|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jazzy Synchron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:42 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE i see no problems with envoy of the beginning just like all of the other cards. i still am not seeing any problems with these "for some reason banned" cards keep trying to help me to see why they are indeed banned. I know, dude. Envoy of the Beginning is totally fair, so is Dark Hole. It's Delta Attacker that needs to be banned, hard.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:46 pm
Jazzy Synchron SOLIDNSNAKE i see no problems with envoy of the beginning just like all of the other cards. i still am not seeing any problems with these "for some reason banned" cards keep trying to help me to see why they are indeed banned. I know, dude. Envoy of the Beginning is totally fair, so is Dark Hole. It's Delta Attacker that needs to be banned, hard. loved the typed sarcasm but i find dark hole to be fair as well its like heavy storm just for monsters. people say dark hole is banned because its like raigeki if used at the right time. although i thought cards are ment to be used at the right time, technically using heavy storm at the "right time" is like it being a harpies feather duster so should heavy storm be banned! i think not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Four Sicilian Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:50 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE Grumpy Giygas SOLIDNSNAKE there exists bad luck and good luck. and the first definition ont he page you gave me says, " the force that seems to operate for good or ill in a person's life, as in shaping circumstances, events, or opportunities" sorry i think your deffinition is a bit off. correct me if im wrong for a first turn kill you actually need to draw those cards. sometimes people will get lucky and draw them (or unluckily for the people there facing) can you honestly name a full deck (40 to 60 cards) and say that NO MATTER what hand they draw it will be a first turn kill. i highly doubt it. i play traditional i have no problem playing with things limited to 1 but to go out of there way to ban cards just cause they are "unfair " or something is BS. i cant think of an unfair card. i can think of cards that i see and yea im angery they pulled them off but i wont be like "OMG GUYS CARD MUST BE BANNED CAUSE ITS UNFAIR" ive gotten caught in the yata lock so many times but ive found ways around it. if you do say the cards are unfair thats why they are banned then tell me why are certain cards not banned like beast king barbaros star dust dragon assualt mode needle worm (at least limited) grand mole. (cheap as hell) ETC i have complaints but when they are used on me i dont get angry i may be annoyed but i dont get to tpoint where i think a card should be banned EVER The luck s**t had nothing to do with you. If you've gotten into a Yata LOCK you wouldn't get out of it. Why? BECAUSE IT'S A LOCK. Getting pecked once or twice with resources still available to you isn't a lock. Want to bet I can't? Monsters 7: 1 Cyber Jar 3 Broww 3 Thunder Dragon Spells 33: 1 Graceful Charity 1 Card Destruction 1 Serial Spell 3 Book of Taiyou 3 The Shallow Grave 1 Painful Choice 1 Pot of Greed 3 Dark World Dealings 3 Hand Destruction 3 Magical Mallet 1 Foolish Burial 3 Upstart Goblin 3 Into the Void 1 Harpies' Feather Duster 1 Heavy Storm 1 Giant Trunade 2 Book of Eclipse 1 Monster Reborn 1 Premature Burial One of many "I go first, I win the match" decks. Want to try again? beast king barbaros - No need, whatsoever. Three tributes for a possible two monster kill? Congrats, you just -1'd yourself. star dust dragon assualt mode - Too hard to get out and I've beaten this thing a few times. needle worm (at least limited) - No need. Milling is not a problem in Advanced because EMPTY JAR IS GONE. grand mole. (cheap as hell) - Limited like it should be, not game breaking enough to make it ban worthy. Try again. yea but i find ways out of it now certain cards that would be great against it and umm looking at your deck list 1 Monster Reborn 1 Premature Burial 2 book of eclipse 1 giant trunade 1 heavy storm first hand with draw. im not seeing a one turn win. try again i said make a deck where no matter what you draw is a one turn kill.. so yea try again and barboros : 3 tributes field nuked on your opponents and you can attack directly with that and whatever else you have... seems pretty cheap to me star dust dragon assualt mode: offer and you can stop and destory anything at the price of virtually nothing....kinda cheap to me needle worm: i use it but i still think 5 cards is over kill especially when i have used 5 in one duel (go pot of avarice) grand mole: o right so basically fing over every monster that comes out isnt game breaking at all. i have a monster in face down defence you have a very powerful monster you summoned last turn and destroyed one of my monsters. grand mole attacks its sent back to your hand. sorry its a cheap a** card in many situations. if i was a stiff about the ban list ide want it banned but as i said i dont care. im jsut bringing up examples of cards that i dont see why they are on there Ok, congratulations, you found a hand that will almost never happen. In fact I have a 1 in 3,838,380 chance of that happening. Your little technicalities do not defend your point that FTKs wouldn't rule the game is all those cards were unbanned. I will win every match if I go first with that deck. Want to try it? Barbaros: You're still only going to destroy two cards, at most, by the time you have three monsters to bring out. It's still a -1 and you'd have far better control by keeping those three monsters. Assault Mode: Just because its effect is good doesn't negate the fact that it's hard as ******** to get out and a DD Crow handles the situation. You -2 or 3 yourself to get it out and I -1 myself to stop it. You're still down, I still win. Needle Worm: Your opponents are bad, and so are you for even considering this thing broken. Grand Mole: Yes, it has locking capabilities, that's why it's at one. However, there are wonderful amounts of ways AROUND that lock. Summon Fulhelmknight in attack mode. They either summon it and Mole's attack is negated and he's stuck on the field, or they attack with the other monster first and make you negate, then bounce Fulhelm so you have an invincible wall. OR you could Book of Moon, Dimensional Prison, Torrential Tribute, Solemn Judgment, Solemn Warning, or Mirror Force it. All commonly used cards.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:52 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE Jazzy Synchron SOLIDNSNAKE i see no problems with envoy of the beginning just like all of the other cards. i still am not seeing any problems with these "for some reason banned" cards keep trying to help me to see why they are indeed banned. I know, dude. Envoy of the Beginning is totally fair, so is Dark Hole. It's Delta Attacker that needs to be banned, hard. loved the typed sarcasm but i find dark hole to be fair as well its like heavy storm just for monsters. people say dark hole is banned because its like raigeki if used at the right time. although i thought cards are ment to be used at the right time, technically using heavy storm at the "right time" is like it being a harpies feather duster so should heavy storm be banned! i think not. Dark Hole is, potentially and technically, worse than Raigeki at this point in time. Why? It's because I can think of a dozen monsters of your own that you would want to kill off, in order to perform the ridiculous. Dark Hole isn't banned in comparison to Raigeki. It's not limited due to its comparison to Heavy Storm. It's banned because of its own ability to generate one-sided advantage, every time it's played. You would like to say how we have cards to negate it. We have cards that can negate anything, but it doesn't solve the issue. Against idiots like you who shout "MAGIC JAMMER FTW!!1!", it's easy to negate your s**t, or better, force it out before we drop the Hole. Don't go preaching against what-should-be when it comes to the list, especially against Joe, who is one of the very few members left that have seen all and played all. Your sitting in your friend's basement playing what would be mockery and garbage doesn't really amount to that. Tl;dr - shut the ******** up, f*****t.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
Jazzy Synchron Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:58 pm
Grumpy Giygas SOLIDNSNAKE Grumpy Giygas SOLIDNSNAKE there exists bad luck and good luck. and the first definition ont he page you gave me says, " the force that seems to operate for good or ill in a person's life, as in shaping circumstances, events, or opportunities" sorry i think your deffinition is a bit off. correct me if im wrong for a first turn kill you actually need to draw those cards. sometimes people will get lucky and draw them (or unluckily for the people there facing) can you honestly name a full deck (40 to 60 cards) and say that NO MATTER what hand they draw it will be a first turn kill. i highly doubt it. i play traditional i have no problem playing with things limited to 1 but to go out of there way to ban cards just cause they are "unfair " or something is BS. i cant think of an unfair card. i can think of cards that i see and yea im angery they pulled them off but i wont be like "OMG GUYS CARD MUST BE BANNED CAUSE ITS UNFAIR" ive gotten caught in the yata lock so many times but ive found ways around it. if you do say the cards are unfair thats why they are banned then tell me why are certain cards not banned like beast king barbaros star dust dragon assualt mode needle worm (at least limited) grand mole. (cheap as hell) ETC i have complaints but when they are used on me i dont get angry i may be annoyed but i dont get to tpoint where i think a card should be banned EVER The luck s**t had nothing to do with you. If you've gotten into a Yata LOCK you wouldn't get out of it. Why? BECAUSE IT'S A LOCK. Getting pecked once or twice with resources still available to you isn't a lock. Want to bet I can't? Monsters 7: 1 Cyber Jar 3 Broww 3 Thunder Dragon Spells 33: 1 Graceful Charity 1 Card Destruction 1 Serial Spell 3 Book of Taiyou 3 The Shallow Grave 1 Painful Choice 1 Pot of Greed 3 Dark World Dealings 3 Hand Destruction 3 Magical Mallet 1 Foolish Burial 3 Upstart Goblin 3 Into the Void 1 Harpies' Feather Duster 1 Heavy Storm 1 Giant Trunade 2 Book of Eclipse 1 Monster Reborn 1 Premature Burial One of many "I go first, I win the match" decks. Want to try again? beast king barbaros - No need, whatsoever. Three tributes for a possible two monster kill? Congrats, you just -1'd yourself. star dust dragon assualt mode - Too hard to get out and I've beaten this thing a few times. needle worm (at least limited) - No need. Milling is not a problem in Advanced because EMPTY JAR IS GONE. grand mole. (cheap as hell) - Limited like it should be, not game breaking enough to make it ban worthy. Try again. yea but i find ways out of it now certain cards that would be great against it and umm looking at your deck list 1 Monster Reborn 1 Premature Burial 2 book of eclipse 1 giant trunade 1 heavy storm first hand with draw. im not seeing a one turn win. try again i said make a deck where no matter what you draw is a one turn kill.. so yea try again and barboros : 3 tributes field nuked on your opponents and you can attack directly with that and whatever else you have... seems pretty cheap to me star dust dragon assualt mode: offer and you can stop and destory anything at the price of virtually nothing....kinda cheap to me needle worm: i use it but i still think 5 cards is over kill especially when i have used 5 in one duel (go pot of avarice) grand mole: o right so basically fing over every monster that comes out isnt game breaking at all. i have a monster in face down defence you have a very powerful monster you summoned last turn and destroyed one of my monsters. grand mole attacks its sent back to your hand. sorry its a cheap a** card in many situations. if i was a stiff about the ban list ide want it banned but as i said i dont care. im jsut bringing up examples of cards that i dont see why they are on there Ok, congratulations, you found a hand that will almost never happen. In fact I have a 1 in 3,838,380 chance of that happening. Your little technicalities do not defend your point that FTKs wouldn't rule the game is all those cards were unbanned. I will win every match if I go first with that deck. Want to try it? Barbaros: You're still only going to destroy two cards, at most, by the time you have three monsters to bring out. It's still a -1 and you'd have far better control by keeping those three monsters. Assault Mode: Just because its effect is good doesn't negate the fact that it's hard as ******** to get out and a DD Crow handles the situation. You -2 or 3 yourself to get it out and I -1 myself to stop it. You're still down, I still win. Needle Worm: Your opponents are bad, and so are you for even considering this thing broken. Grand Mole: Yes, it has locking capabilities, that's why it's at one. However, there are wonderful amounts of ways AROUND that lock. Summon Fulhelmknight in attack mode. They either summon it and Mole's attack is negated and he's stuck on the field, or they attack with the other monster first and make you negate, then bounce Fulhelm so you have an invincible wall. OR you could Book of Moon, Dimensional Prison, Torrential Tribute, Solemn Judgment, Solemn Warning, or Mirror Force it. All commonly used cards. But there is still a chance you can get the hand so yea i said make a deck that NOMATTER what you drew youde win. you did not. and it veries on what barbaros can destroy sometimes if its late those 1 or 2 cards it destroys will be just what you need. -1,2, or 3 cards to negate damn near any effect and destroy that card. ill deffidently take that needle worm is still f*cking rediculas. but see if you can name off all these cards why not think of a few cards that can stop a yata lock like chaos emporer dragon is CAPABLE of locking. so use divine wrath or bottomless trap hole or other things. i can play that game too.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:03 pm
Jazzy Synchron SOLIDNSNAKE Jazzy Synchron SOLIDNSNAKE i see no problems with envoy of the beginning just like all of the other cards. i still am not seeing any problems with these "for some reason banned" cards keep trying to help me to see why they are indeed banned. I know, dude. Envoy of the Beginning is totally fair, so is Dark Hole. It's Delta Attacker that needs to be banned, hard. loved the typed sarcasm but i find dark hole to be fair as well its like heavy storm just for monsters. people say dark hole is banned because its like raigeki if used at the right time. although i thought cards are ment to be used at the right time, technically using heavy storm at the "right time" is like it being a harpies feather duster so should heavy storm be banned! i think not. Dark Hole is, potentially and technically, worse than Raigeki at this point in time. Why? It's because I can think of a dozen monsters of your own that you would want to kill off, in order to perform the ridiculous. Dark Hole isn't banned in comparison to Raigeki. It's not limited due to its comparison to Heavy Storm. It's banned because of its own ability to generate one-sided advantage, every time it's played. You would like to say how we have cards to negate it. We have cards that can negate anything, but it doesn't solve the issue. Against idiots like you who shout "MAGIC JAMMER FTW!!1!", it's easy to negate your s**t, or better, force it out before we drop the Hole. Don't go preaching against what-should-be when it comes to the list, especially against Joe, who is one of the very few members left that have seen all and played all. Your sitting in your friend's basement playing what would be mockery and garbage doesn't really amount to that. Tl;dr - shut the ******** up, f*****t. i love how your getting angry over a card game. i really do. and all cards can be stopped i know that magic jammer can be stopped just a** easily. and i dont care if my "not that amazing dueling" doesnt compare to joes or whoever dueling. i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Four Sicilian Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:12 pm
Ok, build a deck to stop: Empty Jar FTK Last Turn FTK Frog FTK Other Mass Driver FTK Variations Magical Explosion FTK All three variations Magical Scientist FTK Chain Strike FTK DDT Exodia Now Dark Strike Fighter OTK Makyura FTK Both Variations
And still be able to beat... Traditional STUN Traditional Naturias Traditional Morphtronics Traditional Machina Gadgets Traditional Synchro Cat Traditional CO Burn Traditional Black Garden Control Traditional Gladiator Beasts Traditional X-Sabers Traditional TeleDAD Traditional Infernities
and then beat... Traditional RFG Monarchs Traditional Perfect Circle Traditional Frog Monarchs Traditional Quickdraw Traditional Drain Plants Traditional Chaos Traditional Lightsworn
Need any more?
Every deck becomes viable because 80% of that deck will be stapled banned cards. Why? Because they generate massive card advantage. There is no skill in traditional play.
You're wrong, utterly wrong about thinking those things should not be banned.
Also, I listed FOURTEEN OTK/FTK decks off the top of my head. I'd LOVE to see a deck to counter all of them while still being able to stand on its own against other decks that aren't OTK/FTK focused. Come on, try me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:15 pm
Grumpy Giygas Ok, build a deck to stop: Empty Jar FTK Last Turn FTK Frog FTK Other Mass Driver FTK Variations Magical Explosion FTK All three variations Magical Scientist FTK Chain Strike FTK DDT Exodia Now Dark Strike Fighter OTK Makyura FTK Both Variations And still be able to beat... Traditional STUN Traditional Naturias Traditional Morphtronics Traditional Machina Gadgets Traditional Synchro Cat Traditional CO Burn Traditional Black Garden Control Traditional Gladiator Beasts Traditional X-Sabers Traditional TeleDAD Traditional Infernities and then beat... Traditional RFG Monarchs Traditional Perfect Circle Traditional Frog Monarchs Traditional Quickdraw Traditional Drain Plants Traditional Chaos Traditional Lightsworn Need any more? Every deck becomes viable because 80% of that deck will be stapled banned cards. Why? Because they generate massive card advantage. There is no skill in traditional play. You're wrong, utterly wrong about thinking those things should not be banned. Also, I listed FOURTEEN OTK/FTK decks off the top of my head. I'd LOVE to see a deck to counter all of them while still being able to stand on its own against other decks that aren't OTK/FTK focused. Come on, try me. ya know you may have a point about there being a deck that cant stop all of them but theres always a chance they wont draw exactly what they need. and besides if your trying to convince me cards should be banned. your kinda failing at it more. i actually want this to happen so i can try and find ways around them. HEHEHEHE that be so amazing!!!!! I SEROUSLY HOPE THEY SAY F*CK THE BAN list ide love to see this
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jazzy Synchron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:20 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE i love how your getting angry over a card game. i really do. I love how you like to assume I've become angry, when really I'm just enjoying treating you and everything you've said as a joke. Point is, this entire time it's just a cry for some of the things you used to play in your deck back, because from your seat you've never once grasped the entirety of the game and its structure, and seen the ridiculous side of things. Note for future use, it's spelt "ridiculous". However, your opinion isn't factual from what is. Point is, prior to ban, all of the cards currently on the list have had one-sided advantage in their days being played at an increased number from what they currently are. It has happened every time, and so the list is there to moderate. Cyber Jar was one of the grand examples that people have abused for those first-turn kills, which along with locks such as Yata-Garasu, is the largest one-sided tactic in the game. Yet, you've taken the list provided by Grumpy, and literally hand-picked the six cards that wouldn't flow together to prove a case that goes against fact; 6 of 40, the odds are quite staggering against your case. You say the guarantee isn't there. Tournaments around the world say otherwise of its time. This thread, all-in-all, is concerning legitimate thoughts on the list - what would make the game better, not let you have your way like some whining brat. The moment you said "I don't understand", legitimacy was never there. SOLIDNSNAKE IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me Obviously because people like money. Your ignorance is a joke.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:24 pm
Jazzy Synchron SOLIDNSNAKE i love how your getting angry over a card game. i really do. I love how you like to assume I've become angry, when really I'm just enjoying treating you and everything you've said as a joke. Point is, this entire time it's just a cry for some of the things you used to play in your deck back, because from your seat you've never once grasped the entirety of the game and its structure, and seen the ridiculous side of things. Note for future use, it's spelt "ridiculous". However, your opinion isn't factual from what is. Point is, prior to ban, all of the cards currently on the list have had one-sided advantage in their days being played at an increased number from what they currently are. It has happened every time, and so the list is there to moderate. Cyber Jar was one of the grand examples that people have abused for those first-turn kills, which along with locks such as Yata-Garasu, is the largest one-sided tactic in the game. Yet, you've taken the list provided by Grumpy, and literally hand-picked the six cards that wouldn't flow together to prove a case that goes against fact; 6 of 40, the odds are quite staggering against your case. You say the guarantee isn't there. Tournaments around the world say otherwise of its time. This thread, all-in-all, is concerning legitimate thoughts on the list - what would make the game better, not let you have your way like some whining brat. The moment you said "I don't understand", legitimacy was never there. SOLIDNSNAKE IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me Obviously because people like money. Your ignorance is a joke. lol ignorance is bliss. and all i said was i didnt understand why. but you guys arent helping me to see why they are. and i did say make a deck that nomatter what you drew you would win. grumpy didnt. but either way my opinion is they shouldnt be banned. one great way around yata lock Sinister serpant. i dont see why that is banned either but thats beside the point
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:25 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me The tournament scene was made for the card game, not vice versa. Your reasoning fails to take this into account, as well as people who don't go by the Advanced Format banlists, such as Traditional Format players and folks who just play by home rules. Face it: Your logic is faulty.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:28 pm
Ritemaster Wilren SOLIDNSNAKE i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me The tournament scene was made for the card game, not vice versa. Your reasoning fails to take this into account, as well as people who don't go by the Advanced Format banlists, such as Traditional Format players and folks who just play by home rules. Face it: Your logic is faulty. well they keep coming out with cards. so to prevent this from happemning they could stop making such bad a** cards. but they dont. so my logic works in the end. maybe not for cards out not but for them in the future.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Four Sicilian Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:30 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE Ritemaster Wilren SOLIDNSNAKE i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me The tournament scene was made for the card game, not vice versa. Your reasoning fails to take this into account, as well as people who don't go by the Advanced Format banlists, such as Traditional Format players and folks who just play by home rules. Face it: Your logic is faulty. well they keep coming out with cards. so to prevent this from happemning they could stop making such bad a** cards. but they dont. so my logic works in the end. maybe not for cards out not but for them in the future. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR. Of course, the R&D department of Konami really care that much right? If they see an OTK/FTK possibility, they may nerf a card idea, or they could make it a secret rare so people buy more packs so they can run the OTK/FTK. Then they'll limit it later to keep players playing. Marketing Priorities > Game Development Priorities
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:32 pm
Grumpy Giygas SOLIDNSNAKE Ritemaster Wilren SOLIDNSNAKE i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me The tournament scene was made for the card game, not vice versa. Your reasoning fails to take this into account, as well as people who don't go by the Advanced Format banlists, such as Traditional Format players and folks who just play by home rules. Face it: Your logic is faulty. well they keep coming out with cards. so to prevent this from happemning they could stop making such bad a** cards. but they dont. so my logic works in the end. maybe not for cards out not but for them in the future. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR. Of course, the R&D department of Konami really care that much right? If they see an OTK/FTK possibility, they may nerf a card idea, or they could make it a secret rare so people buy more packs so they can run the OTK/FTK. Then they'll limit it later to keep players playing. Marketing Priorities > Game Development Priorities right make it a secret rare so everyone will buy this card pack to get the card that they wont be able to use cause it will be banned. doesnt mnake much sence to me. you say i need to think. sounds liek you need to think to me
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jazzy Synchron Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 6:35 pm
SOLIDNSNAKE Grumpy Giygas SOLIDNSNAKE Ritemaster Wilren SOLIDNSNAKE i enjoy dueling and i find it stupid there are bans. IF YOU WANT A CARD NOT TO BE PLAYED THEN DONT MAKE THE CARD. sounds like a solution to me The tournament scene was made for the card game, not vice versa. Your reasoning fails to take this into account, as well as people who don't go by the Advanced Format banlists, such as Traditional Format players and folks who just play by home rules. Face it: Your logic is faulty. well they keep coming out with cards. so to prevent this from happemning they could stop making such bad a** cards. but they dont. so my logic works in the end. maybe not for cards out not but for them in the future. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUR. Of course, the R&D department of Konami really care that much right? If they see an OTK/FTK possibility, they may nerf a card idea, or they could make it a secret rare so people buy more packs so they can run the OTK/FTK. Then they'll limit it later to keep players playing. Marketing Priorities > Game Development Priorities right make it a secret rare so everyone will buy this card pack to get the card that they wont be able to use cause it will be banned. doesnt mnake much sence to me. you say i need to think. sounds liek you need to think to me Because it's not banned at the time of its release, and people like to win, so the rarity is jacked sky high with the rate of pulls plummeting to Hell? How do you not understand this? Look at the tournament structure now; YCS offers, what, for top win? A set of cards that go for the thousands just because people are willing to pay that much, and last I checked, XBOX 360's and Apple merchandise was also obtainable. Shot at riches and a bit of glory outdoes the money they spend making the deck, and people will do so, despite how slim the chances are.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|