|
|
|
|
|
Village Chieftain Smith generated a random number between
1 and 1000000000 ...
607739797!
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:31 pm
RAH RAH FIGHT THE POWUH!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:32 pm
I have never watched Guren Lagann I just know that song annoys the piss out of people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:33 pm
Ferregar Takayuki Mazogawa Arent accepting join requests and inviting people... You know... Not the same thing? Not in this context. Hence in the join request queue or otherwise. I'm sorry, but this right here, is total bullshit. They AREN'T the same thing and to say that they are, even with this contest going, is complete and utter nonsense. Accepting join requests DURING this contest doesn't mean that the people running within are doing anything AGAINST the rules. However, you would know if they INVITED someone purely for the sake of the vote to become captain. However, seeing as this isn't being done, ACCEPTING and INVITING are completely on different sides of the table and so say they aren't because of the contest just makes it seem like the contest is rigged or something or that you're only stalling because you don't want the person who has the most votes to be the captain of the guild. Hence, this being total bullshit from any other party and states that ACCEPTING and INVITING are the same thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:33 pm
Also I need to know this about Berzerker's... They are only capable of using skills in "RAG3" mode right? And I can make my own skills right? I'm kind of confused how that one doesn't really have a fine line.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:35 pm
DylanTheOgreSmith Also I need to know this about Berzerker's... They are only capable of using skills in "RAG3" mode right? And I can make my own skills right? I'm kind of confused how that one doesn't really have a fine line. They get rage mode, and any custom skills for rage mode that you can think of <.< Along with Bloodline abilities and/or talents.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:36 pm
Oh boy! My Mechinae Berzerker is going to be fierce as ******** then.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:38 pm
-Myst Nightclaw- Ferregar Takayuki Mazogawa Arent accepting join requests and inviting people... You know... Not the same thing? Not in this context. Hence in the join request queue or otherwise. I'm sorry, but this right here, is total bullshit. They AREN'T the same thing and to say that they are, even with this contest going, is complete and utter nonsense. Accepting join requests DURING this contest doesn't mean that the people running within are doing anything AGAINST the rules. However, you would know if they INVITED someone purely for the sake of the vote to become captain. However, seeing as this isn't being done, ACCEPTING and INVITING are completely on different sides of the table and so say they aren't because of the contest just makes it seem like the contest is rigged or something or that you're only stalling because you don't want the person who has the most votes to be the captain of the guild. Hence, this being total bullshit from any other party and states that ACCEPTING and INVITING are the same thing. When you accept someone's join request, you are inviting them into the Guild. This is the reason why I added "In the join request or otherwise." I use the word invite as the whole premise of bringing someone into the guild, or to the guild. I'd rather not argue wording. It is obvious given the events of the last election what the rule means, and why it was written.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:45 pm
Ferregar -Myst Nightclaw- Ferregar Takayuki Mazogawa Arent accepting join requests and inviting people... You know... Not the same thing? Not in this context. Hence in the join request queue or otherwise. I'm sorry, but this right here, is total bullshit. They AREN'T the same thing and to say that they are, even with this contest going, is complete and utter nonsense. Accepting join requests DURING this contest doesn't mean that the people running within are doing anything AGAINST the rules. However, you would know if they INVITED someone purely for the sake of the vote to become captain. However, seeing as this isn't being done, ACCEPTING and INVITING are completely on different sides of the table and so say they aren't because of the contest just makes it seem like the contest is rigged or something or that you're only stalling because you don't want the person who has the most votes to be the captain of the guild. Hence, this being total bullshit from any other party and states that ACCEPTING and INVITING are the same thing. When you accept someone's join request, you are inviting them into the Guild. This is the reason why I added "In the join request or otherwise." I use the word invite as the whole premise of bringing someone into the guild, or to the guild. I'd rather not argue wording. It is obvious given the events of the last election what the rule means, and why it was written. No, when you say "Okay" to a join request, it's accepting them into the guild. That's why there's the other option of INVITING people in the guild otherwise Gaia wouldn't have made such things and if you're really going to be that biased and hard headed about it, then perhaps someone else should be watching the voting and overseeing just what goes on with it. I mean, this is just you being awfully pigheaded about something that has an obvious difference to it. Like I said, you can see when someone is accepted to when they are invited. It's just that simple but you're taking something simple and turning it into a ball of knots that can't be undone without struggle and headache.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:46 pm
What was obvious was not inviting someone to the guild. If DG accepted a request that's entirely different. stare
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:50 pm
Can I start posting s**t inside of the Ranged Weapons Skills? I want to make Vulcan's a viable weapon. And maybe shoulder-mounted artillery... Hell you people need more weapons... <_<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:51 pm
Guys, just drop it. Myst, Taka, Dylan, anyone else that cares to listen to me. Just drop it. Clearly I can win two elections and still not matter. I only hope whoever ends up with the captains pot will see the hypocrisy in all of this and hand it over to where it belongs. There's still around 10 hours or so left to the election. I'm hoping I don't get DQ'd for upholding my duties as crew. I saw others accepting and followed. If I'm going to be punished for it than what the ******** ever. I might as well be punished for filling in all the gaps in the crew areas and all that jazz too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:52 pm
DylanTheOgreSmith Can I start posting s**t inside of the Ranged Weapons Skills? I want to make Vulcan's a viable weapon. And maybe shoulder-mounted artillery... Hell you people need more weapons... <_< No you have to get it approved first <.<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:53 pm
I WANT BACK-MOUNTED DEATHRAPEFISTDOOMCANNONS...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:53 pm
DylanTheOgreSmith I WANT BACK-MOUNTED DEATHRAPEFISTDOOMCANNONS... If they're balanced properly you might be able to have them <.<
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|