Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Pro-life Guild
Dead Baby Found In Abortion Clinic Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

People Counter
  + 1
View Results

McPhee
Crew

Friendly Elocutionist

8,150 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Flatterer 200
  • Popular Thread 100
PostPosted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:53 pm


Beware the Jabberwock
Mcphee
Faeyas
lymelady
She didn't abort. She had a baby and dumped it in the trash.

But she's still being labeled as Pro-choice. It's...a little too nasty for my tastes.


This may just be me, but I doubt any Pro-choicer would agree with killing the child after it was born.


Except those ones who think that no human being really ever deserves their life, because humans are worthless creatures.

And yes, that's an almost exact quote.


Quote:
Pro-Choice isn't "Pro Abort" or even "Anti having a baby" or "Anti motherhood" I would ask you to kindly stop confusing the term. Pro Choice means we simply support women having the OPTION to abort available to them should they need/want to. If they abort, *shrug* fine by us, if they keep it? Still fine by us.


The problem with that is that you think that it's okay for a woman to kill her child, as long as it's young enough so that you don't have to feel bad about it, and that doesn't seem fair to me to take advantage of a young human being like that, simply because you don't believe it should be classified as one.

And I wouldn't be one to talk about using certain terms. I've explained SEVERAL times why pro-life doesn't mean anti-woman, and I'm still called anti-woman. And anti-choice, for that matter.

I don't think pro-choice means "Babies suck!", but I DO think that pro-choice dehumanizes a human being, because you're saying "Sure, kill it if you want to, and if you don't want to, that's cool too."

A decision like that seems too casual, considering in one of those decisions, a human dies.


Quote:
In this case the woman did choose to abort, obviously didn't (which was more than likely out of her hands), and thus we have a dead baby.

Imagine if the doctor lied to her, saying she had aborted, but really the doctor didn't do the operation. I see that as a potentially great crime there.


Oh, crap, you're SO right. Then a woman would have had to have had a child, and someone would be alive, rather than dead.

That is QUITE an atroscity, indeed.

Adrian, you're starting to sound so much like me, it's scary. XD

I learned from the best, honey. heart
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:56 am


i'm probably 3 pages late for this one, but isn't "dead baby found in abortion clinic" sort of an understatement?

divineseraph


lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:57 am


divineseraph
i'm probably 3 pages late for this one, but isn't "dead baby found in abortion clinic" sort of an understatement?
xd Yeah... when they said, "the gruesome discovery of a dead baby’s body inside of an abortion clinic" I was like, Well what'd they think they'd find in an abortion clinic? Puppies?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:07 am


The autopsy was done last saterday. Any one know if they released the results yet?

Tiger of the Fire


lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:13 am


I was looking for them, but couldn't find them.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:56 am


there's a shock. I bet this got swept under the rug real quick.

andyz cool


lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:00 pm


Well, autopsy reports aren't always released quickly. The one for that woman who stuffed her baby in a trashcan came out a few weeks after it was done, I think.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:39 pm


Sorry about the length, I was trying to respond in a single post instead of multiple.

Mcphee
Quote:
Not the womans fault people, clinic, evil clinic. Now if Clinics wern't so protested about they could be better monitored and things like this might become figments of the past.

Oh, I see. So you're trying to turn this whole thing around and make the death of a child the fault of the pro-lifers?

You seem to be saying "If you guys didn't protest so much, the clinics would be better!" when in fact we protest because the clinics are doing an awful thing by being in existence in the first place.

Anyone who chooses to have an abortion should know there are JUST as many risks as in pregnancy.


*Shakes head* nonono!!! I must have said that wrong. I was pointing out that Clinics could use more regulations, and while the fight is towards getting rid of them, often this (regulation) is forgotten.

I also agree, that women deserve to know all risks involved in having an abortion, it is the right and it is illegal for the doctor to not inform them.

MiNdCaNdY
she was still wrong to get an abortion that late in her pregnancy, so really that argument about it being the doctor's fault dosen't matter at all.


