Welcome to Gaia! ::

zOMG! Chatterbox

Back to Guilds

Do you like zOMG? Do you like to chat? Then click here. It will be the best decision you make. Ever. EVER!!11oneoneone 

Tags: zOMG, Chatterbox, Landshark, Marshall, Animated 

Reply Serious Discussion
"Respect others beliefs" ... "No. Not this time" Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

CH0Z0
Crew

PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:44 pm


Valheita
Misser Godiva
SlamuelBTP
What are 'beliefs'?

I don't tolerate any values that conflict with mine. When our dear president Barack Obama said that we cannot impose our values on Middle Eastern countries with different ones, I was ready to tear my hair out. I mean, I believe in equality, truth, freedom, et cetera, for everyone. If Afghanistan's, or Iran's, or Pakistan's, or China's, or North Korea's governments don't believe these inalienable rights are any good for them, well then they don't deserve to talk about anything to the US. I'm really tired of America not pushing her agenda.

On the other hands, with abstract, philosophical stances such as God and whether we really exist, I really couldn't give a damn.

Wait, what does 'respect' mean in this context? sweatdrop


No, we should not do any thing of the sort!

Unless we plan on actually taking over the country, we have no right to say what they can and can not do!
I disagree.

We have every right to tell Korea that they can't blow up other countries with nuclear weapons.

People get on the U.S. for just having deactivated nuclear weapons, yet we're not allowed to tell someone that is making these weapons only to use them for warfare that its a bad idea? Well hmph.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 9:47 pm


A bunch of you are, no offense, seriously naive. Every country claims that they are the best. OF COURSE YOU THINK YOUR COUNTRY'S WAYS NEED TO BE EVERYONE'S WAYS! America was thinking they were perfect, always. Even with the slavery. Even with denying women the vote. Even with the interim camps they made. Even with the Israeli conflict, where 1 million are trapped between Egypt that doesn't help them, and illegally established and military-enforced posts that prevent all a small amount of humanitarian aid into the region.

But forget my personal opinions, because I know most of you will rationalize it as "Oh they're all terrorists they deserve it" or "If we treat them like humans they'll kill us". Forget the things that I personally don't approve of.
Are any of you willing to believe that there could be something you don't believe in could possibly be the truth? That something you take a fundemental stand against could possibly NEED to be what is done? No, and neither are the people that disagree with you.

Iraq? Do you think it's okay to blow an entire country to shambles and leave them? The quality of life was worse when we initially came in, even with the dictatorship that Saddam had instilled. To just leave because it is starting to be a pain in our asses is to tell all those people who lost their homes and families that it just isn't worth helping to give back what we took from them. It's selfish. You make a mistake and you fix it. If you don't fix it, you can't claim to be the defenders of justice and all that crap.

Fighting the Koreans and their nukes is a big deal. It has to be done, even if it is done by the idiots in Washington. Just like stopping nukes is an obligation, however, so must we stop genocide in Darfur or Russia or even in Turkey (I'm turkish, so it's a big deal I'm saying this). And quite frankly, just like we need to stop people like Saddam from imposing his will upon the people of the country, we need to stop idiots that would impose their will on other countries.

Also, I'm offended by Vajapocalypse's connection of imposing the "American way" on the middle east and stopping North Korea. These are seperate issues, and your reply reeks of a lack of actual knowledge on the subject. Allowing an Islamic government to rule in an area of mostly Muslims will not give NK any boons to starting nuklear warfare.

But, oh, maybe I'm biased. MY mother being born and raised in America as a Christian and converting to Islam by her own realization of the futility of the current mindset, and my dad being an immigrant from Turkey that supported the right to follow religion in a country that is now so strict against Islam that a woman is not allowed to cover in colleges, perhaps I'm a bit biased. I don't have the rights you guys have, because I'm a muslim. I shouldn't have the right to support the government that follows the same ideology that I live by because you guys have your government that follows your ideology. The fact that America was founded by Christian principals is perfectly okay, but a country that attempts to honor the ideas of it's people like yours did isn't allowed, since we aren't you. We're us, so it's okay to drop a hecka bombs and claim victory a day later, because there never was a goal in the first place.

I must be biased. Also will edit any mistakes I find, now that I'm done.

