|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:30 am
SlaineWildfire I still don't understand what this veil is supposed to be. In my opinion, there's nothing that separates magic from "the rest of the world". Magic is a completely natural occurrence, and something that can be explained completely by natural laws. To paraphrase someone famous and smart, any technology sufficiently advanced is considered magic. Magic isn't "strange", "unnatural", "weird" or even "supernatural". Nothing unnatural can exist, as the world is natural and therefore everything in it is natural. Magic is simply the manipulation of energy, and therefore, every action that we take that affects the world of energy is a magical act. Eating, breathing, flipping on a light switch, all of it is magic. There are simply some acts of magic that we cannot logically explain just yet. Does this mean that there is no explanation? Nope. It means that we simply don't understand it yet. There will be an explanation in the future, once our brains are developed enough to understand how the world works in its entirety, but I wouldn't count on that happening any time soon. Also, forgive me if I don't make much sense. I've been awake since 7 am, and it's almost 1 am now. x_x Check out one of our Veil threads for a total throwdown of discussion, but it's the magical plastiwrap that keeps the world of magic/the dead/astral/alternate possibilities from being here at the same time. True, you can say magic is natural, but I'm gonna say nothing can be explained completely. Nothing has been so far, and I don't think it ever will be. We can't even ever be really sure about what we've found out so far.
I'm sure if we shifted our paradigm about what we're doing, more people would like it. If we called it something like Calling Down the Spirit World, or Releasing the Astral, or Freeing the Energy of Magic, doesn't sound as anarchistic as Tear Down that Damn Wall. But same basic idea. I say we play with it. We learn what we can. I know the line where we throw up our hands and say, "we shouldn't ******** with this," and we aren't nearly there yet.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:33 am
ChiyuriYami KilledbyKarma a**l Jesus KilledbyKarma ChiyuriYami oh.. this thread just made me remember I was supposed to try and break the Viel.. guess I should start working on that.. O rly? And my name is God. Nice to meet you. rolleyes rofl Why thank you AJ. Would I be correct to believe my wit has been missed when dealing with...the deluded ones? I believe you should go read the rules of the guild.. You seem to not know them well.. Okay, future reference, no one, any arguement in here, ever, pulls the "You don't know the rules" card. I'll go change them if you try. They are pretty damn fluid around here, just don't be too much of a douche. People do get away with an amount of belittleing sometimes, if they have a good point or the ideas are flawed. Everyone will be fine, just no bitchy fights.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:15 am
Of course then there's the 'I made or helped make half of them and know every damn loophole we left open' argument for myself when that card is played against me Josh.
I agree with Dorian. We don't know. We don't even know if it exist. And believe me if I can't feel it it's hidden pretty damn well (enough to warrant the 'don't mess with' policy) or doesn't exist.
And yes I TOTALLY condone ripping apart something no one understands possibly causing damage to the lives of billions to 'make it more exciting'. The morals of bored people astound me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:03 am
SlaineWildfire I still don't understand what this veil is supposed to be. In my opinion, there's nothing that separates magic from "the rest of the world". Magic is a completely natural occurrence, and something that can be explained completely by natural laws. To paraphrase someone famous and smart, any technology sufficiently advanced is considered magic. Magic isn't "strange", "unnatural", "weird" or even "supernatural". Nothing unnatural can exist, as the world is natural and therefore everything in it is natural. Magic is simply the manipulation of energy, and therefore, every action that we take that affects the world of energy is a magical act. Eating, breathing, flipping on a light switch, all of it is magic. There are simply some acts of magic that we cannot logically explain just yet. Does this mean that there is no explanation? Nope. It means that we simply don't understand it yet. There will be an explanation in the future, once our brains are developed enough to understand how the world works in its entirety, but I wouldn't count on that happening any time soon. Also, forgive me if I don't make much sense. I've been awake since 7 am, and it's almost 1 am now. x_x I don't mean to sound antagonistic here, so if that's how I'm coming off, you can poke me in the eye or something. I'm all for the "everything is natural and magick" supposition, but if you understand the meaning of 'magick' as literally