This is true; she was far too late to have the abortion if she had it while the child was 2-3 pounds. My argument was more of a “what if”, she had the abortion earlier, and later she gave birth prematurely to an infant of 2-3 pounds?

Mcphee
Faeyas
lymelady
She didn't abort. She had a baby and dumped it in the trash.

But she's still being labeled as Pro-choice. It's...a little too nasty for my tastes.


This may just be me, but I doubt any Pro-choicer would agree with killing the child after it was born.


Except those ones who think that no human being really ever deserves their life, because humans are worthless creatures.

And yes, that's an almost exact quote.


Quote:
Pro-Choice isn't "Pro Abort" or even "Anti having a baby" or "Anti motherhood" I would ask you to kindly stop confusing the term. Pro Choice means we simply support women having the OPTION to abort available to them should they need/want to. If they abort, *shrug* fine by us, if they keep it? Still fine by us.


The problem with that is that you think that it's okay for a woman to kill her child, as long as it's young enough so that you don't have to feel bad about it, and that doesn't seem fair to me to take advantage of a young human being like that, simply because you don't believe it should be classified as one.

And I wouldn't be one to talk about using certain terms. I've explained SEVERAL times why pro-life doesn't mean anti-woman, and I'm still called anti-woman. And anti-choice, for that matter.

I don't think pro-choice means "Babies suck!", but I DO think that pro-choice dehumanizes a human being, because you're saying "Sure, kill it if you want to, and if you don't want to, that's cool too."

A decision like that seems too casual, considering in one of those decisions, a human dies.


Quote:
In this case the woman did choose to abort, obviously didn't (which was more than likely out of her hands), and thus we have a dead baby.

Imagine if the doctor lied to her, saying she had aborted, but really the doctor didn't do the operation. I see that as a potentially great crime there.


Oh, crap, you're SO right. Then a woman would have had to have had a child, and someone would be alive, rather than dead.

That is QUITE an atroscity, indeed.


From top to bottom!

1) as the following post reads:

kp606
Quote:
This may just be me, but I doubt any Pro-choicer would agree with killing the child after it was born.

It is just you. I know choicers who have little respect for infants. If abortion went out the window they'd support infantacide. I have heard the words, I have seen the sentence.


I am apparently the only one, or one of the few, unheard who doesn’t agree with killing the child once born. And with the response above, I further agree with 22 weeks is too late and abortion shouldn’t be allowed. Anything after 5 months is really too late.

I hold this to the others who have informed me that there are choicers who believe in the death of a child once born.

2) I try not to use the terms “Anti woman” “Anti choice” for I consider them just as rude as me being called “Anti life”. Forgive me if I have ever referred to ANYONE as a negative stance like this. I consider myself part “Pro life” because I agree that you all have the right to keep your children. I agree with the choice. I may not agree with the effects all the time but I believe everyone deserves the right of choice. I understand this might seem too casual for most of you, but choice is a huge thing, choice is part of freedom. I’m not trying to dehumanize anything; I’m just sticking up for the right of choice. Furthermore, I am here to LEARN I appreciate it when anyone you explain the consequences of choosing abortion, for I believe women and MEN should be informed of the choices in full, even if reality isn’t pleasant.

3) You misunderstand me. I was referring to the fact that if ANY doctor lies knowingly to a patient, be it male or female, about the condition of their body, or what they (the doctor) have done to their body; it is considered a medical crime. This is once again part of my “What if” argument.

Pyrotechnic Oracle
Quote:
This may just be me, but I doubt any Pro-choicer would agree with killing the child after it was born.
Wrong. Lyme can tell you a feel stories about this one.

Quote:
Pro-Choice isn't "Pro Abort" or even "Anti having a baby" or "Anti motherhood" I would ask you to kindly stop confusing the term. Pro Choice means we simply support women having the OPTION to abort available to them should they need/want to. If they abort, *shrug* fine by us, if they keep it? Still fine by us.
Do you support the legalisation of abortion? Then you are pro-abortion.

Quote:
In this case the woman did choose to abort, obviously didn't (which was more than likely out of her hands), and thus we have a dead baby.
And it obviously seems like you don't care. If the child is, for any reason, born alive it is required by law that the cinic notify the nearest medical authorities.