AHMETRock


Vajapocalypse

PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:14 pm


AHMETRock

Also, I'm offended by Vajapocalypse's connection of imposing the "American way" on the middle east and stopping North Korea. These are separate issues, and your reply reeks of a lack of actual knowledge on the subject. Allowing an Islamic government to rule in an area of mostly Muslims will not give NK any boons to starting nuklear warfare.

Where the ******** did you get that?

Original post by BTP brought up NK, the Middle East and pushing America's values. Misser Godiva said we shouldn't say what another country can and cannot do in response to his post. I questioned her about that on a specific subject of extreme importance (NK having nukes and giving them the middle finger to the UN). Now, where did I say anything about muslims giving NK the ability to start a nuclear war? Oh that's right I didn't. Nor did I say anything about their being a connection between the two. So how about before you call me out and insult my intelligence, read the subject.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:22 pm


Not insulting your intelligence, but your short reply implicates a connection. Also, I'd like to point out I kick puppies as a hobby.

AHMETRock


Vajapocalypse

PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:27 pm


AHMETRock
Not insulting your intelligence, but your short reply implicates a connection. Also, I'd like to point out I beat women as a hobby.

How so? You're so adamant that the connection I made was soooooooooo offensive, so tell me how does a short reply to a convo that makes a reference to totalitarian countries translate to my short reply say "allowing an Islamic government to rule in an area of mostly Muslims will [edited out for obvious reasons] give NK any boons to starting nuklear warfare"?

And since I'm just an ignorant American I feel obligated to fix your post.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:11 pm


AHMETRock
A bunch of you are, no offense, seriously naive. Every country claims that they are the best. OF COURSE YOU THINK YOUR COUNTRY'S WAYS NEED TO BE EVERYONE'S WAYS! America was thinking they were perfect, always. Even with the slavery. Even with denying women the vote. Even with the interim camps they made. Even with the Israeli conflict, where 1 million are trapped between Egypt that doesn't help them, and illegally established and military-enforced posts that prevent all a small amount of humanitarian aid into the region.

But forget my personal opinions, because I know most of you will rationalize it as "Oh they're all terrorists they deserve it" or "If we treat them like humans they'll kill us". Forget the things that I personally don't approve of.
Are any of you willing to believe that there could be something you don't believe in could possibly be the truth? That something you take a fundemental stand against could possibly NEED to be what is done? No, and neither are the people that disagree with you.

Iraq? Do you think it's okay to blow an entire country to shambles and leave them? The quality of life was worse when we initially came in, even with the dictatorship that Saddam had instilled. To just leave because it is starting to be a pain in our asses is to tell all those people who lost their homes and families that it just isn't worth helping to give back what we took from them. It's selfish. You make a mistake and you fix it. If you don't fix it, you can't claim to be the defenders of justice and all that crap.

Fighting the Koreans and their nukes is a big deal. It has to be done, even if it is done by the idiots in Washington. Just like stopping nukes is an obligation, however, so must we stop genocide in Darfur or Russia or even in Turkey (I'm turkish, so it's a big deal I'm saying this). And quite frankly, just like we need to stop people like Saddam from imposing his will upon the people of the country, we need to stop idiots that would impose their will on other countries.

Also, I'm offended by Vajapocalypse's connection of imposing the "American way" on the middle east and stopping North Korea. These are seperate issues, and your reply reeks of a lack of actual knowledge on the subject. Allowing an Islamic government to rule in an area of mostly Muslims will not give NK any boons to starting nuklear warfare.

But, oh, maybe I'm biased. MY mother being born and raised in America as a Christian and converting to Islam by her own realization of the futility of the current mindset, and my dad being an immigrant from Turkey that supported the right to follow religion in a country that is now so strict against Islam that a woman is not allowed to cover in colleges, perhaps I'm a bit biased. I don't have the rights you guys have, because I'm a muslim. I shouldn't have the right to support the government that follows the same ideology that I live by because you guys have your government that follows your ideology. The fact that America was founded by Christian principals is perfectly okay, but a country that attempts to honor the ideas of it's people like yours did isn't allowed, since we aren't you. We're us, so it's okay to drop a hecka bombs and claim victory a day later, because there never was a goal in the first place.

I must be biased. Also will edit any mistakes I find, now that I'm done.