being 'change in conformity with with will', you open the floodgates by being really vague, and a whole host of activities that you wouldn't consider to be magickal in the least become 'magick'. Putting on a coat, getting a glass of water, feeding your cat, pinging a rubber band at your best friend... when you sit down to read a book of magick, is this the kind of thing you expect to find inside the text? Not on your nelly. Just because these things are "technically" magick doesn't make them so, and I think we can make a distinction between magick and everyday things (although it'd be a tenuous distinction at best). Likewise, the "everything that exists is thusly natural" supposition follows the same route, although I think it's logically sound and valid. Lastly, I'd like to say I'm all for pretending that there is a Veil so we can poke holes in it to see what happens. Tearing it down completely sounds more than a little difficult, so "lightly ripping" the veil sounds like a better prospect to me. If we get no results, I guess we can assume the Veil doesn't exist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:36 am
I think the reason why we don't read about simple acts of magic when we open a book on magic is because we already know how to do them, we don't need to be taught. We're taught as a child how to use a fork to move food to mouth, just like we're taught as children that one added to one creates two. You wouldn't open a book on advanced calculus and expect to be taught the orders of operation, you should know them by now. Books that we buy on magic, just as books that we buy on any other subject, cannot always be comprehensive. If any book in the world were truly comprehensive, the book would never ever end.
And, just as an additional thought... Maybe we should have books that teach us to recognize daily acts (like breathing, preparing food, etc) as magic. Maybe then we'd value life more... Maybe not, but maybe we would.
And to respond to the other comment left to me... Why do we assume that other worlds aren't interacting with our own? Just because we cannot currently perceive them doesn't mean that they're not. It doesn't mean they are, but how can we assume that they're not?
Also, ghosts interact with our world all the time. And if you can't ever really understand anything, then why bother trying?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:25 am
SlaineWildfire I think the reason why we don't read about simple acts of magic when we open a book on magic is because we already know how to do them, we don't need to be taught. We're taught as a child how to use a fork to move food to mouth, just like we're taught as children that one added to one creates two. You wouldn't open a book on advanced calculus and expect to be taught the orders of operation, you should know them by now. Books that we buy on magic, just as books that we buy on any other subject, cannot always be comprehensive. If any book in the world were truly comprehensive, the book would never ever end. And, just as an additional thought... Maybe we should have books that teach us to recognize daily acts (like breathing, preparing food, etc) as magic. Maybe then we'd value life more... Maybe not, but maybe we would. And to respond to the other comment left to me... Why do we assume that other worlds aren't interacting with our own? Just because we cannot currently perceive them doesn't mean that they're not. It doesn't mean they are, but how can we assume that they're not? Also, ghosts interact with our world all the time. And if you can't ever really understand anything, then why bother trying? I understand daily acts as being magick. Trouble is, I'm already really good at them. If I can do something a little more uncommon with magick, I'd like to try that, to do something different.
I do agree ghosts interact with our world a lot. I don't assume other worlds don't.
If the notion you can't really understand anything makes everything pointless to you, then I'm sorry, but it's a spectre you have to live with in the business of being human. You can pretty much rely on "I think, therefore I am," and everything else is circumspect. Me, I just think it makes the whole world look a little more chaotic, and makes you reevaluate your thoughts on it. I've taken some time to try to understand a lot of things. What is that knowledge worth? Maybe a lot, maybe nothing. I'll never really know, but that's okay. I'll keep trying.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:16 pm
If I recall, Post Modern Magick by Dunn mentions in the start of the book how something like stirring a cup of coffee with a spoon can be a magic act(ivity). Though he goes on to say how one would need to have correspondant meanings associated with whats involved, activities and objects and such. I've seen similar things about breathing in an aura book, and intaking food or drink in shamanistic books. I'm inclined to leave the meanings and depths of the actions to the devices of the one who contemplates it rather then me tossing in my half-assed cents.
