|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:06 am
Someoneiknow Shmearwhiz Semiremis Sanguina Cruenta I think you should help people for the sake of helping them, not as a vehicle to spread your religious beliefs neutral Why assume that they help people only to spread their beliefs? Because it just so happens that people go around the world to spread Christianity. Their priorities are pretty much: if we spread out beliefs it'll save these good people, therefore we are helping them. After hurricane katrina many LDS people and missionaries went down to help the victims rebuild and restore their community, and non of it was in an excuse to proselyte. sad People oftentimes forget or just don't realize how much religious institutions do for the world in the way of humanitarian work.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:42 pm
Is'nt this a matter of free speech ?
How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ?
As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:37 pm
dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:42 pm
Actually its not a matter of Freedom of Speech because ITS NOT AMERICA. America has Freedom of Speech while China doesn't its just the law. I won't call the man/woman a Martyr because they go knowing they'll probably die or be forcefully kicked out of the country. Don't go to a country that has banned what you go there to do and expect a warm welcome. If you wanna convert people to your religion go to a place where they won't mind you preaching about your religion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:28 pm
Someoneiknow I was curious on this guilds perspective of individuals going into countries were proselytizing is illegal. I feel that this sort of missionary work is misleading and doesn't promote the message of God very well. People may feel that the Christian (I do not know about other religions do this) is just out there to do whatever it wants, rather than waiting for God to open the way. What's your thoughts? I remember Christ saying he did'nt come to break the law but to forfill it. And there was instruction to go throughout the world to preach the gospel. The law (the police) have been known to speed in order to catch the one speeding, even though he is breaking the law, he is fufilling it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:28 pm
dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Yeah it certainly is a freedom of speech issue but is the missionary going there to fight that injustice (and possibly others along side of it) or is (s)he breaking the rules just to spread their beliefs because they think they are doing right by God?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:22 am
Someoneiknow dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own. Okay, I think I can approach this on two levels, firstly my ethicial/political inclinations as a secular atheist and secondly in how Jesus suggested that you yourselves as Christians should behave. Before that though, could you tell me why either of us should follow their rules ? I personally believe that bad laws are there to be broken, ignored and otherwise disobeyed. Youre looking at this as a given law barring you from action, but what if a a law was specifically demanding an unchristian, even a sinful course of action ? I'd ask you to withdraw any assetion that we should follow the law simply because its the law. I believe that my rights as a human beings are not granted by any particular govenrment. As I said earlier rights are inhrent to each and every human being, no matter their relgious beliefs or where they travel. If we accept that rights are granted by a government then we also have it accept that they can be taken away, at which points they are of course no longer rights, because rights by there own definition are inalienable. Anything else is a priveledge to be taken away, whenever a particualar government ses fit. Now for you as a Christian Jesus does indeed teach a certain level of co-operation with mans laws, in taxes to Caeser. Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. And indeed it would behoove you to do so, but lets first ask the question; are the immortal souls of men Caesers due ? As for god opening up an area, yes of ocurse he will, but not in the obvious way you might expect. Wasnt Paul himself imprisoned for his beliefs ? Weren't the other early Christians murdered and persecuted for preaching their beliefs ? I dont think any man has become a martyr, through not proclaiming the Gospel and adhering to the laws of men.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:25 am
Zslone2 Actually its not a matter of Freedom of Speech because ITS NOT AMERICA. America has Freedom of Speech while China doesn't its just the law. I won't call the man/woman a Martyr because they go knowing they'll probably die or be forcefully kicked out of the country. Don't go to a country that has banned what you go there to do and expect a warm welcome. If you wanna convert people to your religion go to a place where they won't mind you preaching about your religion. I dont think anyone would be expecting a warm welcome. I will ask you though, are the souls of the Chinese peoiple less worthy of salvation than their American counterparts ?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:30 am
Semiremis dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Yeah it certainly is a freedom of speech issue but is the missionary going there to fight that injustice (and possibly others along side of it) or is (s)he breaking the rules just to spread their beliefs because they think they are doing right by God? Id expect that (s)he's there to proselytise for their relgion rather than make any political statement on individual liberty. But would it be awfully trite of me to quote Evelyn Hall on the topic ? 3nodding
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:59 am
dio777 Someoneiknow dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own. Okay, I think I can approach this on two levels, firstly my ethicial/political inclinations as a secular atheist and secondly in how Jesus suggested that you yourselves as Christians should behave. Before that though, could you tell me why either of us should follow their rules ? I personally believe that bad laws are there to be broken, ignored and otherwise disobeyed. Youre looking at this as a given law barring you from action, but what if a a law was specifically demanding an unchristian, even a sinful course of action ? I'd ask you to withdraw any assetion that we should follow the law simply because its the law. I believe that my rights as a human beings are not granted by any particular govenrment. As I said earlier rights are inhrent to each and every human being, no matter their relgious beliefs or where they travel. If we accept that rights are granted by a government then we also have it accept that they can be taken away, at which points they are of course no longer rights, because rights by there own definition are inalienable. Anything else is a priveledge to be taken away, whenever a particualar government ses fit. Now for you as a Christian Jesus does indeed teach a certain level of co-operation with mans laws, in taxes to Caeser. Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. And indeed it would behoove you to do so, but lets first ask the question; are the immortal souls of men Caesers due ? As for god opening up an area, yes of ocurse he will, but not in the obvious way you might expect. Wasnt Paul himself imprisoned for his beliefs ? Weren't the other early Christians murdered and persecuted for preaching their beliefs ? I dont think any man has become a martyr, through not proclaiming the Gospel and adhering to the laws of men. When people come here from other countries should the follow our laws or not? As immigrants and or tourists they are to follow the laws. That is expected of them as guests. It is rude and dishonorable for someone not to follow these rules and or laws. It's called etiquette. neutral Learn it. That said the laws in other countries aren't "bad". They shouldn't be broken either. Their laws have very strict punishment backed behind them if they are "bad". Many countries allow whipping using a bamboo stick. If you wish to stay in that country and not end up in jail, beaten or worse, then it's best to follow the rules. Remember, you are a guest in a foreign country. If you misbehave not only are you dishonoring your country, but also whatever deity you worship, and your ancestors, and the people of your home country. In democratic countries we take things like religious freedom for granted and try to impose our religion on other's because we feel it's right. When in reality, it is wrong, immoral, and in most cases....taboo. History has shown us that "witnessing", preaching, etc can change the ideas and the morals of people and cause them to rebel against their governments. Which is why countries like Iraq, China and Russia have strict laws against religious missions. It's to keep people from rebelling and to keep dissenters out. Historical examples can include but aren't limited to the Boxer Rebellion, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, rebellions of India. Also need I remind you that there are such missions that have ended in bloodshed and turmoil. Need I remind you how the Manifest Destiny in America became a failure? Going to help out another country is one thing, but if they have strict laws and even stricter punishment for proselyting, then either leave your pious beliefs at home, or don't go to that country. Just don't preach to them. I don't think preaching about Jesus and trying to convert others is worth getting beaten with a bamboo stick or having them pull of your fingernails with a weird machine or even with a bamboo stick. Do you? Yes, Early Christians were persecuted and murdered and what not. But Early Christians did the same things to the pagans, muslims, Native Americans, so forth and so on. But the question is why? The answer to this is simple, because in the areas the Christians lived in where the majority were pagan, it was because the Roman Pagans feared the Christians. They saw them as a threat. The same can be said about the Christians in Mideval Europe during the Inquisitions, Witch Trials and even the Crusades. In short be respectful to the host countries, follow their rules and that even means don't preach to others. Help out with the countries needs but for your own safety, remember that every life is precious even your own. Throwing that away will make your beliefs worthless. Throwing your life away because of a belief in a savior will become worthless. However helping those in need is more important than a belief, helping others shows that you are a good person, versus saying you're a good person.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:49 am
dio777 Semiremis dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Yeah it certainly is a freedom of speech issue but is the missionary going there to fight that injustice (and possibly others along side of it) or is (s)he breaking the rules just to spread their beliefs because they think they are doing right by God? Id expect that (s)he's there to proselytise for their relgion rather than make any political statement on individual liberty. But would it be awfully trite of me to quote Evelyn Hall on the topic ? 3nodding Yes it would and I don't see the relevancy of it either if used in this case (assuming that we're talking about the same statement). cool
