|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:48 pm
Harusame Mizukishi So I want to do something semi-constructive.
But what?... =/ Chat with me? blaugh
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:50 pm
Medeus Harusame Mizukishi So I want to do something semi-constructive.
But what?... =/ Chat with me? blaugh
Not exactly what I meant. I mean like like working on some kind of project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:52 pm
Harusame Mizukishi Medeus Harusame Mizukishi So I want to do something semi-constructive.
But what?... =/ Chat with me? blaugh
Not exactly what I meant. I mean like like working on some kind of project.Pssh, whats the difference? xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:55 pm
Medeus Harusame Mizukishi Medeus Harusame Mizukishi So I want to do something semi-constructive.
But what?... =/ Chat with me? blaugh
Not exactly what I meant. I mean like like working on some kind of project.Pssh, whats the difference? xD
Good question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:15 pm
Medeus 1. There's a difference between being an observer of what you see, and being the one who put it there, isn't it? Anybody can look at the trees and the rivers and stars and have their opinion about it, but nobody here can claim they put them there. And everybody has to agree that they're looking at the same thing before they have different opinions about it, otherwise there's great mis-communication and nobody is even talking about the same thing. I think we are having a semantic war about this one. it is your perception of reality that can vary, not reality itself. no one is arguing that my house is blue, but what can be argued is if it's a nice color for the house or not. I'm offering that if you take things positively, glass half full style, your life will be more fun Medeus 2. I think it's pretty fair to say that if a couple divorces each other, than they never really had true love to begin with. On the other hand, look at all the couples who've been married for over 50 years, claiming to Love each other. Isn't it fair to look at them, look at what they do, and see that something must have kept them together for so long? And then after you recognize that there's a bond, isn't it fair to call that bond Love? When somebody does something nice for you, don't you like that? Don't you like it when somebody gets you an extra napkin, or buys you lunch, or thinks of something really creative to give you as a present, for no reason at all, other than the fact that they really like you, and really like hanging out with you? At that point, it isn't so much about the gift itself, but the reason the gift was presented in the first place. Obviously you would never call that attitude Hate, would you? Even in other cultures, where there are more rules and restrictive laws about who can talk to who, and processes they have to go through, there are ways to do things that have meaning to the ones they claim to Love. When someone shows you Love, you know it. You can tell when it's genuine, can't you? Or don't you trust your instincts? WHAT IS LOVE?! What do you mean instincts? Can you honestly tell when love is genuine? it seems that idea raises an argument with your earlier point; that divorced couples probably didn't have true love. I think its neigh impossible to say love feels exactly this way, or that love is this strong or important or what have you. Love, in my personal experience, has been a very confusing subject matter, up until just recently, and who knows, later on i may come to realize i still have no idea what the ******** im talking about, so I wouldnt say love is so easy to define, good sir. Medeus 3. So if somebody murdered your little sister, you would say to them, "Oh you probably just didn't think it was all that big a deal, no worries"? I mean, if they did that you'd probably just let them off the hook, because even though it only affected everybody in your household and everybody who knew her, they didn't really know what they were doing, so no biggie. That's what you're saying. Just because they didnt think of it as a big deal, doesn't mean i would just be like; sure, no probs. judgement calls are often a large part of these things, and when compared to the generally more sane puplic, these murderers do in fact look like crazy people. they just probably aren't in their minds, thats the whole perspective problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:29 pm
I still maintain that the best outlook is the one in which you demand to see the manager and complain that you ordered wine, not water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharkbutt The Orgiastic Crew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:30 pm
Wantcookie I still maintain that the best outlook is the one in which you demand to see the manager and complain that you ordered wine, not water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:54 pm
Harusame Mizukishi Wantcookie I still maintain that the best outlook is the one in which you demand to see the manager and complain that you ordered wine, not water. Not giving a ******** is pretty sweet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:16 pm
Wantcookie I still maintain that the best outlook is the one in which you demand to see the manager and complain that you ordered wine, not water. I NEVER SAID WHAT IT WAS FILLED WITH... FOR YOUR INFORMATION IT WAS WHITE RHINOCEROS TEARS, HARVESTED WITH SOFT JAZZ FROM THE FINEST COMPILATION OF MARIACHI OPERA BANDS. THESE TEARS WERE THEN IMPORTED TO INDIA, JUST SO THEY COULD BE IMPORTED FROM INDIA, TO BE IMPORTED TO THE RESTAURANT AT WHICH I AM CURRENTLY SEATED. BY THE WAY GUILDIES, TODAY IS NATIONAL CAPSLOCK DAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:22 pm
OH YEAH I DIDN'T EVEN NOTICE IT WAS AFTER ******** YEAH CAPS LOCK DAY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:41 pm
Cabron LaSwan OH YEAH I DIDN'T EVEN NOTICE IT WAS AFTER ******** YEAH CAPS LOCK DAY ONE OF MY FAVORITE DAYS, FOR SURE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:54 pm
