|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:25 pm
DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso? JKR didn't like the way Alfonso made the film to be? hum... Ok. Last I read last year sometime was that Alfonso was scheduled to direct the next one. But that may have changed. EDIT: Mike Newell is the director. Do you know any movies that he has directed in the past? Ok. Me neither. I just googled him and he directed 'Mona Lisa Smile' and 'Four Weddings and a Funural'
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:29 pm
DarkAngel65 DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso? JKR didn't like the way Alfonso made the film to be? hum... Ok. Last I read last year sometime was that Alfonso was scheduled to direct the next one. But that may have changed. EDIT: Mike Newell is the director. Do you know any movies that he has directed in the past? Ok. Me neither. I just googled him and he directed 'Mona Lisa Smile' and 'Four Weddings and a Funural'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:36 pm
KimCL DarkAngel65 DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 KimCL DarkAngel65 Although I do agree with your points, something to consider is the fact that each book covers a full year, and it is hard to get all of that into a two hour movie. To get everything in its entire detain you would be sitting through a 12 hour movie. Although I did not love the movies, I liked them and I think that the two directors (Chris Columbus, Alfonso) did a good job with what they had. Yes, he did. I thought that the 4th one was also going to be directed by Alfonso? JKR didn't like the way Alfonso made the film to be? hum... Ok. Last I read last year sometime was that Alfonso was scheduled to direct the next one. But that may have changed. EDIT: Mike Newell is the director. Do you know any movies that he has directed in the past? Ok. Me neither. I just googled him and he directed 'Mona Lisa Smile' and 'Four Weddings and a Funural' I haven't seen the second one but I did see Mona Lisa Smile and I liked it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 4:41 pm
Well thats good maybe he's not so bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 5:57 pm
Suposibly Mike Newell is a true "artist" with his movies. Or so I hear. I hope that is ture, because the Harry Potter movies need true imagination to truly live. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:28 pm
I'm glad you agree.
But it's also hard, because every artist has a different view or idea in their imagination, so we will never get the hogwarts that we hold in our hearts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:30 pm
Yeah that's true. I'm sure when were like 80 they'll start making them again and they'l be so high tech we'll like the old ones better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:37 pm
I wouldn't be surprised, I think the Harry Potter books will be famous for generations. They have gotten kids to love reading, and I am sure kids won't stop loving them.
And yes, then we'll be all, "Classics are the best" whent the kids go, "AW MAN look how much the CG sucked in that one, it looks so fake."
xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:43 pm
n_n
I am a fan of the books. And most fans hate the movies because they aren't as good. I agree they are no where near as good, but I still love the movies regardless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:45 pm
Yeah I love the books, the movies are ok too, it's really not there fault anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 6:55 pm
Yes. Time limits and growing children stop them from taking more time and getting everything in there. *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:00 pm
Oh yes, I just hope they can keep some of the same actors into the rest of the movies, though I think they wont be able too. It would be wierd seeing a different Harry Potter and the gang.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Conversationalist
|
Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2005 7:57 pm
It was weird enough changing Dumbledore because Richard Harris died. Imagine if they changed Harry? *Shudders* Not something I would enjoy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
