|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:30 pm
MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:37 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible. uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:37 pm
MegaTherion777 mop - THC itself actually retards the growth of cancer cells, thus vaporizing or ingesting it as a brownie/tea will not give you cancer. however, when you smoke it, there are other carcinogens in the plant that get burned up and can indeed cause cancer. waking and baking is a terrible idea. driving while high is a terrible idea. medical and psychological studies have shown that weed is (in general) less harmful to the physical and mental well-being of a person than either alcohol or tobacco. IN GENERAL. of course, if you smoke weed at the same rate as a heavy smoker (1 or more packs a day...translating to something like 20 joints a day or more - and some people do this) it can actually do somewhat more harm than tobacco and alcohol. studies have shown THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) to be effective in the treatment of 220+ medical ailments, from simple things such as influenza, to more complex issues such as recovering from chemotherapy and treatment in cases of HIV/AIDS. if anyone would like to see this research, i'll do my best to find it for you, i believe i have it around here somewhere. in the end, if both alcohol and tobacco are legal, it doesnt really make sense that weed is illegal. people just need to be raised in the proper context, just as with alcohol. also, just as with tobacco and alcohol, the government could regulate it for safety (eliminating the danger of some n00b buying from a dealer they don't know and getting angel-dust laced herb), and they could put hefty taxes on it. marijuana is not physically addictive, though in rare cases, it can become mentally addictive. i am an advocate of drug law reform in general, because most people who are incarcerated for drug possession don't need to be jailed, they need help and rehabilitation. we have overcrowded prisons as it is, and jailing millions of nonviolent offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. /epicwin I always went by the unwritten law of DON'T WAKE AND BAKE but this year I decided, WHY NOT since school is so boring. I thought it was helpful...only had 1 bowl though, and then 3 to 4 more throughout the day/night. If I had the choice, I would only make cannibutter and bake cookies and brownies, but it takes so much weed to do that :/ And I'm broke and jobless. and p.s. I hate vaporizers so much...and (from what I've heard) you can only get lung cancer from smoking it..? Like no other mouth/respitory diseases can arrise from it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:39 pm
Mopsicle MegaTherion777 mop - THC itself actually retards the growth of cancer cells, thus vaporizing or ingesting it as a brownie/tea will not give you cancer. however, when you smoke it, there are other carcinogens in the plant that get burned up and can indeed cause cancer. waking and baking is a terrible idea. driving while high is a terrible idea. medical and psychological studies have shown that weed is (in general) less harmful to the physical and mental well-being of a person than either alcohol or tobacco. IN GENERAL. of course, if you smoke weed at the same rate as a heavy smoker (1 or more packs a day...translating to something like 20 joints a day or more - and some people do this) it can actually do somewhat more harm than tobacco and alcohol. studies have shown THC (the active ingredient in marijuana) to be effective in the treatment of 220+ medical ailments, from simple things such as influenza, to more complex issues such as recovering from chemotherapy and treatment in cases of HIV/AIDS. if anyone would like to see this research, i'll do my best to find it for you, i believe i have it around here somewhere. in the end, if both alcohol and tobacco are legal, it doesnt really make sense that weed is illegal. people just need to be raised in the proper context, just as with alcohol. also, just as with tobacco and alcohol, the government could regulate it for safety (eliminating the danger of some n00b buying from a dealer they don't know and getting angel-dust laced herb), and they could put hefty taxes on it. marijuana is not physically addictive, though in rare cases, it can become mentally addictive. i am an advocate of drug law reform in general, because most people who are incarcerated for drug possession don't need to be jailed, they need help and rehabilitation. we have overcrowded prisons as it is, and jailing millions of nonviolent offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. /epicwin I always went by the unwritten law of DON'T WAKE AND BAKE but this year I decided, WHY NOT since school is so boring. I thought it was helpful...only had 1 bowl though, and then 3 to 4 more throughout the day/night. If I had the choice, I would only make cannibutter and bake cookies and brownies, but it takes so much weed to do that :/ And I'm broke and jobless. and p.s. I hate vaporizers so much...and (from what I've heard) you can only get lung cancer from smoking it..? Like no other mouth/respitory diseases can arrise from it. dude, you're smoking too much. wake and bake, AND 4 more bowls throughout the day? how the ******** do you afford that? you must be smoking schwagg? or maybe midgrade?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:42 pm
Speaking of dealing...
I was just suspended because this kid ratted on me and my roommate when he got caught (like an idiot) smoking in his dorm room without opening a window, without using a spoof, and without putting a towel under the door. (Boarding School)
He said my roommates name and went to him, and he confessed and gave the dean of students our ounce that we had. After further investigation, they found 400 $ in my room (from christmas and selling my ipod) and accused me of dealing and I was suspended for 10 days, 72 community work hours, and GP with random drug testing.
I'm not a dealer by any means, but I did sell 2 grams to the kid who got caught because he wanted some. I sold it for *literally* 60 $. I was joking when I said it, but he was stupid enough to buy it.
Moral of the story:
DON'T SELL TO ADHD AND DYSLEXIC MORONS.
