|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:51 pm
Southern_cross_nemesis freelance lover MurrieGee Since we're talking about sex, I want to ask you guys view on sexuality. I was raised up that I didn't hear about Bi's or lesbian until I came to the United States. I could never imagine Adam with another Adam or Eve with another Eve. But now I have alot of gay friends. Christ says not to judge and I don't at all. But my bestfriend is bi and I've seen pastors on tv that are gay. Is it wrong.? What do you guys think about it? This is a pretty loaded question, and it all comes down to how you interpret scripture. I'm of the belief that the Bible doesn't say anything about homosexuality as it exists today (since it was a very different concept in Biblical times). Jesus certainly doesn't say anything about it, and all the references to homosexuality are about men, never women. Alright, My two cents time... Don't hate me for them... they are not shiny... razz Alright, the books of Bible was written by men, where their was women followers of Jesus, who wrote, but the monks that put all the books together, back in the Roman empire, decided to leave those books out. Which in my option, wasn't the smartest idea. But because the books that did make it in was those that was written by men, they was on the fears and concerns of men at the time of their scribe. Homosexuality, was one of those fears. How can you trust the guy next to you if he is eying you? There is also, the fear of being raped/sodomized. Eh... Those are my thoughts, take them... leave them... shoot them with a cheese shredder... I don't care. That's entirely possible. I don't know that I agree with it, but it's totally possible. I mean, how many time do you hear about a guy getting freaked out when his friend comes out? They're all worried their friend has been secretly checking them out and is in love with them, which is absurd. I'm certainly not attracted to every man I see, so why would a gay man be any different? It's just a basic fear and misunderstanding of someone who thinks differently, and that mindset is still prevalent today.
From what my research and readings have told me, most OT references refer to temple sex or orgies, meaning they technically fall under worship of another god. NT references are all from Paul, and may basically refer to being effeminate, which was a pretty terrible thing to be in Roman times. From that reading then, only the submissive person in the sexual act is considered in sin though, because the man is supposed to be dominant, so submitting like a woman is shameful. Paul's pretty hard to decipher anyway though sweatdrop
Basically what I was trying to get at in the first post was that neither of these readings have to do with homosexuality as it exists today. That is, the Bible does not condemn a long term, committed, loving relationship regardless of the sex of bother parties.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:13 am
Good input from everyone so far. I personally think one of the problems too is that our context of marriage is different than it was back then. Marriage back then was legal agrement primarily. The idea of marriage for romantic love is a rather modern concept, relatively speaking of course.
Southern Cross - This is the view that I take concerning the Bible myself.
Venus - I have problems with that myself. Fortunately my fiancee will remind me when I'm taking her for granted.
Freelance - Thank you for sharing that heart . Yes Paul is a hard one to figure out lol. What's helped me is examining the letters that we know he actually wrote and examining the historical context of the letters attributed to him such as Titus, 1 Timothy, and 2 Timothy. Marcion is central to understanding the context of the letters attributed to Paul since Marcion used Paul's letters as his canon.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:06 am
Why are certain sexual positions genderized? Why is a**l sex considered unmanly? Why do some consider masturbation to be unfeminine (I've heard this from some girls believe it or not)? Why does the type of sex one likes put one's gender and sexual preference into question?
I'll be frank I see myself as a heterosexual male. One of the sexual positions I do enjoy is being on the receiving end of a**l sex. I don't feel unmasculine or "less" hetero because of it but yet there seems to be this pressure that because I like this sexual position, I am somehow less manly or that I'm "in the closet" because of this. Granted there are attractive males out there, I'm just not sexually turned on by the male form. I guess this is more of a rant I wanted to get out more than anything.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 8:20 am
Honestly, I think that the whole a**l sex thing has had a bad rap. Anymore, with homosexuals being accepted for who they are, and people being more open about sexuality, that view is beginning to change.
Many guys I know have grudgingly admitted to enjoying having their a**s stimulated during sex, and it's no surprise. That is where the male's 'G-spot' is located (I know the g-spot is a debated topic). There is a bundle of nerves located just inside the a**s against the prostate, and many guys get a pleasurable sensation when it is stimulated.
Yet, I don't personally know any gals who enjoy a**l, as all their nerve bundles seem to be up front.
Maybe this is why guys have the stereotypical preoccupation with functions of the a** and stereotypically girls don't. Maybe it's because those functions stimulate that bundle a bit. I don't know, I'm just throwing that out there.
Besides, I only have my man as actual experience though, and he won't let me anywhere near his rear to check it out, though I can't say I haven't tried. I just want him to feel as good as he makes me feel. On the bright side, he isn't remotely interested in putting it in my a** either.
As to masturbation, until recently (say the last 30 to 40 years or so), women were supposed to maintain a certain dignified air about them. To admit to doing certain baser actions related to the more natural, animalistic side of our nature was degrading. Guys wanted 'classy' girls, because 'classy' girls could control themselves, and were considered safe marriage material... they probably didn't realize how those girls did keep control of their baser natures. wink
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:28 am
Eltanin Sadachbia Honestly, I think that the whole a**l sex thing has had a bad rap. Anymore, with homosexuals being accepted for who they are, and people being more open about sexuality, that view is beginning to change. Many guys I know have grudgingly admitted to enjoying having their a**s stimulated during sex, and it's no surprise. That is where the male's 'G-spot' is located (I know the g-spot is a debated topic). There is a bundle of nerves located just inside the a**s against the prostate, and many guys get a pleasurable sensation when it is stimulated. Yet, I don't personally know any gals who enjoy a**l, as all their nerve bundles seem to be up front. Maybe this is why guys have the stereotypical preoccupation with functions of the a** and stereotypically girls don't. Maybe it's because those functions stimulate that bundle a bit. I don't know, I'm just throwing that out there. Besides, I only have my man as actual experience though, and he won't let me anywhere near his rear to check it out, though I can't say I haven't tried. I just want him to feel as good as he makes me feel. On the bright side, he isn't remotely interested in putting it in my a** either. As to masturbation, until recently (say the last 30 to 40 years or so), women were supposed to maintain a certain dignified air about them. To admit to doing certain baser actions related to the more natural, animalistic side of our nature was degrading. Guys wanted 'classy' girls, because 'classy' girls could control themselves, and were considered safe marriage material... they probably didn't realize how those girls did keep control of their baser natures. wink Thank you for your input. And that's comforting to here. Just to contribute a bit, I know there are some girls that do like a**l sex. My fiancee tells me that it's usually "heavy set" girls that enjoy a**l sex mainly since that bit of "stomach" gets in the way of vaginal penetration and it's easier to reach the cliterous through a**l stimulation for these type of women with a**l sex. The most common problem with a**l sex is lack of lubrication since the a**s doesn't produce any "natural" lubricant. So yeah tip for anyone who want to try a**l, make sure you us lots of lubricant and still wear a condom. Stuff can "drip" and leak out into the v****a and cause pregnancy and since the a**s does not produce any lubricant, there's the risk of ripping the p***s or the a**s. On that note too, if you use sex toys make sure they are kept clean and any toys with tears in them are thrown out. Those tears are breeding grounds for bacteria.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 4:20 am
i think its really silly when people assume women dont materbate. of course we do, we just dont flaunt it around and brag about that sexy porn video we watched last night like alot of men do.
most porn though is geared towards men so it seems its still a big secret that women enjoy porn and masterbation rolleyes at least we have our romance novels with detailed sex scenes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2011 12:26 pm
I think people associate the bunghole to gays as people will so associate the cross with Christianity. It really is just that... association. Well, and this subject comes up at work a lot. ninja
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:01 pm
Here I just found something interesting. (I am not a polyamorist or what this site is about, was just interested in this specific topic of premarital sex because I've never been convinced that it's as horrible as many churches say]. bible and premarital sex
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 12:20 pm
maybe it would be better if I stayed single for the rest of my days...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 1:20 pm
Southern_cross_nemesis maybe it would be better if I stayed single for the rest of my days... I think once we're comfortable with who we are, being single or in a relationship doesn't matter so much. Although it could be argued that certain fulfillments aren't met outside of having a relationship. It could just be that I'm overlooking something at present. But you never know when you will find someone you just click with. And by click, I mean you may be a unique puzzle piece that has yet to find someone that just fits with you, but life is pretty random like that. One of my close friends was single for 27 years as a Christian. He never could find a woman he completely liked or got along with. And then he met an exchange student from Rome. They fell in love and have been married for close to ten years now. Anything's possible. 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 2:25 pm
Splendid Sailor Venus Southern_cross_nemesis maybe it would be better if I stayed single for the rest of my days... I think once we're comfortable with who we are, being single or in a relationship doesn't matter so much. Although it could be argued that certain fulfillments aren't met outside of having a relationship. It could just be that I'm overlooking something at present. But you never know when you will find someone you just click with. And by click, I mean you may be a unique puzzle piece that has yet to find someone that just fits with you, but life is pretty random like that. One of my close friends was single for 27 years as a Christian. He never could find a woman he completely liked or got along with. And then he met an exchange student from Rome. They fell in love and have been married for close to ten years now. Anything's possible. 3nodding If I am as unique as you say... this sucks... But, what I was referring to was the website, Ametrin, posted... I don't want to make someone feel trapped. Nor do I want to follow the same path everyone else in my family has done, got married and then divorced... the two sided coin and I feel that I might as well leave it be.. instead of taking my chances... The only reason I would want to be in any kind of relationship... is just for curiosity sake...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:09 pm
Every person who gets into a relationship with another person is going to have some sort of issue at some point in the relationship (more than once)... Nowadays, allot of people use divorce as an escape hatch, as opposed to learning to compromise.
Another scary trend I am seeing is that so many young people I have talked to just feel that their first marriage is going to automatically end in divorce anyway, and they just need to get that first one out of the way. Back in the day dating and being serious was for determining long term compatibility, and people were encouraged to sacrifice for their partner. Now, if someone has to sacrifice for the sake of making a relationship work, they are told by the majority of society and media that it isn't worth it.
My little cousins were hounding my a couple months ago about my husband's and my relationship. We don't wear our rings, and the youngest (9 years old) asked me how long Dave and I had been together. I told her 10 years. She then proceeded to ask if we were ever going to get married. Then the oldest (11 years old) cut in and answered her sister something along the lines of that Dave and I were probably not planning to get married so it would be easier for us to split when we didn't want to be together anymore... ti which they started arguing before I could get a word in.
I finally was able to tell them I had been married for 10 years, and the youngest said we couldn't be married if we didn't have rings. I laughed. Then she asked when I might expect to want to find a new man... to which I laughed... then the oldest answered that I was probably already looking, hence the absence of my ring... I didn't laugh anymore, and that was about the time I realized they were being absolutely serious, and that they had talked about me and Dave, and that they thought they had us figured out.
You see, my cousin married their dad (who is 16 years older than she is) when she was 16. She waited until she was 21 to have her first because her husband was really a decent and intelligent guy who thought it best that way, but who had unfortunately fell in love with her before she came clean and told him she was 15 at the time. By then, his heart was given, and she was determined to get out from under having to listen to adults... In her mid 20's, she realized she missed out on her childhood and started a downhill avalanche of her life ever since. She cheated, got pregnant, had to tell her husband, got divorced, and so forth and so on, and the girls have seen allot of drama in their few years.
After having a really serious discussion after they opened that door, I realized that this is a commonly accepted set reasoning among their peers. It is pumped into their heads with TV, the songs they listen to, books, and movies. My mother had custody of them for awhile at the end of last year, after their mom got busted for manufacturing meth with her boyfriend, and I got a really harsh reality check concerning the culture my kids are being raised in. To me, it makes it all the more important that I live a good example for them, and that I keep the paths of communication open with them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 4:33 am
i plan on doing anything and everything to keep my relationship going. i love my fiance and hope our relationship ever ends, and i also want to keep it going to prove to my grandmother hat i can be in a long term relationship and be happy. she is the type to bail on something as soon as it becomes the least bit difficult and i think she wants me to be like that too. we have been engaged for nearly 2 years now and that woman is still tellimg me where to meet men for when my relationship fails gonk
@ Ametrin im fine with sex before marraige so long as the people doing it are mature and responsable enough to handle what may happen afterwards. my sister is a teenager and she is having sex, but she is very responsable for her age and i trust that she is doing what she needs to. i waited until i was 20 because i wanted to make sure my first time having sex was with the person i was going to spend my life with and im happy i did. plus we talked about what would happen if i ever got preggers and made sure we had a plan on what to do just in case
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:09 pm
Here is my stance on Sex, and a bit of background.
I was severly sexually abused growing up. I was also raised (and still am) Mormon. So from A relidious point of view, sex outside of marriage is forbidden. From an emotional stand point I was scared to death of sex. All I knew of it was that it was a way to demean and control someone. When my mother found out what was going on she did the best thing in the world, she called the police and got a divorce (and yes he went to jail) its a hard thing in the Mormon religion to get a divorce, because we see marriage as for time and all eternity, but,since what he did was so wrong the Church is all for severing that eternal bond. However there were people who looked down on my mother and the rest of my family for what we went through.
I spent a long time not wanting to ever have sex, I encountered other people who treated sex like it was a power tool, and it just re-affirmed to me that sex is bad. I joined the navy, and there sex was rampant, girls were all over getting pregnant, and it seemed wasteful and life harming. I was glad that both my religious views and personal experience made me unwilling to engage in it.
At the same time I was really lonely and I wanted to have that physical closeness, but was way to afraid to let anyone in. I had an accident, and got out of the Navy. a few years later my friend introduced me to the man I married.
Now I am a happily married woman. My wonderful husband was very understanding about my fears and my worries when it came to sex. He has always backed off when I have been uncomfortable, and he has encouraged me to explore and made the whole thing so much better. I find that I actually quite enjoy it. I do have some health issues So I cannot always engage in sex when I might want to, but again he is very understanding. We have a wonderful 2 year old daughter that I wouldn't trade for anything.
I know that many religious people think sex is dirty. That there is Original sin (which is not something Mormons believe in, Adam and Eve paid for that sin when they got kicked out of Eden, we do not have to keep paying for it.) My understanding and belief is that God wants us to enjoy Sex. it is for procreation yes, but it is also to strengthen the bond between man and wife. it is something sacred and holy when done right. Like all good and wonderful things it can be corrupted and used for wrong purposes.
Relationships require work. Nothing worth having is easy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:53 am
I am so sorry to hear about the troubles you had in your youth but I'm glad to hear that you are doing well now. I don't think sex is a bad thing personally. I think it's quite wonderful but I know it's something that must be used responsibly. I agree with you that a relationship requires work but it's worth having.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|