|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 01, 2013 1:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 02, 2013 11:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 07, 2013 4:04 pm
|
|
|
|
Just some questions about battles! :3
I heard that when a non-battle class character buys a pair of knives to protect themselves, they receive battle stats, is that true?
If so, are they then allowed to participate in battles, despite not being able to fulfill a set requirement for their stage?
And if they are allowed to battle, would they be able to battle with characters in a battle class so that the character with a battle class requirement can fulfill that requirement?
For example, let's say that Natsu buys a knife and earns battle stats. Ogbonna (Or a completely different character that someone else owns) needs someone to practice with and no one with a battle class is available to do so. Thus, Natsu offers to help him by sparring with him using the knives that he now owns. Would something like this be able to happen?
Answer
Throwing knives and daggers are open to non-battle classes, and once purchased, they'll have to roll for stats in order to battle. They obviously don't have any battle reqs, so this is purely for fun.
They cannot however, battle with others to fulfill the other character's requirements. Battle class characters should fight with battle class characters for battles toward growths. Like I said previously, non-battle classes fighting is purely for fun, and the only upside is being able to gain EXP from it for both characters to use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 1:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 6:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Beast taming question!
Say a character wants to tame a creature and teams up with someone else to do it. Between the two of them, they tame the beast. Does it count against both of them, or only the person who is actually taming the beast- IE, the person keeping it? For example, Biroki and Lassarra team up to tame a Mammu. Would taming it count against BOTH of their counts, or only count against Biroki, who wants the mammu.
In that case, would it count towards Lass's beast battles?
Answer
I've added a little bit of info into the beast taming post about this, but one or both members can attempt to tame the beast they fought, but they have to roll individually. They will not get a bonus for taming with a friend, and the rolls for an individual must meet the goal to be suitable. (you can't use one roll from one person and one from another).
For the second part I'm not too sure what you mean, so I'll just answer what I think you're saying. If both fight and write their word count, they'll get a req point (per animal). Taming counts as part of the battle, so there is no extra req for trying to tame an animal. Actually getting the familiar is the reward for that, and you will receive exp even if you don't manage to tame. Only the person who rolls the winning roll will receive the familiar, but they can gift the familiar to whomever they want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:44 pm
|
|
|
|
Hey! Just some clarification about solos and such! :3
I've been writing short solos that are related to each other for most of my characters at the moment. I feel comfortable writing this way and it helps me not feel so overloaded with one big plot. It's like chopping a huge story line into smaller key points. However, my big question is how I would add these all together come time for growth. For example, here's something I have set up in my OOC thread, it's for Yaholo.
Hammer My Heart: 742 Cowardice, Thy Name Is Father: 884 Uncle Adohi: 548 Getting to Getting Along: 1250 Word count for set: 3424
The Calm After The Storm: 268 Lost Child: 895 Fatherly Thoughts: 809 A Plea To Aisha: 837 Wishes Answered, And Doubled: 154
Word count for set: 2963
Each "solo chunk" is related to the others that surround it, such as Getting To Getting Along and the two before it. However, they don't directly lead into the ones in the second "set", which is why they are treated separately and placed with others that are more "similar."
My questions are as follows:
Am I allowed to write like this and group the common "solo chunks" together?
The first set totals to 3424 words when together, am I allowed to count that set as three solos due to the word count?
If I am allowed to use 3424 words in this manner for three solos, is there a cut off to how many solos can be knocked out this way? Can I, say, make a set that, miraculously, comprises of 7000+ words when placed together, and completely knock out his solo requirement all at once? (Not that I would, but I'd like to know the limits to this, if any) Or, would that be considered cheating?
I was just wondering about this since I had already written them like this. If this isn't okay, I can go back to writing the big, long, block solos. |3
Answer
Solos do not have to be related to each other in order to bunch together. They just have to equal a total word count that equals the requirement. So for Yaholo, he just needs 7 solos aka 7000 words BUT each solo has to be at least 300 words. So the two smallest solos listed here wouldn't count toward the total necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 10:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 5:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 12:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|