I'm inclined to believe 'ghosts' and 'otherworlds' interact with ours, like I'm inclined to believe other things, that doesn't mean I'm right necissarily, or wrong. You're starting to grasp my nihilistic ideas though. I figure other worlds existing and interacting is as likely as observations being selection and illusionary in actuality.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:45 pm
SlaineWildfire (first off... haven't seen you around for quite some time! Good to see ya!), thank you. I was going to post something somewhat similar to what you said but you did a fine enough job that I don't feel any need to elaborate.
Veil? WHAT veil? 'Nuff said.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:12 pm
Joshua_Ritter I understand daily acts as being magick. Trouble is, I'm already really good at them. If I can do something a little more uncommon with magick, I'd like to try that, to do something different.
I do agree ghosts interact with our world a lot. I don't assume other worlds don't.
If the notion you can't really understand anything makes everything pointless to you, then I'm sorry, but it's a spectre you have to live with in the business of being human. You can pretty much rely on "I think, therefore I am," and everything else is circumspect. Me, I just think it makes the whole world look a little more chaotic, and makes you reevaluate your thoughts on it. I've taken some time to try to understand a lot of things. What is that knowledge worth? Maybe a lot, maybe nothing. I'll never really know, but that's okay. I'll keep trying. I'm not saying it's pointless, I'm not really claiming anything about that, I'm asking what the point is. Why do you feel that you need to try to find out something if you can't know it's true? That's all I was asking. *shrugs* My personal opinions have actually only come into play about the nature of magic, everything else is just hypothetical.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:44 pm
On a more refreshing note: Does anyone happen to know where the New Age term of "The Veil" came from? I'm sure there are several ancient references to something like a veil that is between the world of the living and the world of the dead, but that seems to be different from the contemporary definition of the term, or perhaps included in it.
Honestly, I think that sometimes people cite the ambiguous Veil as a reason why they can't do something. "The Veil keeps all of our powers in check." "Without the Veil magic would be so much more powerful." "Without the Veil, everyone would know we aren't a bunch of loonies."
Similar to the concept of "binds" that I see being slung around in a few places these days. The reason these people can't access their super magical powers from past lives is because they have been "bound" by their higher self or by other powers for one reason or another.
I think all of this is just excuses for why we can't do something, rather than actual things that exist. I'm a believer in the idea that our limitations are created by ourselves and our chains and walls are the ones in our minds.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:49 pm
Yeah I worked really hard to break the barriers I'd created in my mind as a child only to have all the work ruined when too much stress sent me into minor depression. I've regained less than half my former abilities but my knowledge is so much more than it was that I don't care. Power is nothing without something to use it for and I'm more comfortable not having it so I don't need to fear misusing it. Which is why I'm so against people who want to break the 'Veil' if it exist. You just can't make that choice. It's as bad as Hitler deciding all the Jews should die. Or the Christian's Crusades. Or the Moorish invasion. Or Islamic Radicals and their super-Jihad. It's making a decision for other people that you have no right to make.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:56 pm
Obscurus On a more refreshing note: Does anyone happen to know where the New Age term of "The Veil" came from? I'm sure there are several ancient references to something like a veil that is between the world of the living and the world of the dead, but that seems to be different from the contemporary definition of the term, or perhaps included in it. Honestly, I think that sometimes people cite the ambiguous Veil as a reason why they can't do something. "The Veil keeps all of our powers in check." "Without the Veil magic would be so much more powerful." "Without the Veil, everyone would know we aren't a bunch of loonies." Similar to the concept of "binds" that I see being slung around in a few places these days. The reason these people can't access their super magical powers from past lives is because they have been "bound" by their higher self or by other powers for one reason or another. I think all of this is just excuses for why we can't do something, rather than actual things that exist. I'm a believer in the idea that our limitations are created by ourselves and our chains and walls are the ones in our minds. Agreed on most counts. The veil is one of those really weird concepts that just seem to boom into the occult scene out of nowhere -- kind of like otherkin, binds, the Threefold law... hell, even the 'astral realm', if you look back a little further. KilledbyKarma Yeah I worked really hard to break the barriers I'd created in my mind as a child only to have all the work ruined when too much stress sent me into minor depression. I've regained less than half my former abilities but my knowledge is so much more than it was that I don't care. Power is nothing without something to use it for and I'm more comfortable not having it so I don't need to fear misusing it. Which is why I'm so against people who want to break the 'Veil' if it exist. You just can't make that choice. It's as bad as Hitler deciding all the Jews should die. Or the Christian's Crusades. Or the Moorish invasion. Or Islamic Radicals and their super-Jihad. It's making a decision for other people that you have no right to make. Corollary of Godwin's Law. Assuming the Veil exists, I don't think you can really compare all possible outcomes as anything close to genocide. At best, it's hyperbole - at worst, it's a reductio ad Hitlerum. Although I agree, if it does exist, and can be torn down in its entirety, it probably shouldn't be torn down completely unless you have a fair idea what would happen. Apologies in case this post makes it seem like I believe two entirely different things. I kind of do.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 3:56 am
Not really. You used enough 'ifs' for it to be fine. And I know I was harsh but I was comparing the decision made not the act itself. Hitler DECIDED for the Jews that they wouldn't live. The Pope DECIDED for the Saracens that they didn't deserve the 'Holy Land' and he did. The I-Radicals DECIDED that their victims don't deserve to live. If someone destroys the 'Veil' if it exist then they are DECIDING for everyone in the world and that's just wrong. Even if it only makes the weird a bit weirder it's still changing something.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:53 pm
Okay. The discussion has become the same thing over and over. Now I want help. I want to tear down, weaken, open up, ect. The Veil, just for me, for a tiny area, whatever. Let's define people's theories of it and then different ways it could be bent or broken, depending. I will then attempt to do so, or experiment with such, and report my findings.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:42 pm
KilledbyKarma Of course then there's the 'I made or helped make half of them and know every damn loophole we left open' argument for myself when that card is played against me Josh. I agree with Dorian. We don't know. We don't even know if it exist. And believe me if I can't feel it it's hidden pretty damn well (enough to warrant the 'don't mess with' policy) or doesn't exist. And yes I TOTALLY condone ripping apart something no one understands possibly causing damage to the lives of billions to 'make it more exciting'. The morals of bored people astound me. i take it you've played halo3? rofl (and shows how much you know it was the logic and moral of someone who has a mental disability razz shows what you know) assuming this doesn't 'break the rules', i really hate people like you who assume your better then everyone else without any idea of someones abilities. for all you know, you could have the shittiest ability magick and psionics has ever seen on this earth and just think your 'so damn awesome guy'. truthfully, i don't really care what you have to say what you will say or what you have said. some more food for thought perhaps? what if it exists and its so weak from gradual corrosion that everyone is unable to sense it. or perhaps its not even powerful or ******** with able to the point we cant sense it? what if it exists and we just plain old cant sense it? ill quote someone, (think its someone from the guild, but maybe not.) "your not special, your a part of the same decomposing heap of organic material as the rest of us." ill even give you a chance to redeem yourself right now, because you powers are so damn great. if your such hot s**t at psionics, magick, or anything for that matter, ill give you 3 days to figure out two things. my middle name, and what is on top of the dresser in my room at the head of my bed. s**t, ill put it on top of all the other stuff there. don't pull the 'it's impossible s**t' either, because pyrokin had a very similar experiment in which someone who 'wasn't as talented as yourself' could get the answer.middle name is optional if not impossible, but your such hot s**t you might as well use that /tiny/ bit of energy to find that out too. so please, unless you can back up that your ability is as big as your ******** ahead and impress me. im writing down the time right now, and two days from now unless you get the right answer, your a bullshitting bullshitter. EDIT: yes, they are curse words. if anyone finds them offense, ill take them out.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|