Now I have to wait 4 months until I can light up T-T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 2:46 pm
MegaTherion777 dude, you're smoking too much. wake and bake, AND 4 more bowls throughout the day? how the ******** do you afford that? you must be smoking schwagg? or maybe midgrade? mids if anything. It was decent, but it was mainly because the bowls to my bong are smaller than expected. It's a homemade one that I can dissassble and keep in my room without people noticing. But my roommate is from Greenich, CT. That's how razz It would be fair to say that the bowl is about half the size you're probably used to. Which sucks, because when I go to a regular bong and take a hit, I feel like a lightweight lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:06 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible. uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection. Not any dealer/grower but the bigtime ones who give a cut the feds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:57 pm
you sold 2gs of midgrade for $60?!?!
wow, that kid did NOT know what he was doing. even named strains arent that expensive. but that was pretty obvious - smoking in his room... without ANY precautions... even WITH precautions, it's a much better idea to amoke outside in an out of the way spot than it is to smoke in the room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:09 pm
MegaTherion777 you sold 2gs of midgrade for $60?!?!wow, that kid did NOT know what he was doing. even named strains arent that expensive. but that was pretty obvious - smoking in his room... without ANY precautions... even WITH precautions, it's a much better idea to amoke outside in an out of the way spot than it is to smoke in the room. Yeah he's an idiot. Poser kinda kid would thought he knew a thing or two about weed. He didn't even know sizes. He came up to me and asked for a "baggie". I asked him "What the ******** is a 'baggie' ?" He explained it, saying that it was the space inbetween your pointer finger and thumb when you extended them and touched them. I laughed in his face and called him a retard, and then asked how many grams he wanted. He said "Uhhh....I dunno...LIKE 1 maybe LIKE 2 grams...or something like that...like *studder studder studder*". "Tell you what, kid. I'll sell you 2 grams for 60 $ (sarcastic tone)" "Yeah like...that sounds...like.. good..." I shouldn't have sold him anything, he really did not know what he was doing. He didn't know the diff. between a blunt and a joint, or a bong and a bubbler. It was funny going to the honor comittee, because they saw my ounce and said "...so you bought that, and sold him this LITTLE BAG of 2 grams to him for SIXTY DOLLARS? Wow....Impressive" rofl I still laugh at him to this day, because he's such an idiot. This is what he did. He tried to make a bong like mine, which was complete failure so I heard. And instead of breathing through a spoof, him and his idiot friend used a VACCUM CLEANER and blew through that... WHAT THE ********?! Not to mention his room is RIGHT outside the dorm parent's room, window and everything. I mean, I smoked in my room all times of the day and didn't get caught or even close to getting caught. We were so good at keeping smell down and there was no smoke in the room or anything. We also have this sick high powered fan out our window that blocks view outside and exchanges air (one fan in, on fan out). I can't believe he got caught...he's an idiot. Kids in the dorm told me they could smell it on the third floor (he was on the first). Can't wait to graduate so I can kick his a** razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:45 pm
no, you shouldn't have sold to him. of course, i would never sell to anyone. of course, i usually don't have any, even if i wanted to sell, and when i do, it's never more than 2 grams. but you definitely should not have sold to him.
idk what this spoof is you speak of. is that your name for the paper towel tube with dryer sheets in it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 7:46 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible. uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection. Not any dealer/grower but the bigtime ones who give a cut the feds. i don't think you understand how the weed trade works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:29 pm
Aguments for both sides:
18: I feel that if you can go out, get a gun, and die for America, you should have rights to a beer.
21: I can attest, that my self (any many others who I asked) were much more mature at 21 then 18, it doest seem like much, but I learned more about my self right when I got out of highschool then I did k-12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:11 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible. uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection. Not any dealer/grower but the bigtime ones who give a cut the feds. i don't think you understand how the weed trade works I do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 10:01 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 offenders who would better be served by rehab is just silly digi - i see you buy into the CIA bake-sale conspiracy theory. i have heard this before, and done a little bit of research, but you're confusing your drugs. it is narcotic that the CIA supposedly brings in - cocaine, opiates, etc. much bigger profit margin, and people can't grow their own, so the government (in theory) would have nearly total control of all narcotics coming into the country. Well, I meant they themselves don't bring it in but they protect the people who do, aswell as the ones that grow it here in the US, therefor they are responsible. uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection. Not any dealer/grower but the bigtime ones who give a cut the feds. i don't think you understand how the weed trade works I do. but weed is too easy to grow, you don't get large kingpins like you do with narcotics. the government isn't going to wast their time with weed dealers because even a large weed operation is nothing compared to a narcotics ring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:02 am
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 uhm... no, they dont. trust me. i know people who used to grow (one that still does). i know dealers. they're not getting protection. Not any dealer/grower but the bigtime ones who give a cut the feds. i don't think you understand how the weed trade works I do. but weed is too easy to grow, you don't get large kingpins like you do with narcotics. the government isn't going to wast their time with weed dealers because even a large weed operation is nothing compared to a narcotics ring. are you saying there is no large growing corporations? lol There are plenty of huge operations, and there are few arrests, but only because of accidents and to make it look like they are trying to put a stop to it. Heres an example: http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=4579512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
