|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:00 pm
I like how Pantheon's name was Dumbledore and in your story he died.
YER A WIZARD, HARRY
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 6:42 pm
Cabron LaSwan I like how Pantheon's name was Dumbledore and in your story he died.
YER A MUMMY, HARRY fix'd ????
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problematic briefcase Crew
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:58 pm
amumu's new skin's laugh is global.
everyone can hear it anywhere
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:40 am
I was playin' with Kuzo and I demolished a Leblanc in lane as an Ahri. She rushed a Tear of the Goddess. I told her she needs to build damage first to have the insane AP mid-destroying burst that you pick Leblanc for, and that Archangel's at all is not a good idea on her.
She responds with "Well, I didn't have a chance against Ahri anyway; you're OP."
Leblanc. Is claiming she has no chance. Against an Ahri.
neutral
I try to explain that well-used jump skills demolish skillshot champions (and that she needs to stop farming with it), and that a silence and high burst destroys ANY mage, but atmog's Fizz ("it's totally pro, what you've never seen it? I only got destroyed in lane by a Tryndamere because he's OP too." [lol]) chimes in with "No, Ahri IS op. GG, GJ playing no-skill broken champs."
I don't understand this defeatist mentality; it doesn't even make sense to me. If x champ is truly OP, why aren't you playing them if you know the champ you picked is inferior? If you know x champ is going to be a problem, why don't you build to counter it? If you're getting destroyed by someone you are intended to counter, don't you think you'd benefit to take notes?
I just want people to respect that I know what I'm talking about
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:08 am
I have the best games late at night with Kuzo.
btw i feed in bots
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:51 pm
>play Singed in normal with Sarah, LPS, Kuzo, and one of their friends
>LPS and I are low health, and suddenly Skarner coming towards us
>I fling him to LPS
>"WHY DID YOU DO --" LPS kills Skarner
>"That's why!"
>We retreat to top turret brush
>Akali shows up
>Fling her to LPS AGAIN
>she doesn't say anything about it and just kills Akali
lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:38 am
I call this one the Thank You Blitzcrank.
I just now noticed that Kuzo was on his way to building the Viking Ship.
I'm so proud of you. crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:32 pm
Bulbadoof I call this one the Thank You Blitzcrank.
I just now noticed that Kuzo was on his way to building the Viking Ship.
I'm so proud of you. crying
More-so for the build or for the massive feeding you fest? razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:21 pm
Kuzodav Bulbadoof I call this one the Thank You Blitzcrank.
[hi im blitzcrank]http://i.imgur.com/hoAru.jpg[/spaghetti and meatballs]
I just now noticed that Kuzo was on his way to building the Viking Ship.
I'm so proud of you. crying
More-so for the build or for the massive feeding you fest? razz THE VIKING SHIP
nobutsrsly both. Of all the leaguefags I think you and I have the best coordination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:25 am
PROPOSITION TIME
ARAM -- Draft Mode!
We all have that one champion we just cannot grasp. For example, I cannot Tryndamere. At all. I don't understand his kit beyond his "lol i don't die for like 3 seconds" ult. I'm bad with him, and I just get frustrated playing him. My team gets frustrated with me playing him.
So what I propose is a draft mode with a twist. As we mainly play 3v3s anyway ("Oh boy there's six of us. You know what that means!"), we do a draft mode in which everyone speaks up about the champion they're bad with, and that champion gets banned. Eve, Zil, etc would be exempt as we skip them if we get them anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:54 pm
See Volty if that is applied to me that pretty much gets rid of every single champion.
But I would be all for like a "reroll if you ******** hate this champion" rule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:40 pm
Decavolty PROPOSITION TIME ARAM -- Draft Mode! We all have that one champion we just cannot grasp. For example, I cannot Tryndamere. At all. I don't understand his kit beyond his "lol i don't die for like 3 seconds" ult. I'm bad with him, and I just get frustrated playing him. My team gets frustrated with me playing him. So what I propose is a draft mode with a twist. As we mainly play 3v3s anyway ("Oh boy there's six of us. You know what that means!"), we do a draft mode in which everyone speaks up about the champion they're bad with, and that champion gets banned. Eve, Zil, etc would be exempt as we skip them if we get them anyway. someone: "I'm bad with Nidalee"
LPS: "******** you."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:01 am
Bulbadoof Decavolty PROPOSITION TIME ARAM -- Draft Mode! We all have that one champion we just cannot grasp. For example, I cannot Tryndamere. At all. I don't understand his kit beyond his "lol i don't die for like 3 seconds" ult. I'm bad with him, and I just get frustrated playing him. My team gets frustrated with me playing him. So what I propose is a draft mode with a twist. As we mainly play 3v3s anyway ("Oh boy there's six of us. You know what that means!"), we do a draft mode in which everyone speaks up about the champion they're bad with, and that champion gets banned. Eve, Zil, etc would be exempt as we skip them if we get them anyway. someone: "I'm bad with Nidalee"
LPS: "******** you." ...you can't be bad with Nidalee in ARAM. You have literally everything you need to survive an ARAM. Before anyone makes the Tryndamere argument, Nid also has range, and a skill based on how far away she is!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