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:39 am
-Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden dio777 Someoneiknow dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own. Okay, I think I can approach this on two levels, firstly my ethicial/political inclinations as a secular atheist and secondly in how Jesus suggested that you yourselves as Christians should behave. Before that though, could you tell me why either of us should follow their rules ? I personally believe that bad laws are there to be broken, ignored and otherwise disobeyed. Youre looking at this as a given law barring you from action, but what if a a law was specifically demanding an unchristian, even a sinful course of action ? I'd ask you to withdraw any assetion that we should follow the law simply because its the law. I believe that my rights as a human beings are not granted by any particular govenrment. As I said earlier rights are inhrent to each and every human being, no matter their relgious beliefs or where they travel. If we accept that rights are granted by a government then we also have it accept that they can be taken away, at which points they are of course no longer rights, because rights by there own definition are inalienable. Anything else is a priveledge to be taken away, whenever a particualar government ses fit. Now for you as a Christian Jesus does indeed teach a certain level of co-operation with mans laws, in taxes to Caeser. Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. And indeed it would behoove you to do so, but lets first ask the question; are the immortal souls of men Caesers due ? As for god opening up an area, yes of ocurse he will, but not in the obvious way you might expect. Wasnt Paul himself imprisoned for his beliefs ? Weren't the other early Christians murdered and persecuted for preaching their beliefs ? I dont think any man has become a martyr, through not proclaiming the Gospel and adhering to the laws of men. When people come here from other countries should the follow our laws or not? As immigrants and or tourists they are to follow the laws. That is expected of them as guests. It is rude and dishonorable for someone not to follow these rules and or laws. It's called etiquette. neutral Learn it. That said the laws in other countries aren't "bad". They shouldn't be broken either. Their laws have very strict punishment backed behind them if they are "bad". Many countries allow whipping using a bamboo stick. If you wish to stay in that country and not end up in jail, beaten or worse, then it's best to follow the rules. Remember, you are a guest in a foreign country. If you misbehave not only are you dishonoring your country, but also whatever deity you worship, and your ancestors, and the people of your home country. In democratic countries we take things like religious freedom for granted and try to impose our religion on other's because we feel it's right. When in reality, it is wrong, immoral, and in most cases....taboo. History has shown us that "witnessing", preaching, etc can change the ideas and the morals of people and cause them to rebel against their governments. Which is why countries like Iraq, China and Russia have strict laws against religious missions. It's to keep people from rebelling and to keep dissenters out. Historical examples can include but aren't limited to the Boxer Rebellion, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, rebellions of India. Also need I remind you that there are such missions that have ended in bloodshed and turmoil. Need I remind you how the Manifest Destiny in America became a failure? Going to help out another country is one thing, but if they have strict laws and even stricter punishment for proselyting, then either leave your pious beliefs at home, or don't go to that country. Just don't preach to them. I don't think preaching about Jesus and trying to convert others is worth getting beaten with a bamboo stick or having them pull of your fingernails with a weird machine or even with a bamboo stick. Do you? Yes, Early Christians were persecuted and murdered and what not. But Early Christians did the same things to the pagans, muslims, Native Americans, so forth and so on. But the question is why? The answer to this is simple, because in the areas the Christians lived in where the majority were pagan, it was because the Roman Pagans feared the Christians. They saw them as a threat. The same can be said about the Christians in Mideval Europe during the Inquisitions, Witch Trials and even the Crusades. In short be respectful to the host countries, follow their rules and that even means don't preach to others. Help out with the countries needs but for your own safety, remember that every life is precious even your own. Throwing that away will make your beliefs worthless. Throwing your life away because of a belief in a savior will become worthless. However helping those in need is more important than a belief, helping others shows that you are a good person, versus saying you're a good person. A more passionate argument against freedom of speech I have never seen. Who among you could balance a human beings right to air his political/religious views without fear of violence or incarceration, against some percieved duty to be courteuos and find free speech wanting ? With regards to foreigners following the law in my own country I can think of several occasions where i would in fact appolaud them for breaking our own laws. For example, when the Westboro Baptist Church wanted to send a party to protest at the funeral of a gay man held here in Britain, I