Quote:
Imagine if the doctor lied to her, saying she had aborted, but really the doctor didn't do the operation. I see that as a potentially great crime there.


Hey, guess what. The child may have been born alivea dnthen smothered with a bio-bag. It already is a potential great crime.

But yes, her giving birth to a live human being who can hopefully gorw up loved by his mother, or loved by people who want him, or at the very least gorw up and experince life and make his own choices would be a terrible crime!


Top to bottom again:

1] I support having the option available. There are instances where I would like to see women being able to have an abortion without it ruining their lives and having them sent to jail. One of which is close to my heart: In the instance of Rape, and likely hood of death of the mother, and potentially the infant, whether it is in birth, or the child and the mother attempting to reject each other, causing harm to both the mother can child until the mother has a miscarriage or dies. (This happens with a certain rare blood type and is by no means a laughing matter, I understand that there are other options, riskier options, but if the mother in this instance wants an abortion or its becoming clear that her life is in danger, she should be able to legally abort. ) Also in the instances where the child couldn’t be properly supported from birth on (The mother couldn’t even afford to go to a hospital to bare, which believe it or not can happen, if there are no hospitals available who are willing to do the operation then consider the bill)

2] Agreed. Although she did choose to abort it clearly didn’t happen, that was all I was saying.

3] See my above not on medical crime.

Pyrotechnic Oracle
Faeyas
lymelady
...except for the ones whose mothers decide after birth, I don't want to be a mother! And then go on to beat those children.


I thought pro-life meant the woman couldn't decide until after birth? I agree beating is bad.

[Edit: the above is asking for clarity of the statement made.]


Nope. Pro-life means that we belive that a human is a perosn through all stages of human life and shoudl be protected in the womb, a woman should be held responcible for the life of the child if she willingly consented to sex and that obtions for abortion shoudl not be made legally available to her, and that society shoudl change and adjust to give a little more help to woman who are pregnant as oppsed to tellign them they're gogin to fail at life if they don't kill. We are in no way against her decisions to obtain an abortion by other methods.


Thanks for the clarity, I appreciate it and I’m glad to hear this view.

Pyrotechnic Oracle
Faeyas

*points to the above post that considers the weight and time*

Not the womans fault people, clinic, evil clinic. Now if Clinics wern't so protested about they could be better monitored and things like this might become figments of the past.


Its being asessed, and its a possability. One I'm not willign to rule out and nore are they. Thats why they are assessing it.

Yes, lets make things the pro-lifers fault. As its the only thing most choicers know how to do these days. Lets make it the fault of the lifers instead of concidering it could be your own stances fault.

We want to make all legally sanctiona abortions a thing of the past.


Once again, I had no intention in that statement to attack anyone; I appreciate your views and by no means wish to limit them. I believe in choice. Your choice is to be Pro life; I respect this and support you thus.

Just remember that my option of choice means I must also support the choice of abortion too, even if I might not agree with some uses I still respect and support the right of choice.

I.Am
Faeyas
lymelady
...except for the ones whose mothers decide after birth, I don't want to be a mother! And then go on to beat those children.


I thought pro-life meant the woman couldn't decide until after birth? I agree beating is bad.

[Edit: the above is asking for clarity of the statement made.]
I believe she's commenting on how Pro-Choice devalues motherhood and children, stating that, if you don't want to be a mother, even if you are pregnant, you don't have to. So, if they decide a few years after birth that they didn't want to be mothers after all... *shrug*

Because, "I should have aborted you!" isn't really something that Pro-Lifers can say.


Thank you for clarifying, and I appreciate that you recognized that this is what I was requesting. I do not support mothers who after the birth of their child that they abandon said child. This is wrong. I believe that if this was their long term goal they should have destroyed the few cells while they were cells, before they started to form that of a child.

The following is not an attack but merely an observation I have made.

The mother who I have had to personally deal with who have abandoned their children once born, did so because they felt that they would be scorned if they received the abortion. The act of having the child the whole 9 months, messed with their brains, and their sanity, and they resorted to leaving the child in say a shoe box in the closet. The child was born, they then had the choice.

