|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:10 am
alohomora!
*lucca's belt unbuckles & falls to the floor* wink
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:15 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:17 am
eek
*his entire body stiffens & he topples to the floor* crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:17 am
Hmm I wonder what kinds of things engorgio works on <.< >.>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:25 am
Wow, I'd already thought up some less-than-clean uses for D&D spells, but Harry Potter spells? Wow, that opens up a whole new field...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:41 am
xD yay for HP fandom! xD and for the record, hermione was a bit ooc. too clingy and a bit punch-happy. xD i'm really hoping the GoF movie is better than PoA turned out to be.. stare the way i see it, PoA was a perfectly good movie, it was just a lousy HP movie. i'm really just excited about HBP this summer. ..and no more cho. xD
*waves a 'down with cho' banner in ravenclaw blue and copper*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:47 am
blue & copper? i thought they were blue & silver surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 10:51 am
shocktv3 blue & copper? i thought they were blue & silver surprised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:09 am
ah i see... hmm we need some hp avatar edits 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:12 am
Lucca gets all the pervy stuff done to her whee
No one cand o it the good old way; by using their hands xd Now a days its all this new fangled magic and wood trigs xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:15 am
Wow this is the first negative movie comments I have ever heard. I know most of the time either the book ruins the movie because they leave stuff out, or the movie ruins the book because now the characters are already cast and events have been set. But I have always been told that the harry potter movies were so perfect that they made the books even better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:22 am
the third movie is what got me to read the books.. so the next one will b the first movie where i know whats gonna happen. understandably, the books have much more included, which was a bonus for me cuz it was like gettin extra stuff after watchin the movies 3nodding
another thing is that the fourth book is much much longer than any of the previous three, and the first three movies were at least 2.5 hours long... i heard that they were initially thinkin of splittin goblet of fire into two movies but decided against it due to the actors' ages. so now who knows how much theyre gonna cut outta the book.
i just cant wait to see some gillyweed whee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2005 11:24 am
Judyfay Sins Wow this is the first negative movie comments I have ever heard. I know most of the time either the book ruins the movie because they leave stuff out, or the movie ruins the book because now the characters are already cast and events have been set. But I have always been told that the harry potter movies were so perfect that they made the books even better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