condemned in equal measure the wickedness of the WBC for proposing such a thing and the totalitarian behaviour of the British government in forbidding it. It was not only the WBC's right to picket the funeral that was infringed but also my right to wait at the airport for them and throw every last ounce of venom and abuse I could at such disgusting bigots. And who said anything about imposing beliefs on anybody ? Were talking about the right to air your beliefs and try to convince others in liberal debate, no one least of all me suggested anybody had the right to force people to believe anything. I also dont understand why your supporting Chinas right to suppress freedom of speech on account of it being a great method of suppresing rebeliion confused Lastly youre incorrect to say that no laws are wrong. Morality is subjective, whilst a group of Wahabi Muslims in Saudi Arabia would preach Sharia law and the righteousness of hanging homosexuals and stoning to death adulterors, I myself and I suspect you would see this as being very wrong indeed. You also haven't addressed my argument that its perfectly accetable to ignore temporal laws, in pursuit of spreading the gospel.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:49 am
Semiremis dio777 Semiremis dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Yeah it certainly is a freedom of speech issue but is the missionary going there to fight that injustice (and possibly others along side of it) or is (s)he breaking the rules just to spread their beliefs because they think they are doing right by God? Id expect that (s)he's there to proselytise for their relgion rather than make any political statement on individual liberty. But would it be awfully trite of me to quote Evelyn Hall on the topic ? 3nodding Yes it would and I don't see the relevancy of it either if used in this case (assuming that we're talking about the same statement). cool Youre probably right. I guess what im trying to say is, I dont care what their peddling so long as its challanging authoritarian laws and thus possibly furthering the cause of free speech in a distant land.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:55 am
dio777 -Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden dio777 Someoneiknow dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own. Okay, I think I can approach this on two levels, firstly my ethicial/political inclinations as a secular atheist and secondly in how Jesus suggested that you yourselves as Christians should behave. Before that though, could you tell me why either of us should follow their rules ? I personally believe that bad laws are there to be broken, ignored and otherwise disobeyed. Youre looking at this as a given law barring you from action, but what if a a law was specifically demanding an unchristian, even a sinful course of action ? I'd ask you to withdraw any assetion that we should follow the law simply because its the law. I believe that my rights as a human beings are not granted by any particular govenrment. As I said earlier rights are inhrent to each and every human being, no matter their relgious beliefs or where they travel. If we accept that rights are granted by a government then we also have it accept that they can be taken away, at which points they are of course no longer rights, because rights by there own definition are inalienable. Anything else is a priveledge to be taken away, whenever a particualar government ses fit. Now for you as a Christian Jesus does indeed teach a certain level of co-operation with mans laws, in taxes to Caeser. Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. And indeed it would behoove you to do so, but lets first ask the question; are the immortal souls of men Caesers due ? As for god opening up an area, yes of ocurse he will, but not in the obvious way you might expect. Wasnt Paul himself imprisoned for his beliefs ? Weren't the other early Christians murdered and persecuted for preaching their beliefs ? I dont think any man has become a martyr, through not proclaiming the Gospel and adhering to the laws of men. When people come here from other countries should the follow our laws or not? As immigrants and or tourists they are to follow the laws. That is expected of them as guests. It is rude and dishonorable for someone not to follow these rules and or laws. It's called etiquette. neutral Learn it. That said the laws in other countries aren't "bad". They shouldn't be broken either. Their laws have very strict punishment backed behind them if they are "bad". Many countries allow whipping using a bamboo stick. If you wish to stay in that country and not end up in jail, beaten or worse, then it's best to follow the rules. Remember, you are a guest in a foreign country. If you misbehave not only are you dishonoring your country, but also whatever deity you worship, and your ancestors, and the people of your home country. In democratic countries we take things like religious freedom for granted and try to impose our religion on other's because we feel it's right. When in reality, it is wrong, immoral, and in most cases....taboo. History has shown us that "witnessing", preaching, etc can change the ideas and the morals of people and cause them to rebel against their governments. Which is why countries like Iraq, China and Russia have strict laws against religious missions. It's to keep people from rebelling and to keep dissenters out. Historical examples can include but aren't limited to the Boxer Rebellion, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, rebellions of India. Also need I remind you that there are such missions that have ended in bloodshed and turmoil. Need I remind you how the Manifest Destiny in America