1: Actually, yes. Instead of giving bullies new toys to blow stuff up with I'd rather leave them ruined after they screw up. We're defenders of justice NOT BABYSITTERS.
2: If we can't have nukes because they make fun of us then they sure in HELL aren't gonna have nukes made for nothing but war.
Equality means your gonna have just as many (or few) nukes as we do. I sure hope I'm not elected president because I'm one of those hardcore 40's Americans, and all that squabbling of the figureheads with edited baseball hats would be ended in one week flat, as violently as necessary. Of course if I were president and war affairs were up to me, every wrongdoing country in the world would probably call us the Relentless justice Borg and hide under a rock. Don't mess with my America.

CH0Z0
Crew


Valheita

Vicious Nerd

10,900 Points
  • Timid 100
  • Nerd 50
  • Battle: Mage 100
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:11 am


AHMETRock... Lets see, where to begin..

I'm going to type this in a hurry, so I apologise in advance for misunderstandings and whatnot.

I do not believe my countries ways should be everyone ways. My country is small, it's ways will not work for a large country. More over, I do not believe all Muslims are terrorists, and I certainly don't believe that any man should be treated as less because of his/her religion.

With regards to Iraq, pulling out is the only sensible thing to do. It sucks that the Iraqi people will suffer, but there's no other option when the populace rebels against them. You -cannot- rebuild a hostile society. Defenders of justice or not.

Fighting the Koreans is essentially very similar to the Iraq war, both cases, the justification is to disarm a threat to the west. Both counties have a dictatorship. Don't let your persecution complex cloud your judgement here. North Korea is the new Iraq. The only difference is that Korea actually has nukes, Iraq didn't.

At -no- point were -any- countries attacked purely because they were muslim. They were attacked (ostensibly) because they were a -threat-. Keep your religion out of political matters, and ditch the 'Oh, I'm muslim, so everyone hates me' attitude. Regardless of it's accuracy, it's unbecoming.

[/speakingbluntly]
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:12 am


Tell me how they were a threat. Tell me how Iraq was anything more than a scapegoat that America could channel their fear and hatred into after the events of 9/11. The fact the man was a dictator means nothing, there are far worse dudes running governments. Russia still dreams of imperial dominance, China is the Fricken "Red Menace", Iran has a holocaust denier as a president, Afganistan is currently in the hands of warlords that we trust for handing over innocent men as terrorists for gitmo detention.

Who are the bullies CHOZO? The only people we are arming are the military that we approved of being a democracy like us. The only way you can say we are arming bullies is that your continued ignorance about the actual facts of the issue is simply more ammunition for recruiting terrorists.

Do you think a terrorist is inherently evil? That you are born into a country with constant fighting, people you know being killed by people for other countries' benefit? Can you believe in them when they do not believe in you? I do not mean to advocate terrorism, but how the hell do you think Osama even got his power in the first place? How about the fact that we armed his overly militant islamic groups to fight Russia during the cold war, and once Russia was defeated we ignored the area. Oh, 50 years later they've turned on us. Oh well, let's just kill them. Let's not forget how during the Iraqi-Irani war, for an entire year we funded one side, and then the next year we funded the other side. Much like the "100 Years War", while having a very large death toll, ended up ultimately strengthening both countries.

DAMMIT, WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU FACTS? EVERYTHING I CLAIM CAN BE FOUND RECORDED IN BOOKS. ASK YOUR HISTORY TEACHER, AND THEY CAN CONFIRM IT. YOU ARE JUST LISTENING TO WHAT THE MEDIA AND POLITICIANS MOUTH FEED YOU, AND IT IS DOING NOTHING BUT HARM FOR BOTH YOU AND THOSE THAT ARE BEING ATTACKED.

Your America is a stupid America. It is no different than any other dictatorship, except that you believe you are right, which everyone does. If you get your America, I, along with anyone else with half a brain, will be your opposition. Might I remind you that the American Revolution was fought over the ability to have adequate representation in the government, as brittain treated them as second class citizens. Your idea of patriotism defies the very spirit of the movement that it was founded. Go read over the text of the constitution and the bill of rights again. It's an interesting read.

