Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Religious Tolerance
Mormonism Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Book Of Mormon anyone?
  I've read it.
  I never intend to read it.
  I'd have to learn a bit more about it before I read it.
View Results

A Murder of Angels
Captain

PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 6:30 pm


Conan The Barbie Doll
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't Mormonism a cult? I once read that somewheres...Probably somewheres in Gaia, in fact. sweatdrop

It depends on the definition you choose to follow. In this guild, we perfer not to refer to any religion as a cult because it carries negative conotations.

That being said, Mormonism CAN be considered a cult by the majority of definitions of the word. However, almost every religion can be considered to have cult-like origins. Think of this... Back when Christianity was brand new, the Romans declared it a cult and persecuted it furiously, killing hundreds of thousands.
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:27 pm


Dorkfishy
A Murder of Angels
I have a few more questions, Kipluck (or whoever else wants to answer)

EXCELLENT Questions. Please, someone answer them.


Sorry, I have just been super busy and sick lately! Trying to get to these now (best as I can) wink

A Murder of Angels
First, I understand from looking at the very opening pages of the Book of Mormon that there were originally four distinct groups of plates that were in one way or another involved with the Book of Mormon. They are the Large (secular) and small (spiritual) plates of Nephi, the plates of Mormon which are an abbridgement of the large plates of Nephi, the plates of Ether which are an account of the Jaredites, and brass plates that contained the Torah and a history of the Jews.

I don't quite understand what plates comprise the individual books in the Book of Mormon. Why is there a need for an abridgement of the original and full accounts?

From what I understand, the original records were not just expansive but repetitive. A lot of the people wrote about the same things. Since they were ALL of the historical records of those people there was basically probably a LOT of journals, most of which were not really important for future people (like us) to know about. It wasn't just an abridgment of a book into a shorter book... but walls and walls of records into a book. Plates, scrolls, etc. Much of it was probably copies of records that were also parts of what we now have in the Bible (another reason not to include that stuff)

When Moroni, the last writer in the book, was being hunted down (all his people were, it was that more "portable" abridged record he was carrying with him. He would not have been, and could not have been, carrying around the library it started as. So he hid that and some other stuff he had ON him, in the ground.


A Murder of Angels
Also, if Mormon had the original plates to abridge, why weren't they included with the bundle of plates that Moroni burried? Do we know anything about what happened to the plates not directly included in the Book of Mormon?

Yeah, more than just a bundle or 2, he could not have had them with him on the run. But as for what HAPPENED to the records he left behind (not the doctrines, since we believe those got "covered" eventually by the Bible or Book of Mormon, etc., but the actual RECORDS themselves?) there are probably scholar people that know more about that stuff... places they may be in South America and such... but I do not know much about archeology. I wish I did. I will have to look into some of that stuff. I have heard a LITTLE, like the "Lehi stone" and other weird stuff before, but don't know much about it myself.

A Murder of Angels
Also, I heard that after Joseph Smith finished transcribing the Book of Mormon, and after Moroni took back the plates, the original transcript of the Book of Mormon was somehow lost or destroyed. After this, Jospeh Smith rewrote the entire thing again, from memory. Is this what truly happened? What is the Mormon view on the accuracy of that "second take"?

This MIGHT be what you were talking about, though he did not rewrite it from memory (even had JS WROTE the book instead of translated writing it again in that short of time would have been quite a feat... heck THAT might be considered a miracle as well! Ha!), This article talks about many of the changes in the editing of the Book of Mormon including a part that was destroyed.

Quote:
The Prophet Joseph Smith did not leave us a detailed account of the daily translation process of the Book of Mormon but said it was accomplished through the "mercy of God, by the power of God." (D&C 1:29.) His usual procedure was to dictate to a scribe while he translated from the plates. Oliver Cowdery was the principal scribe and was assisted by Martin Harris, Emma Smith, probably John Whitmer, and an additional unidentified person. The words on the manuscript were essentially the Prophet's, but each scribe wrote them down in his or her own spelling variations.

Spelling was not as standardized in those days as it is now, and many felt at liberty to vary the way they formed words. 3 For example, in what is now I Nephi 7:20, ware sorraful in the manuscript was changed to were sorrowful in the first printed edition. Plaits in the manuscript (1 Nephi 13:23) became plates in the printed edition. These and similar changes show why editing was necessary to make the manuscript more understandable.