lol Why did you split it all up like that, now I have to quote your post as a whole. xD Rhed, I'm really not trying to make a point by arguing with you, I'm mostly agreeing with you, than explaining why you're right, if you're right, than going back and challenging you to think critically about what I just said, and/or what You just said. So I'm not trying to prove you wrong, I'm attempting to let you be right, and then make sure You know Why you're right. Eh? 1. lol Than say what you mean, and mean what you say, because I responded to your comment that said you agree with my "We are all creators of our own realities" statement. So.... 2. If Love is hard for you to define, it's probably because you've heard a lot of conflicting things about what Love is from people who presumed to show you "love" but than it ended poorly, and so you don't really know where the line is between true words based on true actions. It's another Semantics war. Well if you can't define Love for what it is, maybe you can try to define it by what it's Not. Love doesn't murder people, does it? 3. You're right. Nobody thinks of himself as a bad person. But that's the problem about some perceptions. Doesn't matter what they thought of what they did, the thing they did was bad, and they had to pay the price for it; they had to submit to the authorities because of what they did. Not only that, but if somebody is living a dilluded life where they're thinking one thing, and doing something completely different, nobody trusts them. They have no integrity. What you see/meet in person is NOT what you get if you were to get into their thought processes. That make sense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:05 pm
Medeus lol Why did you split it all up like that, now I have to quote your post as a whole. xD Rhed, I'm really not trying to make a point by arguing with you, I'm mostly agreeing with you, than explaining why you're right, if you're right, than going back and challenging you to think critically about what I just said, and/or what You just said. So I'm not trying to prove you wrong, I'm attempting to let you be right, and then make sure You know Why you're right. Eh? 1. lol Than say what you mean, and mean what you say, because I responded to your comment that said you agree with my "We are all creators of our own realities" statement. So.... 2. If Love is hard for you to define, it's probably because you've heard a lot of conflicting things about what Love is from people who presumed to show you "love" but than it ended poorly, and so you don't really know where the line is between true words based on true actions. It's another Semantics war. Well if you can't define Love for what it is, maybe you can try to define it by what it's Not. Love doesn't murder people, does it? 3. You're right. Nobody thinks of himself as a bad person. But that's the problem about some perceptions. Doesn't matter what they thought of what they did, the thing they did was bad, and they had to pay the price for it; they had to submit to the authorities because of what they did. Not only that, but if somebody is living a dilluded life where they're thinking one thing, and doing something completely different, nobody trusts them. They have no integrity. What you see/meet in person is NOT what you get if you were to get into their thought processes. That make sense? 1. I TRIED TO BUT IT WAS HARD xd 2. I THINK LOVE (FOR THE MOST PART) IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE UP TO INTERPRETATION. PERHAPS ITS A MORE CONFUSING THING FOR ME THAN YOU. BUT APPARENTLY AS SOON AS YOU HAVE A CHILD OF YOUR OWN IT BECOMES PRETTY CLEAR. I GUESS ILL GET BACK TO YOU IN 10-20 YEARS 3. I THINK WE'RE PRETTY MUCH SAYING THE SAME THING HERE. EXCEPT THAT PHILOSOPHICALLY ITS HARD TO SAY SOMETHING IS INTRINSICALLY RIGHT OR WRONG. THE ENTIRE MORAL COMPASS IS BASED ON WHICH PARTY YELLS THE LOUDEST. IN A LESS CONSTRUCTED SOCIETY, WHATS SO BAD ABOUT KILLING? IT PROBABLY BENEFITS YOU, AND YOU'RE PRIORITY NUMBER ONE. OF COURSE THIS BRINGS US INTO AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DISCUSSION, BUT RELEVENT NONE THE LESS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:08 pm
Rhed King 1. I TRIED TO BUT IT WAS HARD xd 2. I THINK LOVE (FOR THE MOST PART) IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE UP TO INTERPRETATION. PERHAPS ITS A MORE CONFUSING THING FOR ME THAN YOU. BUT APPARENTLY AS SOON AS YOU HAVE A CHILD OF YOUR OWN IT BECOMES PRETTY CLEAR. I GUESS ILL GET BACK TO YOU IN 10-20 YEARS 3. I THINK WE'RE PRETTY MUCH SAYING THE SAME THING HERE. EXCEPT THAT PHILOSOPHICALLY ITS HARD TO SAY SOMETHING IS INTRINSICALLY RIGHT OR WRONG. THE ENTIRE MORAL COMPASS IS BASED ON WHICH PARTY YELLS THE LOUDEST. IN A LESS CONSTRUCTED SOCIETY, WHATS SO BAD ABOUT KILLING? IT PROBABLY BENEFITS YOU, AND YOU'RE PRIORITY NUMBER ONE. OF COURSE THIS BRINGS US INTO AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DISCUSSION, BUT RELEVENT NONE THE LESS. lol Mmkay, well answer me this then: What happens when you die?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:12 pm
Medeus Rhed King 1. I TRIED TO BUT IT WAS HARD xd 2. I THINK LOVE (FOR THE MOST PART) IS ALWAYS GOING TO BE UP TO INTERPRETATION. PERHAPS ITS A MORE CONFUSING THING FOR ME THAN YOU. BUT APPARENTLY AS SOON AS YOU HAVE A CHILD OF YOUR OWN IT BECOMES PRETTY CLEAR. I GUESS ILL GET BACK TO YOU IN 10-20 YEARS 3. I THINK WE'RE PRETTY MUCH SAYING THE SAME THING HERE. EXCEPT THAT PHILOSOPHICALLY ITS HARD TO SAY SOMETHING IS INTRINSICALLY RIGHT OR WRONG. THE ENTIRE MORAL COMPASS IS BASED ON WHICH PARTY YELLS THE LOUDEST. IN A LESS CONSTRUCTED SOCIETY, WHATS SO BAD ABOUT KILLING? IT PROBABLY BENEFITS YOU, AND YOU'RE PRIORITY NUMBER ONE. OF COURSE THIS BRINGS US INTO AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT DISCUSSION, BUT RELEVENT NONE THE LESS. lol Mmkay, well answer me this then: What happens when you die? WHUT. I HAVE NO IDEA AND NEITHER DO YOU. PHYSICALLY, YOUR BODY DECAYS AND ROTS IN GENERALLY 3 TO FIVE WEEKS. OTHER THAN THAT, IM CLUELESS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