Now, Val, I would rather the troops be pulled out of Iraq because they're doing more harm than good right now. My point is that America SHOULDN'T have quit. You need to think of these things. The dude that claimed that it would not take months but years in Iraw was forced to resign, remember that? No one wanted to listen. However, any country that wishes to base even some sort of law on Islam has been heavily opposed, to the point where only radicals can pursue the position. It was said at first that Iraq would not be allowed to have things from the Kuran as part of law, and after a few months, when they people had protested enough to show they WANTED it, Bush caved and said if that's what they wanted, that is what they would get. Also, I apologize for seeming unbecoming. It is just that the media de-humanizes us. I wanted people to know that we are people with feelings too, not some sort of enemy. I won't do it again, as that would be just annoying.

At Vaja: My apologies, sincerely. I attacked you when you didn't deserve attacking. You know how you click post a reply, and on the bottum you can scroll down to see the posts? Well I sorta combined yours with another persons, so that name drop wasn't neccessary at all. I've checked over it again and I'm not quite sure what I did. I use the highlight tool to scroll down and I must have did something to change where I was at, so I read things wrong.

I'd also like to make a disclaimer that even though I heavily oppose some of your political views and hope to change your ideas slightly for the better, I show no animosity towards any of you. Outside the threads where the topic is relevant, I will neither mention nor hold you responsible for any of your beliefs. You're all good conversation and if I didn't really care I wouldn't be posting. So if you end up hating me, I am sorry. Remember not to take it personally.

AHMETRock


CH0Z0
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:05 am


AHMETRock
Tell me how they were a threat. Tell me how Iraq was anything more than a scapegoat that America could channel their fear and hatred into after the events of 9/11. The fact the man was a dictator means nothing, there are far worse dudes running governments. Russia still dreams of imperial dominance, China is the Fricken "Red Menace", Iran has a holocaust denier as a president, Afganistan is currently in the hands of warlords that we trust for handing over innocent men as terrorists for gitmo detention.

Who are the bullies CHOZO? The only people we are arming are the military that we approved of being a democracy like us. The only way you can say we are arming bullies is that your continued ignorance about the actual facts of the issue is simply more ammunition for recruiting terrorists.

Do you think a terrorist is inherently evil? That you are born into a country with constant fighting, people you know being killed by people for other countries' benefit? Can you believe in them when they do not believe in you? I do not mean to advocate terrorism, but how the hell do you think Osama even got his power in the first place? How about the fact that we armed his overly militant islamic groups to fight Russia during the cold war, and once Russia was defeated we ignored the area. Oh, 50 years later they've turned on us. Oh well, let's just kill them. Let's not forget how during the Iraqi-Irani war, for an entire year we funded one side, and then the next year we funded the other side. Much like the "100 Years War", while having a very large death toll, ended up ultimately strengthening both countries.

DAMMIT, WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU FACTS? EVERYTHING I CLAIM CAN BE FOUND RECORDED IN BOOKS. ASK YOUR HISTORY TEACHER, AND THEY CAN CONFIRM IT. YOU ARE JUST LISTENING TO WHAT THE MEDIA AND POLITICIANS MOUTH FEED YOU, AND IT IS DOING NOTHING BUT HARM FOR BOTH YOU AND THOSE THAT ARE BEING ATTACKED.

Your America is a stupid America. It is no different than any other dictatorship, except that you believe you are right, which everyone does. If you get your America, I, along with anybody else stupid enough to think they can go making weapons nilly willy and insult our country and expect US to help them, will be your opposition. Might I remind you that the American Revolution was fought over the ability to have adequate representation in the government, as brittain treated them as second class citizens. Your idea of patriotism defies the very spirit of the movement that it was founded. Go read over the text of the constitution and the bill of rights again. It's an interesting read.

Now, Val, I would rather the troops be pulled out of Iraq because they're doing more harm than good right now. My point is that America SHOULDN'T have quit. You need to think of these things. The dude that claimed that it would not take months but years in Iraw was forced to resign, remember that? No one wanted to listen. However, any country that wishes to base even some sort of law on Islam has been heavily opposed, to the point where only radicals can pursue the position. It was said at first that Iraq would not be allowed to have things from the Kuran as part of law, and after a few months, when they people had protested enough to show they WANTED it, Bush caved and said if that's what they wanted, that is what they would get. Also, I apologize for seeming unbecoming. It is just that the media de-humanizes us. I wanted people to know that we are people with feelings too, not some sort of enemy. I won't do it again, as that would be just annoying.