The document these several scribes produced as they wrote at the Prophet's dictation is the original manuscript of the Book of Mormon in English translation. It was completed about 1 July 1829.

Then Oliver Cowdery was directed by the Prophet to make a second copy. This he did, writing most, but not all, of it himself. This manuscript is called the "printer's" or "emended" manuscript. It was made before any printing was attempted.

The original manuscript has not survived intact; it became watersoaked while stored in the cornerstone of the Nauvoo House, and about two-thirds of it rotted away. The 144 remaining pages, in the Church vaults in Salt Lake City, contain most of 1 Nephi; a portion of 2 Nephi 1; portions of Alma 11 and 19; Alma 22-63; parts of Helaman 1-3; and part of 3 Nephi 26.4 The printer's manuscript, on the other hand, is in good condition. It is a part of the collection of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Independence, Missouri.


Is that the thing you are talking about?

I will have to look into it. Anyway, the article itself pretty much covers the idea of "second takes" I suppose. I have no problem, personally, with the manner it was done, obviously. xd

Conan The Barbie Doll
Forgive me if I'm wrong, but isn't Mormonism a cult? I once read that somewheres...Probably somewheres in Gaia, in fact. sweatdrop


Well...
Quote:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
cult /kʌlt/ P[kuhlt] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun
1. a particular system of religious worship, esp. with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
THEN YES! rofl

In all seriousness, people tend to call something a Cult because it differs from themselves. Not exactly what the religious tolerance guild is about. However, this cracks me up.

Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0

choirofsteeloranges

PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2007 5:47 pm


I think it's a fascinating religion.

I've read like, the first page of the Book of Mormon. XDD But I've been to Mormon services, so I kind of know how they function and what they believe in.
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:29 am


I beleive that the Book of Mormon is a lie. That's what I think, however biggrin

mazuac

4,500 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Statustician 100
  • Contributor 150

Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 11:42 pm


mazuac
I beleive that the Book of Mormon is a lie. That's what I think, however biggrin
As is your prerogative.

I believe it is truth. hee hee. But that is just what *I* think. blaugh

However, might I ask, did you read it and determine the principles it taught were lies? Or do you simply believe the history of where it came from to be a lie? Or do you believe the principles and stories in it are lies based on what yopu have been told about them, not having read it?

I am not criticizing... I really an curious what you mean (and promise not to try to cram it down your throat or insist you believe one word of it.)
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:40 pm


Kipluck
mazuac
I beleive that the Book of Mormon is a lie. That's what I think, however biggrin
As is your prerogative.

I believe it is truth. hee hee. But that is just what *I* think. blaugh

However, might I ask, did you read it and determine the principles it taught were lies? Or do you simply believe the history of where it came from to be a lie? Or do you believe the principles and stories in it are lies based on what yopu have been told about them, not having read it?

I am not criticizing... I really an curious what you mean (and promise not to try to cram it down your throat or insist you believe one word of it.)

Oh, I know, but from what I have researched and found out, it's not in favor of the book. First of all, *most* mormons beleive that the Book of Mormon is holier and more right than the bible. Call me a critic, retard. whatever, but that's what I've read. Along with that, it has been edited over 80 times and you (as in the mormons) beleive that the current leader of God is a prophet. Along with that, there is no archeological (sp?) evidence of what has happened to back it up, espicially the giant war that is mentioned in the Book of Mormon. And did you know that the man who made the book of Mormon was a known liar and practiced magic?

mazuac

4,500 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Statustician 100
  • Contributor 150

A Murder of Angels
Captain

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:29 pm


mazuac
Oh, I know, but from what I have researched and found out, it's not in favor of the book. First of all, *most* mormons beleive that the Book of Mormon is holier and more right than the bible. Call me a critic, retard. whatever, but that's what I've read. Along with that, it has been edited over 80 times and you (as in the mormons) beleive that the current leader of God is a prophet. Along with that, there is no archeological (sp?) evidence of what has happened to back it up, espicially the giant war that is mentioned in the Book of Mormon. And did you know that the man who made the book of Mormon was a known liar and practiced magic?


Allow me to answer this from my own point of view as a non-believing Mormon sympathizer. Kipluck may have different answers for you...

On the Book of Mormon being more right than the bible, they believed that was because our translation of it came directly from the prophet, whom had the power to provide a clear, precise work directly as God intended. It was not "watered down" or corrupted like the bible had become over many years of re-translation. In fact, Joseph Smith, the prophet, created his own translation of the bible to attempt to reverse some of these bad translations and make it "more correct"again.

On there being 80 edits to the Book of Mormon, according to wikipedia there were, in fact, over 4000 changes made to it since it's publication. About 3000 of these were just spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, but sometimes wording WAS indeed changed. The LDS church does not shy away from this fact however, had has released recent publications that contain the original manuscript.

In reguards to the leader being a prophet, that is correct. With the creation of Mormonism, god brought back apostolic succession, which is similar to what Catholics use to elect their pope. However, Catholics (and all Christians) strayed from the true path, so God needed to give that authority to a new line of believers. If you don't know what it is, apostolic succession is passing leadership down amongst the priesthood.

As for archeology, I don't know anything about this, but wikipedia has a great article about it written from a neutral perspective. biggrin

The only true fact I can say about Joseph Smith being a magic user is that Joseph Smith was a known "treasure hunter" before writing the Book of Mormon. There's accounts of him "divining" where to find treasure. Beyond that, there's no reliable sources that speak on him using any kind of magic.

But I do request that you please be careful when calling anyone a liar in this guild, especially the leader of a religion, since insulting them may offend many members. Also, when making broad accusations, it would be helpful to back them up with sources. Mormonism has way too many rumours surrounding it, resulting from non-practitioners spreading hearsay.
PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:36 pm


A Murder of Angels
mazuac
Oh, I know, but from what I have researched and found out, it's not in favor of the book. First of all, *most* mormons beleive that the Book of Mormon is holier and more right than the bible. Call me a critic, retard. whatever, but that's what I've read. Along with that, it has been edited over 80 times and you (as in the mormons) beleive that the current leader of God is a prophet. Along with that, there is no archeological (sp?) evidence of what has happened to back it up, espicially the giant war that is mentioned in the Book of Mormon. And did you know that the man who made the book of Mormon was a known liar and practiced magic?


Allow me to answer this from my own point of view as a non-believing Mormon sympathizer. Kipluck may have different answers for you...

On the Book of Mormon being more right than the bible, they believed that was because our translation of it came directly from the prophet, whom had the power to provide a clear, precise work directly as God intended. It was not "watered down" or corrupted like the bible had become over many years of re-translation. In fact, Joseph Smith, the prophet, created his own translation of the bible to attempt to reverse some of these bad translations and make it "more correct"again.

On there being 80 edits to the Book of Mormon, according to wikipedia there were, in fact, over 4000 changes made to it since it's publication. About 3000 of these were just spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors, but sometimes wording WAS indeed changed. The LDS church does not shy away from this fact however, had has released recent publications that contain the original manuscript.

In reguards to the leader being a prophet, that is correct. With the creation of Mormonism, god brought back apostolic succession, which is similar to what Catholics use to elect their pope. However, Catholics (and all Christians) strayed from the true path, so God needed to give that authority to a new line of believers. If you don't know what it is, apostolic succession is passing leadership down amongst the priesthood.

As for archeology, I don't know anything about this, but wikipedia has a great article about it written from a neutral perspective. biggrin

The only true fact I can say about Joseph Smith being a magic user is that Joseph Smith was a known "treasure hunter" before writing the Book of Mormon. There's accounts of him "divining" where to find treasure. Beyond that, there's no reliable sources that speak on him using any kind of magic.

But I do request that you please be careful when calling anyone a liar in this guild, especially the leader of a religion, since insulting them may offend many members. Also, when making broad accusations, it would be helpful to back them up with sources. Mormonism has way too many rumours surrounding it, resulting from non-practitioners spreading hearsay.

