|
|
| What do you think? |
| With |
|
66% |
[ 39 ] |
| Not with |
|
33% |
[ 20 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:17 pm
.+[Incognito]+. I'm against it because of my religion. That is what I believe in. the end. Yes. It is your right not to like, it but we still can't go around saying they can't marry. Crap. I'll stop comenting.~.~ It's a habit.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:18 pm
chosenofchukani theangeldark Tenshi_Tengoku I'm neutral for the most part. It could go either way and I really couldn't care more or less.
Though, I will contest how the same-sex marriage laws are being made. The government has no right to rule over something like this. The law should be put up by a vote from the people and not left for the government to decide. The government is sticking their foot in every door in every state and I think it has to stop. This shouldn't be made into a government affair, but should be left to the individual states and the residents of those states to decide. Yes. Big brother likes to rule. Actually, before it was legalized in Massachussetts 11 other states had a vote to see if people wanted it on the next ballot. The people shot it down in all 11 states, then Mass. passed a law legalizing it with no vote at all.
Aw, well, at least it's going up for a vote in more states then I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:29 pm
I'm just bumping this up to get more votes and opions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:31 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:35 pm
basically its like Arden's sig says people believe that homesexuals shouldnt get married people also believe that the moon is mayd of cheese but that doesnt make them right
i would say more about this but it would strech the screen and brake the guild rules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:39 pm
chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:45 pm
Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. Yeah. There are people out there marring people twice their age. And they are complaining about gay people?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:48 pm
Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. I'm against the marriages, not those people being together, they should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. It should be called something else, but...opinions are like assholes...everyones got one and everyone thinkes everybody elses stinks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:49 pm
chosenofchukani Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. I'm against the marriages, not those people being together, they should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. It should be called something else, but...opinions are like assholes...everyones got one and everyone thinkes everybody elses stinks. The ***** wasn't meant as a point.... I just felt like telling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:49 pm
chosenofchukani Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. I'm against the marriages, not those people being together, they should have the same rights as heterosexual couples. It should be called something else, but...opinions are like assholes...everyones got one and everyone thinkes everybody elses stinks. But what SHOULD it be called....We need a girl president...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 1:52 pm
Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. Yeah. There are people out there marring people twice their age. And they are complaining about gay people?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2005 11:05 pm
WAit a minute...Why DID Greeks do that? eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:00 am
What DON'T I think of same-sex marriages? *eyebrow-waggle*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:02 am
It is against my religion,but I don't care because it is there buisness if they want to and not mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:03 am
theangeldark Neztnerol chosenofchukani theangeldark chosenofchukani seeing as you're asking peoples opinions, I'm against them considering- a marriage is the union of a man and a woman, by definition By definition? I think it just means untieing two PEOPLE, not man and woman. The definition is thousands of years old, and it does state " the union of a man and a woman" Greeks had sex with small children thousands of years ago..... I'm not against same sex marriages. You cannot decide who attracts you; who you fall in love with. Yeah. There are people out there marring people twice their age. And they are complaining about gay people? actually many greeks were gay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[Onigiri]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/5a/0e/3d6c689c150e5a_flip.png?t=1351406306_6.00_00)
![[Saturos]'s avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/6f/5d/660e199175d6f_flip.png?t=1286483014_6.00_11)