At Vaja: My apologies, sincerely. I attacked you when you didn't deserve attacking. You know how you click post a reply, and on the bottum you can scroll down to see the posts? Well I sorta combined yours with another persons, so that name drop wasn't neccessary at all. I've checked over it again and I'm not quite sure what I did. I use the highlight tool to scroll down and I must have did something to change where I was at, so I read things wrong.

I'd also like to make a disclaimer that even though I heavily oppose some of your political views and hope to change your ideas slightly for the better, I show no animosity towards any of you. Outside the threads where the topic is relevant, I will neither mention nor hold you responsible for any of your beliefs. You're all good conversation and if I didn't really care I wouldn't be posting. So if you end up hating me, I am sorry. Remember not to take it personally.

Yes you are. Exactly my point. I'm borderline imperialistic, if I were you I'd sleep with my teddy bear closer after some of the stuff you said, since I never touched YOUR country, but you seem to sure hate mine, just like many other jealous people. And we are rearming bullies by rebuilding Iraq OBVIOUSLY, you don't come in and blow up someone's gun and then say sorry and rebuild it, not the way I do things. As for your american revolution comment, obviously I'm not gonna blow up people who are friendly, only those that deserve it and hinder the progress of the world, which even for me at the moment could maybe be... 3? 4 countries? Not that many compared to how many there are, but the ones you mentioned do look pretty dang close to my list, so good for you. The war of 1812 was my style on Britain's attempt to oppress people in the world even after we were a different country.
My thinking is, if they're nice, then good for them, maybe allies or something sometime, no reason to blow up those who actually don't deserve it. Insult us? Pfft you think you're gonna get any help? I'll have cameras up recording the next time you need our help to blackmail your leaders with IF THEY SURVIVE. And for stuff like 911? Everyone who helped cause it is going to die or be left for dead, simple as that, America is way too soft now about this kinda stuff since it's all "but there are blah blah blah" and the "we can't go in there and blah blah blah" well *yes* we can go in there in full retaliation and blow the crap out of them for attacking us, that's what any other country in the world would seriously do, we're like the only one who doesn't anymore. My thinking on this subject has NEVER changed, and it never will, my grandfather taught me about all I need to know about how government *should* work back when I was about 5 and continued until he died when I was about 13, give me info and I can make a decision. Also this will be my last time in the serious discussion subforum, I expressed my viewpoint and since it's unchangeable after hostility, this is, quite irrelevant.
tl;dr "oh my"
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:33 am


Alright, I'm not going to argue with you on this Cho. I think the irony of your statement will be lost on you, so I'm not going to bother explaining it to you here. I don't hate America, just people like you. Is killing okay because they are other countries? What if it was done by someone in your town?

Why is it, that if a man kills another man in battle it's called heroic; yet if he kills a man in the heat of passion, it's called murder?
Get the reference and you are awesome.
Do not think that being overly aggressive is what will protect you. As I mentioned before, Al Queda was essentially created by the Americans during the cold war. The hatred people feel within their hearts is due to being abandoned and bullied. I'm not shouting DEATH TO AMERICA, I'm telling you guys not to be so damn violent! Quit confusing the two, because if you are unable to admit when you do wrong.

I am not sure what your grandfather taught you, and I see no reason for me to argue about what he may have passed on to you. However, I can certainly take issue with what you say and seem to do. It just makes me sad that there are people like you that can't see the bigger picture.

NOW, YOU FAILED TO SUPPLY A REAL REASON THAT THE PEOPLE WERE THREATS. YOU HAVE NOT SUPPORTED THE CLAIM THAT YOU ARE ARMING BULLIES ASIDE FROM THE FACT THAT THEY MIGHT DISAPPROVE OF WHAT YOU HAVE DONE AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY BOMBED THEM.
Unless you can elaborate with more than just rhetoric, I refuse to respond to you on this topic. I apologize, but I want more than just your personal opinion when it comes to the millions of people that are being killed.

AHMETRock


Vajapocalypse

PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:22 am


I agree we had no right to go into Iraq (our beef was with taliban in Afghanistan). It was premature and there was no conformation that they had weapons of mass destruction. Iran on the other hand... well let's just say poor Bushy was one letter wrong when he sent the troops out.