This is an act caused by peer pressure and I by no means fully blame the pro life community.

lymelady


I haven't confirmed yet, but I've seen people mention that the Florida Abortion Council successfully blocked it when the state tried to regulate abortion clinics, back in the 1980's. Does anyone know anything about that?


No I don’t, I think it’s wrong though, any medical area should be regulated by the surgeon general and the health department.

Faeyas

6,700 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Invisibility 100
  • Popular Thread 100

Tiger of the Fire

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:57 pm


the only instence where we woudl every actualy step down (I don't think any one here would personly support an abortion for any reason, steppeing down though and remaining quite is diffrent) is in cases where the victum of rape has become pregnant and is severly traumatised and no amount of counceling seems to help, or incases where the mothers life in threatened by the pregnancy.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:32 pm


divineseraph
i'm probably 3 pages late for this one, but isn't "dead baby found in abortion clinic" sort of an understatement?


Yeah, my reaction was like, this is news? It's like "DEAD COW FOUND IN SLAUGHTERHOUSE" or "LIQUOR STORE FOUND TO ENGAGE IN SALE OF ALCOHOL!" or "EXCLUSIVE! BENEDICT XVI REVEALS RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION IN SHOCKING REVELATION!"

Why no, my sarcasm knows no bounds. biggrin

La Veuve Zin

Rainbow Smoker

5,650 Points
  • Mega Tipsy 100
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Ultimate Player 200

lymelady
Vice Captain

PostPosted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:35 pm


La Veuve Zin
divineseraph
i'm probably 3 pages late for this one, but isn't "dead baby found in abortion clinic" sort of an understatement?


Yeah, my reaction was like, this is news? It's like "DEAD COW FOUND IN SLAUGHTERHOUSE" or "LIQUOR STORE FOUND TO ENGAGE IN SALE OF ALCOHOL!" or "EXCLUSIVE! BENEDICT XVI REVEALS RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION IN SHOCKING REVELATION!"

Why no, my sarcasm knows no bounds. biggrin
The pope's affiliated with a religion? surprised
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:58 am


"I agree however that at all times, she still had the right to request the abortion, whether she was informed of the risks or not. "
I wasn't too happy about this quote though... Information is exactly what every person needs. How can you make the choice that you really want if you have no idea what might come out of your choices?

Theallpowerfull


Faeyas

6,700 Points
  • Elocutionist 200
  • Invisibility 100
  • Popular Thread 100
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:10 pm


Theallpowerfull
"I agree however that at all times, she still had the right to request the abortion, whether she was informed of the risks or not. "
I wasn't too happy about this quote though... Information is exactly what every person needs. How can you make the choice that you really want if you have no idea what might come out of your choices?


I agree people need information, and faulty information is bad. I was still going along the lines of the assumption that the doc may have lied to her when I made said statement, Thus it being evil, and thus the lady probably not being well informed. However she still made a choice, and choices are good. After all even when we are children our parents allowed us to make small bad choices so that we could learn to never make that choice again.

We all have the right to choice, it is a major part of the right to freedom, The lady thus at all times had the right to make her choice, despite if the doc was lying to her. And if the doc was lying to her, its the doc who should get into trouble, visa vi medical crimes.

I hope that clears up the intent.
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:34 pm


Not all choices are good. Even you shoudl know this. I can go thorugh out history an a huge list of bad choices people made. Our parents let us make bad choices to teach us, yes, but i don't ever remember them lettign their children make the choice to kill another human life.

Tiger of the Fire


I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Tue Aug 08, 2006 3:55 pm


Yeah... I was gonna say, yeah, my mom and dad let me make some mistakes. But they never let me -kill- someone.

Choices are important, but when it comes to affecting someone else's life in a damaging/fatal way, some choices shouldn't be legally made.

Which, I'll point out, means that the fetus gets off scott free: The fetus did not -choose- to affect the mother, damaging or no. As ya'll are so keen to point out, fetii can't choose things because they lack the mental capacity.
Reply
The Pro-life Guild

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum