|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 5:04 pm
xalisae I moved from an F state (Arkansas), to a D state (Colorado). sad I still like Colorado though. "I just want to thank you so much for giving my preferred state of residence, Arkansas, an F in your website's "Who Decides" feature. I am a little disappointed that my current state of residence only recieved a D rating, however. I'm certain that if we try just a little harder, perhaps some day we might be able to protect all the unborn children in America. Oh well, I suppose a girl can dream now, can't she. Sincerely, A well-educated, atheist, feminist pro-lifer" They'll most likely think the last part of that is a farce-lie XD THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PRO-LIFE ATHIEST FEMINIST WHO IS WELL EDUCATED!!!LOLLERSKATES!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:24 am
Tiger of the Fire xalisae I moved from an F state (Arkansas), to a D state (Colorado). sad I still like Colorado though. "I just want to thank you so much for giving my preferred state of residence, Arkansas, an F in your website's "Who Decides" feature. I am a little disappointed that my current state of residence only recieved a D rating, however. I'm certain that if we try just a little harder, perhaps some day we might be able to protect all the unborn children in America. Oh well, I suppose a girl can dream now, can't she. Sincerely, A well-educated, atheist, feminist pro-lifer" They'll most likely think the last part of that is a farce-lie XD THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A PRO-LIFE ATHIEST FEMINIST WHO IS WELL EDUCATED!!!LOLLERSKATES! Sadly enough, yeah. If I registered with NOW, I might as well put "Bigfoot" or "The Tooth Fairy" on my application, as far as they're concerned. That's part of the reason I'd never sign up with them. I think as soon as they found out I considered myself a moderate conservative (oh noes, a filthy Republican in our midst! *hiss*) though, they'd lynch me. Or maybe I'd just defy their logic to the extent their heads would explode. >: ) I need to start looking for some sort of non-partisan, non-religiously affiliated pro-life group here in CO that's at least a decent trek from my home.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:38 am
Or the "Person Fairy" ninja
There are plenty of those online. They have the Athiests for Life, which i thik is the most promenent one...but I'm not sure of any others that are non-riligious are not non-political. If all else fails, you could try and start a group for yourself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:58 pm
I.Am Yeah, still doesn't make it right when Pro-Choicers do it. Not to mention this is a publication, not an individual. They should have some professional courtesy. But, even though there are some annoying Pro-Lifers who say "baby killers and murderers," the vast majority of Pro-Choicers call us Anti-Choice. I mean, it's even on that site and on PP, I believe. Well, their position is called pro-choice, and you're against the pro-choice political stance...so anti-choice makes sense linguistically. But it's all used as propoganda, ofcourse. Doesn't make it any less false of an analogy though. So, his spite is misguided. er...okay, I'll bite. Quote: If we were to say that our perfectly healthy puppy or kitten was a financial burden, and so we were going to put it down instead of putting it up for adoption, people would look at us like we were crazy. Fine, some people would look at you like you were crazy. This would not make up the entire populace of pro-choicers, however. In fact, I only know that one crazy girl who came in here a while back and wouldn't shut up about animal rights + pro-choice...it was quite rude. Quote: But most importantly, why are you posting here? I could've sworn that Pro-Choicers were only supposed to post in the Pro-Life/Pro-Choice Discussion subforum. I'm just facillitating discussion, I mean no harm. Both positions have good points.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:23 pm
[]Himura Kenshin[] I.Am Yeah, still doesn't make it right when Pro-Choicers do it. Not to mention this is a publication, not an individual. They should have some professional courtesy. But, even though there are some annoying Pro-Lifers who say "baby killers and murderers," the vast majority of Pro-Choicers call us Anti-Choice. I mean, it's even on that site and on PP, I believe. Well, their position is called pro-choice, and you're against the pro-choice political stance...so anti-choice makes sense linguistically. But it's all used as propoganda, ofcourse. Doesn't make it any less false of an analogy though. So, his spite is misguided. er...okay, I'll bite. Quote: If we were to say that our perfectly healthy puppy or kitten was a financial burden, and so we were going to put it down instead of putting it up for adoption, people would look at us like we were crazy. Fine, some people would look at you like you were crazy. This would not make up the entire populace of pro-choicers, however. In fact, I only know that one crazy girl who came in here a while back and wouldn't shut up about animal rights + pro-choice...it was quite rude. Quote: But most importantly, why are you posting here? I could've sworn that Pro-Choicers were only supposed to post in the Pro-Life/Pro-Choice Discussion subforum. I'm just facillitating discussion, I mean no harm. Both positions have good points. Arguments aside, though I want an explination on why it is a flase analogy, you shouldn't be posting here, through the rules, and that I'd like to keep you in the guild. It is up to the Mods though, and you have been asked to not do so as well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:52 pm