Al Queda was already there we just gave them weapons because we thought it would help us and them. We still do it to this day with other countries. In fact, we still sell out dated plans and weapons to other countries. Don't blame America for helping out your overly aggressive fundamentalist extremist that your dictator at the time supported.

Reasons why Iraq was thought to be a threat:
1) They showed open distaste for America and supported the 911 incident
2) Saddam never said that they had weapons of mass destruction or that they didn't (It's just a cookie factory guys).

Quote:
Why is it, that if a man kills another man in battle it's called heroic; yet if he kills a man in the heat of passion, it's called murder?

Because it's the reason why and even then depending on who the man kills it's still considered murder. Mai Lai Massacre anyone? It's not murder as long as it falls in the guideline of rules of engagement.
Even in America that's not the case. You can get a reduced sentence for killing in the name of passion (extremely hard btw) but it's still murder and you'll still be punished. You accidentally hit someone with your car and they die, vehicular manslaughter.
Lets look at some muslim/ islamic state laws. To this day it's perfectly acceptable to commit an honor killing in those countries. It's perfectly acceptable to beat a woman just because you can see her wrists. It's perfectly acceptable to kill indiscriminately as long as it follows within the guidelines of the culturally accepted area.

Yes, those American bastards. How violent they are. Muslims are so innocent and never do anything wrong because it's in the heat of passion. You're right, AHMET, how could we all be so blind to the clear superiority of violence in the heat of passion and how muslims are just so innocent and free of sin. I for am sorry I ever questioned your religion or made jabs at it because I know see how it's so much better. God, I'm so enthralled by it I'm completely rethinking my own religious choices.
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:29 am


I'm turkish. They're a democracy, and an ally of America. Not Arabic, and I don't have any dictators, aside from the President of the United States of America, where I currently live.

Also, this isn't a matter of which side is right and which side is wrong. You cannot shove blame onto one side completely. Hitler gained his power because Germany was forced to take humiliating blame for WWI. Of course the people that do these evil things cannot be excused. However, the people of the world to need be vigilant against letting these ideologies spread. If both sides feel the need to claim the other is wrong, neither will ever settle anything.

Also, that was totally a Wayne's World quote. IT WAS A JOKE. We can all be internet buddies, even if we disaggre on politics.

AHMETRock


Vajapocalypse

PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 11:50 am


Ah, yes, because Turks have no history of violence either. It's all just those damn Americans. Never mind that Germany has had some problems with Turkey immigrants who believe in honor killings also (been a little issue in Germany in recent years).

Also, I never talked about your country, simply your religion and the places that are islamic countries.

Did I blame just one side? No, I said the US has made some bad moves.

Joke? Must you hide behind a joke? There's only been one sentence of yours that seemed like a "joke" and highly doubt it was.

When we're in the main guild forum I'll act as if nothing here happened but we're not out there. We are here and here I won't hold back just because we are internet buddies.
PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:00 pm


Good. Well, I think I admitted that there was the armenian genocide, so that's pretty much the biggest thing people know about us.

I'm not sure what we're arguing about anymore, I'm just making replies. Essentially, my points are that no one should believe their viewpoint is more important than anothers, no one should force them, and international needs and customs are so varied that we need to respect them, rather than impose our own. I mean, japan censors their porn. Who really wants censored porn?

AHMETRock


Vajapocalypse

PostPosted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 12:16 pm


It's the natural progression of an argument.

Right now we are more or less arguing about your assertion that America is overly violent as compared to other countries and groups of people. Which isn't true. Violence plagues every corner of the world.

Some viewpoints are better than others and they should be forced on people. Going back to how Muslims use the Quran to justify the killing, degradation and oppression of women is wrong and that needs to change.

North Korea thinking that they can say up yours to the UN and continue to test their nukes needs to be changed because of how mentally unstable their leader is.

America needs to get rid of this whole church in my law books. Land of religious freedom, keep your religion to yourself.

No, international customs shouldn't be respected to a certain extent. Now if we are talking about something that doesn't affect a group of people negatively like in your culture you eat pig testies then you're right it should be respected.

As far as porn being censored meh.
Reply
Serious Discussion

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum