|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
wait...when you say OOG you mean the outlaw's guide to the galaxy right?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:21 pm
yay, I had the 600th post...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:48 pm
OOG should be OGG, my bad. it is the Outlaws guide to the Galaxy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:10 pm
id look it up on Wookieepedia, but its down apparently...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:13 pm
well crap.
at any rate thats where I found proof of its existance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:14 am
Nospai Deathous keep in mind, tho, that ties, ints, and tie bombers cost almost next to nothing. the empire's philosophy seems to be 'deploy en masse' at least when it comes to fighters. True enough. Even though they kind of tried to change things later like shielding Interceptors and things like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:52 am
but still, the normal tie-fighter is less expensive, and its just easier to mass-build i guess razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:04 pm
Robin the Aussie Nospai Deathous keep in mind, tho, that ties, ints, and tie bombers cost almost next to nothing. the empire's philosophy seems to be 'deploy en masse' at least when it comes to fighters. True enough. Even though they kind of tried to change things later like shielding Interceptors and things like that. It really didn't catch on in the TIE line though. Most shielded ties, like the Defender and Advanced were just too expensive. That's why the Howlrunners and A-9 Vigilances had a shot at some imperial bases, since they did have shields, but unfortunately, did not perform so well to replace the cheap TIE...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 1:05 pm
what did the imps end up using before the reminant was crushed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 2:31 pm
they did adopt howlrunners, tie interceptors, normal ties, and schimtar assault bombers, i think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:50 pm
Question: you know how in World War 2, a lot of planes had bikini-clad women painted on them? Well, would there be any regulations against such being painted on, say, an x-wing or Jedi Starfighter? I was thinking that for Shards, Mordranna would have a faerie painted on her fighter. A little something to personalize it for her. ^^  I had something akin to that in mind. heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 6:22 pm
go for it AC
and Cale, the Remnant was never 'crushed', they still exist to this day, with their own space and stuff.
They did have Howlrunners, and most likely a range of TIEs, because we know they had regular TIEs, Interceptors, Bombers/Scimitar Bombers, and Defenders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:45 pm
Did defenders cease production, or are they still produced? if they aren't, i can't imagine there'd be too many left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