He's been banned Kaiser. HMiranda has informed the mods that all choicers seen postign in the main forum are to be removed form the guild on sight. I'm sorry, but thems the brakes... sad
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:07 pm
Tiger of the Fire He's been banned Kaiser. HMiranda has informed the mods that all choicers seen postign in the main forum are to be removed form the guild on sight. I'm sorry, but thems the brakes... sad BUT I WANTED TO BE PROVEN WRONG *tantrum*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 10:24 pm
Master Kaiser Tiger of the Fire He's been banned Kaiser. HMiranda has informed the mods that all choicers seen postign in the main forum are to be removed form the guild on sight. I'm sorry, but thems the brakes... sad BUT I WANTED TO BE PROVEN WRONG *tantrum* And I wanted to be the one to ban him! I never get to ban anyone! sad Regardless, yeah. It doesn't matter if you mean harm or not, Kenshin. This is the Pro-Life forum, and it has been decided that Pro-Choicers are only to post in the Pro-Life/Pro-Choice subforum so that people who don't want to talk to Pro-Choicers because this is their comfort zone or whatever other reason, don't have to. And you were told explicitly that if you posted again you would be banned. But in response to your post: Would it then make linguistic sense for me to start calling all Pro-Choicers Anti-Life? Simply because I am Pro-Life and the opposite of Pro-Life would be Anti-Life? That's some really good logic there. Misguided or not, this is the Pro-Life guild. No one in the Pro-Choice guild complains when Pro-Choicers make completely erroneous statements in spite or sheer hatred, so why should it bother us that a Pro-Lifer said something in frustration that doesn't make total sense? The modifier "some" did not come before "people" in my statement. Almost everyone would look at you like you were crazy if you decided to put a perfectly healthy and adoptable puppy down instead of finding a new owner. And the people who wouldn't would be even crazier, so let's not talk about them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 12:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 3:36 pm
I wish he would at least credit me for finding this, going through each state, manually typing in which state got which grades, etc.
But no. Just use my list without the credit of where it was found.
If you live in a state like mine, which did it's homework too well, write to your government. Maybe they'll be so distracted with letters, they'll forget to do their jobs and get fired.
The Norwegian Caucus (yes, there is a Norwegian Caucus) will rise and take power.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:09 pm
Hey haven't been here in a while, but oh well. Nice to be back I suppose.
My question is..... the have abortion on demand in all fifty states. WHAT THE HELL ELSE DO THEY WANT? Seriously, if anyone is to believe any of the bullshit that they put foward about "abortion being horrible but necessary", then why are they doing everything to make it just as acceptable as pregnancy. Well actually I asked a question for which I already knew the answer. They lie, pure and simple. And for what? The oldest reason in the book, money. So they can line thier filthy pockets with the blood money that they suck in from scared and troubled women. Promising to solve all their problems with a "quick and simple procedure", which in actuality leaves the vast majority of them scarred permanently.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:49 pm
so is the american way. have a pill, have a valium, sleep, forget, take the easy way out no matter what.
although convenience is nice, it gets out of hand when we start taking lives for it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:38 am
karllikespies Hey haven't been here in a while, but oh well. Nice to be back I suppose. My question is..... the have abortion on demand in all fifty states. WHAT THE HELL ELSE DO THEY WANT? Seriously, if anyone is to believe any of the bullshit that they put foward about "abortion being horrible but necessary", then why are they doing everything to make it just as acceptable as pregnancy. Well actually I asked a question for which I already knew the answer. They lie, pure and simple. And for what? The oldest reason in the book, money. So they can line thier filthy pockets with the blood money that they suck in from scared and troubled women. Promising to solve all their problems with a "quick and simple procedure", which in actuality leaves the vast majority of them scarred permanently. NARAL doesn't say it's horrible but necessary. They say it's necessary and a very good experience, actually, because it leaves women with a sense of relief. To them there is no baby, so how can it be horrible? It's just a medical procedure.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:33 pm
lyme your aboslutely right..... I got NARAL confused with pro-choice politicians for a second.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:26 pm
that would thus make them pro-abortion. not pro-choice. they don't like choice, they prefer abortion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|