|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 10:53 am
Hey, I just dont like it. I prefer blasters.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:11 am
Not as useful against lightsabers sadly. But everything has its weakness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:51 am
Actually, i could see a rather unique light-hammer for skuld.
A wide-beam saber that's no longer than a shoto, if not less, but about five times as thick, attached perpendicular to a shaft. On the other end, the same thing and pointed the oppostie way. Both have small repulsors to help speed the spinning of the staff.
If you weren't so worried about speed, replace the microthrusters with a pair of shotos, so that it becomes a sort of dual pickaxe.
Unwieldy, but fun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:53 am
You cant hammer with a Lightsaber.
What you described is a light pick axe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:02 pm
Hear me out. don't forget we're building a light-hammer.
Its essentially a polarized field which encapsulates the superheated plasma, no? Well, a lightsaber blade is long and thin, which means that the tip of the lightsaber is extremely far from any projector.
If one makes the tip of the lightsaber very close to the projector, the said field which encapsulates the plasma can be logorythmically bolstered, making a more of a smash. Instead of a long projection field, you get a very short and powerful one, which can be widened now to something about 9 inches across. Instead of a three inch beam that goes out 3 feet, you get a 9 inch beam which goes out 1 foot. A very fat beam, nonetheless, but somethign which would be very painful to be hit with.
Unlike the saber, which would cut through everything it touches easily, the magnetic pulses would allow for a more forceful hit, with less actual cauterizing damage, because the shielding is stronger. so, if it connects with armor, it won't go straight through, but it will melt and singe to no end due to the pure concentration of the blade's size. If it touches flesh, it doesn't burn clean either, instead leaving a rather nasty hunk of flesh which slowly melts away...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:04 pm
She wants a hammer so she can bludgeon people.
Not put big melty holes in 'em.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:05 pm
so I added some nice quirks to it. Excuse me for being an angry scientist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:11 pm
I dont think I will.
It was a poorly thought out idea that totally ignored Skuld's instinctual feminine desire to smash things with blunt instruments.
It was about as lame as that sheep powered raygun of yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:18 pm
I invented a sheep powered ray gun? But I'm part of the goblin engineer corps, not the gnomish convention...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:21 pm
Wait...if you didnt make that Sheep powered Raygun in Storage deck C....then who did?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:57 pm
ninja
How about just mimic the Halo design? Get a large war hammer, strap small replusors onto the back of the head, with a button on the shaft, when swung, activate them, you just need to be strong enough to keep hold of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 1:58 pm
The Halo design doesnt look as cool as the power hammer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:05 pm
The power hammer is nifty, but this lightsaber-hammer thing is just ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