became a failure? Going to help out another country is one thing, but if they have strict laws and even stricter punishment for proselyting, then either leave your pious beliefs at home, or don't go to that country. Just don't preach to them. I don't think preaching about Jesus and trying to convert others is worth getting beaten with a bamboo stick or having them pull of your fingernails with a weird machine or even with a bamboo stick. Do you? Yes, Early Christians were persecuted and murdered and what not. But Early Christians did the same things to the pagans, muslims, Native Americans, so forth and so on. But the question is why? The answer to this is simple, because in the areas the Christians lived in where the majority were pagan, it was because the Roman Pagans feared the Christians. They saw them as a threat. The same can be said about the Christians in Mideval Europe during the Inquisitions, Witch Trials and even the Crusades. In short be respectful to the host countries, follow their rules and that even means don't preach to others. Help out with the countries needs but for your own safety, remember that every life is precious even your own. Throwing that away will make your beliefs worthless. Throwing your life away because of a belief in a savior will become worthless. However helping those in need is more important than a belief, helping others shows that you are a good person, versus saying you're a good person. A more passionate argument against freedom of speech I have never seen. Who among you could balance a human beings right to air his political/religious views without fear of violence or incarceration, against some percieved duty to be courteuos and find free speech wanting ? With regards to foreigners following the law in my own country I can think of several occasions where i would in fact appolaud them for breaking our own laws. For example, when the Westboro Baptist Church wanted to send a party to protest at the funeral of a gay man held here in Britain, I condemned in equal measure the wickedness of the WBC for proposing such a thing and the totalitarian behaviour of the British government in forbidding it. It was not only the WBC's right to picket the funeral that was infringed but also my right to wait at the airport for them and throw every last ounce of venom and abuse I could at such disgusting bigots. And who said anything about imposing beliefs on anybody ? Were talking about the right to air your beliefs and try to convince others in liberal debate, no one least of all me suggested anybody had the right to force people to believe anything. I also dont understand why your supporting Chinas right to suppress freedom of speech on account of it being a great method of suppresing rebeliion confused Lastly youre incorrect to say that no laws are wrong. Morality is subjective, whilst a group of Wahabi Muslims in Saudi Arabia would preach Sharia law and the righteousness of hanging homosexuals and stoning to death adulterors, I myself and I suspect you would see this as being very wrong indeed. You also haven't addressed my argument that its perfectly accetable to ignore temporal laws, in pursuit of spreading the gospel. And you seem to neglect that not every country has freedom of speech written in their constitution nor do they even have one. neutral China is not America. Do not assume that everyone should have the same rights and freedoms as America. neutral
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:57 am
-Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden dio777 -Tsukiyo-Moon Maiden dio777 Someoneiknow dio777 Is'nt this a matter of free speech ? How could I condemn any man for airing his beliefs, peacefully, in a country that is actively repressing those freedoms that I believe are inherent to each and every human being ? As a secularist I would regard any such man a martyr, regardless of what relgious/irreligious beliefs he is preaching. Not every place is America, and thus, you should follow their rules and laws. They do not all have freedom of speech. I'm not condemning that person, but I also will not condone their acts, they stepped into a hostile situation, voluntarily, and decided to try and kindle a greater fire. Thus, I will not give them the honor of being called a martyr. Also, do you not think that God will open an area up in His own due time for missionary work? We do not need to go in their words a blazing and stir up contention, that area will open up in God's due time, not our own. Okay, I think I can approach this on two levels, firstly my ethicial/political inclinations as a secular atheist and secondly in how Jesus suggested that you yourselves as Christians should behave. Before that though, could you tell me why either of us should follow their rules ? I personally believe that bad laws are there to be broken, ignored and otherwise disobeyed. Youre looking at this as a given law barring you from action, but what if a a law was specifically demanding an unchristian, even a sinful course of action ? I'd ask you to withdraw any assetion that we should follow the law simply because its the law. I believe that my rights as a human beings are not granted by any particular govenrment. As I said earlier rights are inhrent to each and every human being, no matter their relgious beliefs or where they travel. If we accept that rights are granted by a government then we also have it accept that they can be taken away, at which points they are of course no longer rights, because rights by there own definition are inalienable. Anything else is a priveledge to be taken away, whenever a particualar government ses fit. Now for you as a Christian Jesus does indeed teach a certain level of co-operation with mans laws, in taxes to Caeser. Mark 12:17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him. And indeed it would behoove you to do so, but lets first ask the question; are the immortal souls of men Caesers due ? As for god opening up an area, yes of ocurse he will, but not in the obvious way you might expect. Wasnt Paul himself imprisoned for his beliefs ? Weren't the other early Christians murdered and persecuted for preaching their beliefs ? I dont think any man has become a martyr, through not proclaiming the Gospel and adhering to the laws of men. When people come here from other countries should the follow our laws or not? As immigrants and or tourists they are to follow the laws. That is expected of them as guests. It is rude and dishonorable for someone not to follow these rules and or laws. It's called etiquette. neutral Learn it. That said the laws in other countries aren't "bad". They shouldn't be broken either. Their laws have very strict punishment backed behind them if they are "bad". Many countries allow whipping using a bamboo stick. If you wish to stay in that country and not end up in jail, beaten or worse, then it's best to follow the rules. Remember, you are a guest in a foreign country. If you misbehave not only are you dishonoring your country, but also whatever deity you worship, and your ancestors, and the people of your home country. In democratic countries we take things like religious freedom for granted and try to impose our religion on other's because we feel it's right. When in reality, it is wrong, immoral, and in most cases....taboo. History has shown us that "witnessing", preaching, etc can change the ideas and the morals of people and cause them to rebel against their governments. Which is why countries like Iraq, China and Russia have strict laws against religious missions. It's to keep people from rebelling and to keep dissenters out. Historical examples can include but aren't limited to the Boxer Rebellion, Hideyoshi Toyotomi, rebellions of India. Also need I remind you that there are such missions that have ended in bloodshed and turmoil. Need I remind you how the Manifest Destiny in America became a failure? Going to help out another country is one thing, but if they have strict laws and even stricter punishment for proselyting, then either leave your pious beliefs at home, or don't go to that country. Just don't preach to them. I don't think preaching about Jesus and trying to convert others is worth getting beaten with a bamboo stick or having them pull of your fingernails with a weird machine or even with a bamboo stick. Do you? Yes, Early Christians were persecuted and murdered and what not. But Early Christians did the same things to the pagans, muslims, Native Americans, so forth and so on. But the question is why? The answer to this is simple, because in the areas the Christians lived in where the majority were pagan, it was because the Roman Pagans feared the Christians. They saw them as a threat. The same can be said about the Christians in Mideval Europe during the Inquisitions, Witch Trials and even the Crusades. In short be respectful to the host countries, follow their rules and that even means don't preach to others. Help out with the countries needs but for your own safety, remember that every life is precious even your own. Throwing that away will make your beliefs worthless. Throwing your life away because of a belief in a savior will become worthless. However helping those in need is more important than a belief, helping others shows that you are a good person, versus saying you're a good person. A more passionate argument against freedom of speech I have never seen. Who among you could balance a human beings right to air his political/religious views without fear of violence or incarceration, against some percieved duty to be courteuos and find free speech wanting ? With regards to foreigners following the law in my own country I can think of several occasions where i would in fact appolaud them for breaking our own laws. For example, when the Westboro Baptist Church wanted to send a party to protest at the funeral of a gay man held here in Britain, I condemned in equal measure the wickedness of the WBC for proposing such a thing and the totalitarian behaviour of the British government in forbidding it. It was not only the WBC's right to picket the funeral that was infringed but also my right to wait at the airport for them and throw every last ounce of venom and abuse I could at such disgusting bigots. And who said anything about imposing beliefs on anybody ? Were talking about the right to air your beliefs and try to convince others in liberal debate, no one least of all me suggested anybody had the right to force people to believe anything. I also dont understand why your supporting Chinas right to suppress freedom of speech on account of it being a great method of suppresing rebeliion confused Lastly youre incorrect to say that no laws are wrong. Morality is subjective, whilst a group of Wahabi Muslims in Saudi Arabia would preach Sharia law and the righteousness of hanging homosexuals and stoning to death adulterors, I myself and I suspect you would see this as being very wrong indeed. You also haven't addressed my argument that its perfectly accetable to ignore temporal laws, in pursuit of spreading the gospel. And you seem to neglect that not every country has freedom of speech written in their constitution nor do they even have one. neutral China is not America. Do not assume that everyone should have the same rights and freedoms as America. neutral Why should I not assume that? Do Chinese people not deserve these rights ?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|