Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Hard-Core System Of A Down Guild! =3 Have You Elected th

Back to Guilds

 

 

Reply Political Discussion (lol internet warfare.)
Ideal Government. Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Pick
  Communism
  Monarchy
  Limited Monarchy
  Republic
  Democracy
  ..Anarchy. (must have support)
  None of the above
View Results

johnny foreigner

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:41 pm


emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.

Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.

Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.

Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop

anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules.
second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole.

Anarchy - You know what I mean.. sweatdrop It just won't work, period.

And Communism - That's not what I mean. The classroom thing was an example of how the system works. I'm not saying people are better than others at all. It's an attempt to please everybody, but it won't work, simply because of the selfish nature of human beings.

the reason a communism would work is that because the people in the communism want it to be a communism and live for the good of the whole. those who want the communism arent selfish.


I agree with that.
And slackers wouldn't be put in mansions and hardworking people in shacks. That is exactly the OPPOSITE of what communism wants. In real Communism, everyone lives in basically the same sized house.

And the only reason people try to be the best is to get recognition for it. If you stop giving them attention, they'll just give up and realize that they aren't any better than anyone else.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:44 pm


Miss Murdered
emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.

Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.

Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.

Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop

anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules.
second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole.

Anarchy - You know what I mean.. sweatdrop It just won't work, period.

And Communism - That's not what I mean. The classroom thing was an example of how the system works. I'm not saying people are better than others at all. It's an attempt to please everybody, but it won't work, simply because of the selfish nature of human beings.

the reason a communism would work is that because the people in the communism want it to be a communism and live for the good of the whole. those who want the communism arent selfish.


I agree with that.
And slackers wouldn't be put in mansions and hardworking people in shacks. That is exactly the OPPOSITE of what communism wants. In real Communism, everyone lives in basically the same sized house.

And the only reason people try to be the best is to get recognition for it. If you stop giving them attention, they'll just give up and realize that they aren't any better than anyone else.

exactly. the people that try to be better get treated the same, and they get a reality check and realize that they really arent any better than anyone else.

Large Paddles


johnny foreigner

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:50 pm


emo tazer
Miss Murdered
emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
emo tazer
_cheezlvr4evr_
LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.

Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.

Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.

Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop

anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules.
second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole.

Anarchy - You know what I mean.. sweatdrop It just won't work, period.

And Communism - That's not what I mean. The classroom thing was an example of how the system works. I'm not saying people are better than others at all. It's an attempt to please everybody, but it won't work, simply because of the selfish nature of human beings.

the reason a communism would work is that because the people in the communism want it to be a communism and live for the good of the whole. those who want the communism arent selfish.


I agree with that.
And slackers wouldn't be put in mansions and hardworking people in shacks. That is exactly the OPPOSITE of what communism wants. In real Communism, everyone lives in basically the same sized house.

And the only reason people try to be the best is to get recognition for it. If you stop giving them attention, they'll just give up and realize that they aren't any better than anyone else.

exactly. the people that try to be better get treated the same, and they get a reality check and realize that they really arent any better than anyone else.


And there isn't NO private property. You can have clothes, food, pets, crap, etc. Just none of this "MY HOUSE IS BIGGER THAN YOUR HOUSE" crap that goes on, especially where I live.
PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:54 pm


yeah. no one is trying to out do each other. everyones public ownings (hausses, office rooms and buildings, and other crap like that) are equal. not stuff like personal belongings. i mean, equal has to be within reason.

Large Paddles


johnny foreigner

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:11 pm


emo tazer
yeah. no one is trying to out do each other. everyones public ownings (hausses, office rooms and buildings, and other crap like that) are equal. not stuff like personal belongings. i mean, equal has to be within reason.


And lawyers won't be bloodsuckers because they'll actually love their work. We won't really need that many, either. And you won't win money from court cases, so that'll keep people from suing for no reason.
PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 12:55 am


exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .

Large Paddles


johnny foreigner

PostPosted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 8:56 am


emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Clearly because doing things for the good of other people is evil and you go to hell for such a sin.

Haha. At least that's the way I think of it.
PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 7:40 am


emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Because I don't know a single person who cleans toilets or takes away garbage bags because it's a job they love doing.

IceintheInk


John.D.W.

PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 5:34 pm


IceintheInk
emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Because I don't know a single person who cleans toilets or takes away garbage bags because it's a job they love doing.


hahaha nice.
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 4:41 pm


IceintheInk
emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Because I don't know a single person who cleans toilets or takes away garbage bags because it's a job they love doing.


That's what morbidly obese people are for.

johnny foreigner


Washulove

PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 6:30 pm


Miss Murdered
IceintheInk
emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Because I don't know a single person who cleans toilets or takes away garbage bags because it's a job they love doing.


That's what morbidly obese people are for.

That's too cruel.
Maybe not for my Nationstates country ( twisted ), but still, that's cruel.
If other people can do what they love, why can't morbidly obese people do what they love? They can SO eat for money. Taste-testers, eating contests, couches...

Wait, couches aren't food.
But sometimes, it looks like they ate a couch.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:03 am


Washulove
Miss Murdered
IceintheInk
emo tazer
exactly. everyone would do what they love. everyone is different, so there would be a nice balance of different types of people doing different jobs. and people should do their job and be happy, but do it knowing that they are helping the rest of those in the country as well. i dont know why people think that this is a bad idea . . .


Because I don't know a single person who cleans toilets or takes away garbage bags because it's a job they love doing.


That's what morbidly obese people are for.

That's too cruel.
Maybe not for my Nationstates country ( twisted ), but still, that's cruel.
If other people can do what they love, why can't morbidly obese people do what they love? They can SO eat for money. Taste-testers, eating contests, couches...

Wait, couches aren't food.
But sometimes, it looks like they ate a couch.


eek Well...that was kind of a joke.

johnny foreigner


SatoriValentine

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:01 am


As I can see everything is off point but I do believe that we need a revolution in order to get rid of the riff-raff now a daysIt has been over thrity years since the people were out raged enough to speak out about the cooruption except for a few communities. We all have problems and it would be awesome to have a government that actually cared about the people it governs. Instead of the backers to thier campaigns. I find it awefully funny that the one presidential nominee has almost double the numbers of supporters and backers as any other. So maybe we will actually get the type of president we need in office.
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:23 pm


tonismommy
As I can see everything is off point but I do believe that we need a revolution in order to get rid of the riff-raff now a daysIt has been over thrity years since the people were out raged enough to speak out about the cooruption except for a few communities. We all have problems and it would be awesome to have a government that actually cared about the people it governs. Instead of the backers to thier campaigns. I find it awefully funny that the one presidential nominee has almost double the numbers of supporters and backers as any other. So maybe we will actually get the type of president we need in office.


We're not going to have a revolution. People don't act up because nobody else acts up. The few people who do do it for attention so they can be in Nickelback music videos. Most people are thirteen to seventeen year old people who just b***h about it online and put no thought into what they're actually saying. There are a few people on here that I really admire because they say what they think, but then there are a few who kill it for everyone else by copying and pasting their opinion from BushSucks.com and pretending they know what they're talking about.

That makes me sad. I personally wouldn't mind a revolution but there are too many different opinions on how this country should be run. It's too big. We need to divide and conquer. May the majority prevail, even if they aren't communist.

johnny foreigner


razzledazzle5160
Crew

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:29 am


Miss Murdered


We're not going to have a revolution. People don't act up because nobody else acts up. The few people who do do it for attention so they can be in Nickelback music videos. Most people are thirteen to seventeen year old people who just b***h about it online and put no thought into what they're actually saying. There are a few people on here that I really admire because they say what they think, but then there are a few who kill it for everyone else by copying and pasting their opinion from BushSucks.com and pretending they know what they're talking about.

That makes me sad. I personally wouldn't mind a revolution but there are too many different opinions on how this country should be run. It's too big. We need to divide and conquer. May the majority prevail, even if they aren't communist.


Well I also believe that the people on the internet who want to do something and who actually care like you, me, and a lot of other people in this guild are too young to do much. I've sent emails to various causes and have gotten a reply here and there, but does anyone really listen to a 15-year-old? I'm supposed to be unruley and not know what I'm talking about...according to many adults. The thing is I do care and everyone I know well knows my intentions for after school. I want to go out and see the world and help who I can by joining different organizations. I want to just go out and do as much as I can do and be remembered for what I did, not what I didn't do.

Some of us do care, and we get many more added to our small group by watching the Nickelback video. If it takes a music video to get people to understand, then hell why not? It took an entire band to get me to understand. I do believe some people are looking for attention and that is what they'll do, but I don't believe that's everyone.
Reply
Political Discussion (lol internet warfare.)

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum