy reason and your own sense of morality. You've been enslaved by it. Your mind is probably too fragile at this point to survive without it.


Meh. Maybe so. I'm not complaining.

Lethkhar
It's a shame. You seem like an intelligent person. I'm just trying to liberate you. It feels so good...


First you tell me I should do what feels right and then you turn around and try to make me do the opposite? Now who's not making any sense? confused

Lethkhar
Well, have fun worshipping and kissing your admittedly evil deity's a** to keep from burning. That's not the life for me, or any free-thinking human for that matter.


Too bad He's not actually evil, but thanks, I will. 3nodding

Fushigi na Butterfly

High-functioning Businesswoman

7,000 Points
  • Swap Meet 100
  • Millionaire 200
  • Tycoon 200

Lethkhar

PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 8:39 pm


Fushigi na Butterfly
Lethkhar
I have come to the conclusion that you are beyond help.

You yourself have admitted that your beliefs are illogical and immoral, yet you still believe them.

Your beliefs should be based on your own personal conclusions. It should be based on what you believe. If you believe it is immoral, then you should trust yourself that it is immoral. Other people may disagree with you, but they're your beliefs and it's up to you to determine them.


So it's perfectly moral for me to kill a person if I believe it's the right thing to do? Huh ... So laws were made to be broken. Go, anarchy.

That depends; Are you an objectivist?

You don't think killing is moral, so it's beside the point.

Quote:
Lethkhar
I know you won't listen to me. I know that no matter what I say, your religious mind will kick in and defy reason and your own sense of morality. You've been enslaved by it. Your mind is probably too fragile at this point to survive without it.


Meh. Maybe so. I'm not complaining.

I know you're not. That's my point. Talking to you about religion is like talking to a brainwashed zombie, which is basically what I'm doing.

Quote:
Lethkhar
It's a shame. You seem like an intelligent person. I'm just trying to liberate you. It feels so good...


First you tell me I should do what feels right and then you turn around and try to make me do the opposite? Now who's not making any sense? confused

No. Your beliefs (currently) are based on a single book. They are not your own beliefs. Even you think your own beliefs are immoral. You should leave it.

And trust me, atheism feels at least ten times better.

Quote:
Lethkhar
Well, have fun worshipping and kissing your admittedly evil deity's a** to keep from burning. That's not the life for me, or any free-thinking human for that matter.


Too bad He's not actually evil, but thanks, I will. 3nodding

You've said yourself that His actions are immoral. He is quite evil.
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:06 pm


Lethkhar

It's implied by His benevolence.

No, I mean that you have made the claim that benevolence must entail eventual forgiveness and non-eternal punishment. Now prove that statement.

Quote:

So being an atheist, I'm not burning?

Not believing and not knowing are two different things. Though, even if you didn't know, you might still be burning (as, again, I'm not sure if there's a connotation of some sort in koine for that passage)

ioioouiouiouio


Lethkhar

PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:00 pm


Cometh The Inquisitor
Lethkhar

It's implied by His benevolence.

No, I mean that you have made the claim that benevolence must entail eventual forgiveness and non-eternal punishment. Now prove that statement.

Logic. If you have good intentions for something, you don't burn it for eternity. rolleyes

Quote:
Quote:

So being an atheist, I'm not burning?

Not believing and not knowing are two different things. Though, even if you didn't know, you might still be burning (as, again, I'm not sure if there's a connotation of some sort in koine for that passage)

Well, in all honesty I don't know if He exists...
Reply
Thread Archive {Hot topics}

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum