Welcome to Gaia! ::

The thing with geniuses is that they most likely are smart enough to understand tact when it comes to people. Bragging all the time doesn't benefit them in any way.

For argument's sake let's say I'm talking about a fictional character and not myself here (aka hypothetically): Sometimes I just get sick of pointing out how people are wrong and arguing against people that refuse to acknowledge your point. Some people will go as far to insult your intelligence. Stating that you know your i.q. score to be well above normal or something along those lines is very easy to do. It's a cheap, cop-out, but I get sick of putting up with people who are just stubborn for the sake of being stubborn. I'm very stubborn myself, but I'm really trying to get to the root of something.

As far as stereotype geniuses, I don't feel your view is very accurate. I live by a NASA base and have had an opportunity to be part of some of the programs they run there. Primarily among them I could see introverted tendencies. They were in an environment they feel safe in so they're a bit more extroverted while there. The thing about fitness does fit them a bit, but it appeared to be more of something they did because it was logical and aren't the athletic types. Exercise can be very beneficial to the brain so it is something desirable. The current brightest mind of our time is likely Steven Hawking and he certainly isn't athletic so it is not necessary.

I haven't met a girl that can have a deep conversation with me that fits your view, so I will merely disagree on that. My qualifications for what defines a deep conversation may be part of it or that it takes getting to know a person to have a deep conversation in most cases. I spout out random pieces of information while talking so I'd hope enough would stick to raise their intelligence (which I have noticed has happened with certain people I've known as they try saying back to me information I gave them in certain circumstances).

@Chief: Technically flamebait is a subcategory of troll, but more often than not, the term troll is defined as someone who causes people to take something stupid way too far to the point where it's funny to see them rage about it. Here's a good example of an epic rage that is the result of (rather amateurish) trolls.
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1919246

@red: For bragging, that's kinda my point. Most "geniuses" will either be seen as a complete idiot or an awesome genius. This is because they don't claim to be a genius and don't ask anyone to back them up when someone tries to insult them etc.

I also agree that sometimes you will get sick of people not acknowledging your point, but as for pointing out "how people are wrong", that's a bit iffy. I tend to point out how people aren't right but I don't go so far as to say that they're wrong. For example I explain how a Christian can't prove to me there is a god but I won't go so far as to say that they're wrong. On the other hand I can explain how an atheist can't prove to me that there is no god but again I won't go so far as to say that they're wrong. You could say that my religious stance is that of a strong agnostic but I consider labels to be the very reason that these petty arguments arise to begin with.

For NASA: Does working at NASA prove that you're a genius? Or does it merely show how good at science/math you are? (see other thread about intelligent design for more TL;DR details) Also I never said that said smart people are either introverted nor extroverted. It really depends on the person in that case. Some of them are extroverted in the sense that they go out and make people's lives easier by taking an otherwise complex idea and "dumbing it down" into an expression that is very easily understandable. Others are introverted and choose to use violence and petty rebellion/crime as their means of social interaction (though more often than not it is in a negative fashion which can hardly be seen as extroverted). Me I do a little bit of both. Or rather did a little bit of both. I seem to be leaning towards the former as of late. Oh and finally on this matter, Stephen Hawking not being physically fit might have something to do with his MS. Surprise surprise.

Back to the topic of deep discussion. I find that I can get into deep discussion with almost anyone. I just need to find out what it is they really care about. They don't have to be smart or a nerd either. They could be some random dude I met with an average intelligence level. The key is to portray it in a way that they can really understand. If you go around spewing all these big words and terminologies, of course they're not gonna be interested. For example: "According to Newton's law of conservation, matter and energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it can only be transferred from one body to another." vs. "You can't make something appear from out of nowhere and you can't make something just disappear into nothingness. You can only take it and make it into something else." One sentence seems like you're just trying to show off what you know and make the other person feel like an idiot using terminology that the common person may or may not understand. In the latter, you're putting it in a way that they can think about it, try it out for themselves, and realize why it makes sense. This is why I feel that the biggest measure of intelligence you can use is not how well you can receive questions and give proper answers, but rather how well you can teach others about a concept that they can learn well enough to teach someone else.

How they're dressed.

Although i'm not a biological male, i still spend a bit of time seeing women around in public.

If they're dressed with tits hanging out and skirts so short they're flashing everyone, my first thoughts are: Skank. ********. Other things like that. I like some modesty in a girl.

Though the little bit of cleavage in a V-neck top or some shorts that are just a little shorter than mid-thigh are good wink

Other than clothes, it's hair. Boldness and neatness with their hair is good. If it's fried or looks just over-done, it's not good.

HEY! I'm bi, so I'm just gonna answer this!:

What I notice about a girl first:
Her hair. I like nice hair, not frizzy everywhere that you can tell they don't know how to take care of. It shows how well the person can take care of themselves. And I like that independent factor of a lady. ^^;

What I am most attracted to:
Intelligence and Humor. I like a female with some smarts that she can put into her humor and everyday life like myself. It's really refreshing to find girls like that.

Her face.

So...how important is the boob to waist ratio? redface

My hubby's just getting...weird about my breasts not living up to their former post-preggers glory. I keep telling him the way to fix that is have another kid. He says "Let's just practice." ninja

heh. he can remember that beggers can't be choosers. =w=

though I can understand some of his worry, I think.

1.) another baby would be another mouth to feed, and so far I recall you guys were having spats about money already.

2.) it's possible he's nervous about bringing up two little ones at once, and at such dramatically different ages when the needs are completely different, so that he'd rather wait until the child you already have is at least mildly self-sufficient enough for you guys to focus more on the one.

and 3.) there is the fact that he's the cautious type, and with his background I wouldn't be surprised if he still worries he'll "mess up" as a father. silly though that is. sweatdrop it's a guy thing.

but yeh. ninja if I had a Wife that would be willing to have another Baby so as to also refresh her Breasts and become Milkable, then IRS be damned, I'd ask her what in the Nine Hells she's waiting for! xd