Oh, sorry, I didn't mean to call Kipluck a liar, but there have been accusations against Smith that he was not trustworthy and denied the fact that he had used a diving rod and other "diving" objects to find treasure. So... sorry about that... sweatdrop

mazuac

4,500 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Statustician 100
  • Contributor 150

Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:08 am


mazuac
Oh, I know, but from what I have researched and found out, it's not in favor of the book. First of all, *most* mormons beleive that the Book of Mormon is holier and more right than the bible. Call me a critic, retard. whatever, but that's what I've read.
We do believe that both the Bible AND the Book of Mormon are scripture and holy books, but yes, you are right in that as the Book of Mormon has been translated most RECENTLY it is more correct as is. The Bible has gone through a lot of changes since written as well. HOWEVER, if translated CORRECTLY the Bible and Book of Mormon are equal. And with so many different versions of the Bible available, generally, the King James Version is the one we accept as "cannon."

However, ummm, this is the Religious TOLERANCE guild. Why would I call you a retard just for disagreeing with me? First of all, you have every right to disagree with me. 2nd of all, we just don't attack each other like that here. This isn't the chatterbox. We act like adults... and we generally rather like each other, even if we differ in views! biggrin

mazuac
Along with that, it has been edited over 80 times and you (as in the mormons) beleive that the current leader of God is a prophet.
MoA answered that stuff as well as I could. Yes, there have been changes. We believe they were inspired and made to make things more clear to the original intent. I don't have a problem with that. And, yes, we definitely believe in the gift of Prophesy and that our current leader is a prophet, as have been the past leaders. We believe that is how God leads his church. It was how he lead his church in times past, then that was lost in time we call the apostasy, then it was returned to the earth with Joseph Smith. After that Brigham Young was called, and so forth.

mazuac
Along with that, there is no archeological (sp?) evidence of what has happened to back it up, espicially the giant war that is mentioned in the Book of Mormon.
See, now here I am just going to have to disagree with ya. Actually, I wish I knew more about this stuff because there is a TON of archaeological evidence to support the Book of Mormon, though, definitive proof is tricky since we don't know precise locations. One of the sites that compiles these (though I won't claim they are unbiased, but nonetheless, interesting) is Jeff Lindsey's http://www.jefflindsay.com/BMEvidences.shtml and one that does research themselves is through BYU-FARMS which is interesting IF you want to wade through the intellectualism and professor speak. http://farms.byu.edu/publications/bookofmormonview.php?subcat=100&cat=1

mazuac
And did you know that the man who made the book of Mormon was a known liar and practiced magic?
2 problems with this statement. 1. he was only a liar if you don't believe what he said and believe he didn't either. (so try to avoid inflammatory language, thanks. sweatdrop ) 2. Maybe what you call magic, I call miracles? I dunno. But I think it is possible he did try to use divining rods, or whatever. His family was impoverished for much of his life. The Lord would not even let him take the Gold Plates he was LEAD to for many years until he was ready for the responsibility. He was not a perfect man. But he WAS a prophet of the Lord.
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:31 am


Well other people's faith doesn't really bother me (religious tolerance, obviously, lol), but I think sometimes 'faith' gets mixed up with fear and people just think if they don't have faith in their religion and question things then they'll be punished or whatever because a lot of religious books say things like that. I think some people have more fear than they do actual faith.

Pinny Nickels


Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0
PostPosted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:37 pm


Penny Nickels
Well other people's faith doesn't really bother me (religious tolerance, obviously, lol), but I think sometimes 'faith' gets mixed up with fear and people just think if they don't have faith in their religion and question things then they'll be punished or whatever because a lot of religious books say things like that. I think some people have more fear than they do actual faith.
I agree. In fact, I see it in my OWN religion, which really annoys me. We are TAUGHT to question... to find out for ourselves... but some people act like questioning and studying is, like blasphemy or something. SCARY. How do they think God wants us to learn? We were MADE to ask questions... and yet, I hear some people acting as if DOING so is not not having enough faith.

I believe we are asked to find out as much as we can, and then, yes, sometimes we have to take things on faith awhile till we find the next answer... but that doesn't mean we DON'T ASK THE QUESTIONS!

Voluntary Stupidity does not equal RIGHTEOUSNESS.
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:57 pm


Just a newsworthy fact from the LDS church. Tonight our President and prophet, President Gordon B. Hinckley, died at the age of 97.

It shouldn't be a shock, but I admit it rather took me by surprise and I have been crying. He felt like not just a religious leader to me, but a Grandpa.

The expected new leader of the church is Thomas S. Monson.

Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0

-DiseaseFish-

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:15 am


User ImageI glimpsed a bat with butterfly wings...




This goes along with the whole "not investigating both sides of the church thing."

So, I live in the central boiling pit for mormon culture, you might say.
99% of my classmates ARE or HAVE been mormon for MOST of their lives.
I, however, am not.

I listen to music with expletives, I read about things like sex and drugs, and study literature and artwork that isn't always viewed as "appropriate" where I live. My phone number is CONSTANTLY being handed off to the local mormons, since, ya' know, I'm the only person within twenty miles who hasn't been converted.

Anywho, my friends-
I love them to death, and they're great, but when it comes to the things I choose to learn, read, listen to, and generally the person I choose to become, they kind of turn a blind eye. They pretend not to see it.
NOW, my point:
I have a good friend who, in her life, has listened to a broad range of DISNEY songs, and songs by TWO independent artists: Josh Groban, and Michael Buble.
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot. AND the Mormon Tabernacle choir.

She won't read a book if it has expletives, or mentions sex.
Artwork is too "graphic" for her most times, and so, she is QUITE ignorant of ART in general. (unless, of course, they are pictures of jesus emerging from the tomb.)

I'm just saying, I think it's sad that this is what the church has made my friend into. She will live for the church for the REST of her life. (this isn't necessarily a BAD thing, nuns....monks....they all do it.)
I just feel sad that I can't share this creative world with my friends.
Notice, I say FRIENDS, because 90% of them behave LIKE this.

Anyways, sorry. Just something negative I find about the church.
oh, what marvelous things.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 7:06 pm


-DiseaseFish-
User ImageI glimpsed a bat with butterfly wings...




This goes along with the whole "not investigating both sides of the church thing."

So, I live in the central boiling pit for mormon culture, you might say.
99% of my classmates ARE or HAVE been mormon for MOST of their lives.
I, however, am not.

I listen to music with expletives, I read about things like sex and drugs, and study literature and artwork that isn't always viewed as "appropriate" where I live. My phone number is CONSTANTLY being handed off to the local mormons, since, ya' know, I'm the only person within twenty miles who hasn't been converted.

Anywho, my friends-
I love them to death, and they're great, but when it comes to the things I choose to learn, read, listen to, and generally the person I choose to become, they kind of turn a blind eye. They pretend not to see it.
NOW, my point:
I have a good friend who, in her life, has listened to a broad range of DISNEY songs, and songs by TWO independent artists: Josh Groban, and Michael Buble.
Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot. AND the Mormon Tabernacle choir.

She won't read a book if it has expletives, or mentions sex.
Artwork is too "graphic" for her most times, and so, she is QUITE ignorant of ART in general. (unless, of course, they are pictures of jesus emerging from the tomb.)

I'm just saying, I think it's sad that this is what the church has made my friend into. She will live for the church for the REST of her life. (this isn't necessarily a BAD thing, nuns....monks....they all do it.)
I just feel sad that I can't share this creative world with my friends.
Notice, I say FRIENDS, because 90% of them behave LIKE this.

Anyways, sorry. Just something negative I find about the church.
oh, what marvelous things.
It's true. We give up some things... most of which I don't miss because it's just not that big of a trade for a closer relationship with God.

HOWEVER, sounds like your friends are missing out on more than most. I LOVE art, literature, and music, and I sure do not just mean pictures of Christ and MoTab CDs. But it is up to each of us to make that decision of WHAT is good, so, yeah. But I don't think a book is "bad" just because there are curse words.

Kipluck

5,850 Points
  • Beta Treasure Hunter 0
  • Beta Explorer 0
  • Beta Forum Regular 0

[Ashes][is][Ashes]

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:46 pm


I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
Therefore, I am a Mormon.
That doesn't mean that I automatically believe anything preached, or doctrine taught.
I choose what to believe, and what guidelines to live my life by, and for the most part my choices comply with the Church standard.
I do accept a lot of the teachings, and I accept them on Faith. My philosophy is that when something else better (or more reasonable/logical in my opinion) comes along, I may choose that over what I currently believe.
I do separate my religious beliefs from my scientific beliefs, on the basis that they don't always agree with each other.
Reply
Religious Tolerance

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum