Welcome to Gaia! ::

Debate/Discuss Religion

Back to Guilds

A guild devoted to discussing and debating different aspects of various world religions 

Tags: religion, faith, tolerance, discuss, debate 

Reply Religious Debate
How deep is your spirituality? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Chieftain Twilight

Loyal Rogue

14,550 Points
  • Full closet 200
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Elocutionist 200
PostPosted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:21 pm


Lateralus es Helica
Basilia Ann E

I have access to documents (real historical archives) that self-taught guru's don't have access to. My views are based on the rare, and often hidden, documents.


I'm just curious what in the world those are. The argument here is that your classifying any spiritual or ritual expression as a religion, even going so far as to include being a fan of sports. I'm trying to figure out what documents might possibly say that religion, atheism, and agnosticism are anything other than what they actually are.

We'll start with religion since it's the biggest one.

Quote:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.

7.
religions, Archaic . religious rites.
8.
Archaic . strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
—Idiom
9.
get religion, Informal .
a.
to acquire a deep conviction of the validity of religious beliefs and practices.
b.
to resolve to mend one's errant ways: The company got religion and stopped making dangerous products.


Atheism
Quote:
1.
the doctrine or belief that there is no god.
2.
disbelief in the existence of a supreme being or beings.


Agnosticism
Quote:
1.
The doctrine that certainty about first principles or absolute truth is unattainable and that only perceptual phenomena are objects of exact knowledge.
2.
The belief that there can be no proof either that God exists or that God does not exist.


Notice as I pointed out before all agnosticism and atheism does is make claims regarding the existence of God/Gods. They don't have moral codes. They don't answer questions concerning creation of the universe. They don't have ritual observances. They aren't religion.

Now once again we come to all spiritual expression being religion. You'll have to remember to start with that my definition of spirituality in and of itself was conjecture but at the very least I defined my terms of it. Going off of that and not necessarily any formal definition spiritual expression or expression of the self doesn't necessarily have to be religious expression. Indeed, religion is all about conforming the self to a specific set of guidelines. So unless that expression happens to fit into the specific guidelines outlined by whatever religion you buy into, it's not necessarily religious.

Example: Me, agnostic, sitting on a rooftop watching streams of people traversing the streets and feeling a keen connection to them as a fellow human, a sense of 'we are all one'. I'm not doing it as a mode of religious expression, indeed I follow no religion. Remember, agnosticism is just stating that the existence of God is unknown and is in no way a religion. Even if you wanted to try that here, the connection I'm feeling has absolutely nothing to do with conjecture on whether or not God exists, it just has to do with my fellow man, it's outside of agnosticism.

Now, if I were Christian and I sat there and suddenly was hit by the glory of part of God's plan for all of us, that would be a religious expression of spirituality. The former and the instances I do actually express however are not considering I'm an irreligious individual.

Irreligious, for the record, is
Quote:
1.
not religious; not practicing a religion and feeling no religious impulses or emotions.
2.
showing or characterized by a lack of religion.
3.
showing indifference or hostility to religion: irreligious statements.


This much I can concede though: Ritual expressions are referred to as 'religious' such as religiously watching a television show, but 'religious' in this sense of the definition is a pun, a satirical comment pointing to the similarities the fanatical expression between ritual within a religion and the ritual that's being pointed out as 'religious'.

/rant That's really all I had a problem with, using 'religious' in the satirical sense and trying to impose it as actual definition. That, and you wouldn't be the first person that mistook what agnosticism actually is.

Hell rmcdra is technically an agnostic according to the first definition of agnosticism as he's stated over and over again God by nature cannot be proven through science or by empirical means. Believing in God is a matter of faith. In this case, if we go strictly by the first definition, he is an agnostic with theist leanings in contrast to me being agnostic with atheist leanings. He still has faith in God's existence even if he doesn't believe God's existence can be proven through any empirical means. I use that example just to show how broad the spectrum of ideas and beliefs concerning agnosticism really is.

Same goes for atheism, hell if you want an example of how much they differ just look at the ethical and moral codes that different atheists set for themselves. Some believe that they can do whatever the hell they want because there never will be consequences. Some believe that morality in and of itself is reason enough to act in a moral and ethical matter and they don't need any threat of eternal punishment to behave.


xd i honestly love you! i hav emet a person as much a Geek as myself! heart how awesome.
PostPosted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:27 am


i'd say it's damned deep

because i have made many important decision based upon my sense of spiritual values

and i have refined those values through long study in world religions.

but i also take long hot baths surrounded by cucmber melon candles! that's got to count for something! razz

chessiejo


Basilia Ann E

3,100 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Autobiographer 200
PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:42 pm



I'm back from vacation and have begun organizing my library. I will continue the discussion, including references to;

1. A Greek-Christian text from ~400 A.D. supporting evolution
2. A Greek text (~1100 AD) referring to the Pope as the anti-Christ
3. Texts denouncing the messages right wing, Fundamentalists - as heretics.
4. A strong split between two Christian churches, one of the East trying to be destroyed by the West.
5. Documents showing the Eastern church was not European and pre-dated the West.

As well, I'll be spending the year updating my antiquities library with Roman, Hellenic, and older texts.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:48 pm


chessiejo
i'd say it's damned deep

because i have made many important decision based upon my sense of spiritual values

and i have refined those values through long study in world religions.

but i also take long hot baths surrounded by cucmber melon candles! that's got to count for something! razz



My reading rooms have scented candles. Have you finished (as in refined) or open (as in refined, but can be adjusted as I continue to read).


Basilia Ann E

3,100 Points
  • Citizen 200
  • Person of Interest 200
  • Autobiographer 200

mazuac

4,500 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Statustician 100
  • Contributor 150
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 6:56 pm


Well, I'd say I am fairly "spiritual..." And by that, I mean... I read the Bible every day, pray, and even enjoy listening to Gregorian Chants to help calm and focus myself haha! XD

Does that count as being "spiritual?" O:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 19, 2010 9:17 pm


I've been told that it's not necessary to follow a god to be spiritual. I feel that this is true, or at least true for me, because I'm not religious in the slightest.

No, spirituality can be related to religion, but it's different. I believe it's about a place in the world, the reason for continuing to exist rather than self-terminating once a person has become self-aware.
For some people, their occupation brings them joy. They feel needed, valued, and connected to the world.
Maybe, for others, it's the perception that someone loves them and wants them by their side--a spouse or a child, for example--who is the source of that joy. (insert God into this slot as a fail-safe loving being?)
Communities of religious believers can provide the joy of belonging. But fulfillment, and therefore security, can only come from your own personal convictions.

Consequently, knowing our places in the grand scheme (or roiling tides of chaos) will lead to an awareness of the human race. Whether we respond to that with compassion or horror is a matter we have to sort out ourselves.

All that said, I regard myself as a spiritual person. I do have strong morals (WHAT! AN ATHEIST WITH MORALS?!) and for now, my community of friends is my anchor to this temporal plane.

Eccentric Detective


Lateralus es Helica

6,450 Points
  • Prayer Circle 200
  • First step to fame 200
  • Invisibility 100
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:01 am


Not knowing if you're going to live or die tends to make you a bit more spiritual. It also tends to be a bit frightening the vast void of death from an agnostic point of view.


Sorry I just got out of the hospital, had two surgeries done on my face and almost died from an infection in my jaw.

Maybe there should be a brand new topic for that one...near death encounters or something.
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:36 pm


you can take away my scented candles

and long hot baths

with cucumber and melon soap

and i will cry!

but i will still be spiritual

because my spirit is anchored to the center of all, the Ground of Being (Tillich) which as i understand it the Hindus call Brahman.

and the depths are unshakable.

chessiejo


rmcdra

Loved Seeker

11,700 Points
  • Forum Sophomore 300
  • Partygoer 500
  • Contributor 150
PostPosted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:47 pm


Lateralus es Helica


Hell rmcdra is technically an agnostic according to the first definition of agnosticism as he's stated over and over again God by nature cannot be proven through science or by empirical means. Believing in God is a matter of faith. In this case, if we go strictly by the first definition, he is an agnostic with theist leanings in contrast to me being agnostic with atheist leanings. He still has faith in God's existence even if he doesn't believe God's existence can be proven through any empirical means. I use that example just to show how broad the spectrum of ideas and beliefs concerning agnosticism really is.
... I was about to b***h you out there until I read that last part here. lol.

But yes I agree with you in that scope is a big part of it. If empiricism is the only method we are considering to be proof then yes I would be agnostic. Since I do consider experiential methods as proof, then no I am not an agnostic because I have accept what experiential evidence that has been presented to me as proof that at least my God exists. As for other gods I don't know because for the most part I get the feeling they want nothing to do with me.
So if only empiricism i would be a 3.
If we consider empiricism and experiential means then I am a 1.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 8:45 pm


Basilia Ann E
chessiejo
i'd say it's damned deep

because i have made many important decision based upon my sense of spiritual values

and i have refined those values through long study in world religions.

but i also take long hot baths surrounded by cucmber melon candles! that's got to count for something! razz



My reading rooms have scented candles. Have you finished (as in refined) or open (as in refined, but can be adjusted as I continue to read).



do you mean about the candles?

i would say both, maybe?

i have some little ones that are made locally- refined?- and they are on squared stones all over the place

and then i have some that are more like wicks in oil, and these are suspended in globes on wires- open?

chessiejo


GINNFACE

PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:26 am


I know plenty of men who have a stronger foundation of spiritualiy than women. That's definitely a hasty generalization.
PostPosted: Wed Jan 05, 2011 4:45 pm


Being a very potent Atheist who has little patience for things like gods, morale values, or, um, "scented candles" (WHAT xd ), I'm sure calling myself spiritual could confuse a lot of people, but I do know I'm capable of the feeling. It's usually brought on by at least an hour of reading up on philosophy. Since I've always thought that things like the concept of time and the continued gathering of intelligence are allusions, I can almost feel myself detaching from everything man made around me and returning to the state where nothing matters except continuing survival and contentness.

I probably sound like I'm on drugs, but I couldn't hope to explain that feeling anyway.

Dimentia44


AskingCaraphernelia

3,250 Points
  • Signature Look 250
  • Consumer 100
  • Hygienic 200
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:45 pm


i would say i am a spiritual person although sometimes i screw up, i always have my religion to come back to.
PostPosted: Sat Aug 20, 2011 3:57 pm


My spirituality is very strong... Though it may not be obvious in real life, I am constantly praying to all my gods and goddesses. I am NeoPagan Satanist in a strictly Christian family. I do not do this to rebel, rather, this is truly what I believe. Why is it considered such a crime to have different beliefs?

x-MistressMurder-x

5,350 Points
  • Tycoon 200
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Citizen 200

Aporeia

Shameless Mystic

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:07 pm


Ceremonialism =/= spiritualism. And if you want to play the sexist game, do keep in mind that the vast majority of philosophers, spiritual leaders, and theologians in the world are and have always been male.

The trends are that males tend to be more structured and religious, while women tend towards inner compassing and experientialism. One could say that religion is wordly, but the same could be said of experience seekers.

The sexes merely tend to fixate on different ideas, and even then it's only a trend.
Reply
Religious Debate

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum