Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Knowledge Forum
Psychology: Are we really using our minds ? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Poll added by [XxGuardianDevilxX]
  Don't forget to add polls in your topics =P
View Results

[XxGuardianDevilxX]

PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 9:30 am


forsakenkae
BUMP ninja

Consider yourself Warned

~[XxGuardianDevilxX]
Damn shout border isn't working stressed .
Next time you post random spam like that, I'm deleting it on the spot [unless it's in the Spam forum sweatdrop ]
My posts look so plain without it gonk .
PostPosted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:21 pm


For as of now,
We know that we do not use the fullest amount of the human mind.
And I would have to agree with you,
In the first post.
I do believe that people can use what they can use,
But what they can't use,
Is unusable for the exact reason why it's unusable.
Which I would love to know.

Reptiliac


ms.celestial

PostPosted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:15 pm


people haven't yet discovered the full extent of the human mind.
PostPosted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:20 pm


wow, i never even heard of this theory before. but i agree with it to a certain extent. we couldn't possible use so little of our brains, what about the little things. surly, we discover or use more of our brains over time...

that's only my opinion, i have no facts to prove it.

midnight-mystic-dragon


Exodus1

PostPosted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 2:17 pm


In PET (not CAT) scans of the brain, which are used to track or find disease through the use of a radioactive substance called cyclotron, it shows all areas of the brain active and keep in mind that you're are conscious during such a procedure. This led me to believe how much of our minds we use, and we may not use all of it, since some are better at academics (left brained) than those who exceed in the arts (right brained). There are always those who can fit in both categories and use both sides but maybe not to the full extension. Perhaps when we are asleep the imaginative parts of our minds, which we can access whenever during the day or not, is able to think up something and run with it. Our subconscious mind maybe? There are also the parts of our brain, we have to remember, that take care of our organs and keep them running. Our brains tell them to do these jobs without our willing them to do so, thankfully keeping us alive through the night. We even use different parts of our brains during different activities, such as when we're watching TV, or playing a sport. They all use different parts. That's my theory. I'm always open to others. The unconscious part of the brain is an idea that intrigues me.
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:23 am


I'm going to refer to a cartoon to explain this. On Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends, Goo can't create things while awake anymore...
But when she was asleep, she made Nut Mcnutty Nut Nut aliens!
Pointing to the fact that subconscious and unconscious > conscious.
And if you think we use our full capacity, we don't.
If we did, we'd be dead right now.

Daunter


aromli

PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:35 am


Wow, I spent the longest time thinking this theory was already proven. I mean, it has been known for some time now that the size of our brain does not mean anything about how smart we are, but if we used the full extent of our brains, don't you think it would have at least SOME effect?

There are hundreds of memories, also, that you might not even know are in your mind, yet when you hear the tune to that song you listened to so much when you were five, you feel like somehow it is familiar. Your mind tells you that you've heard it before, but the actual memories that you stored are a little too far back in the subconscious mind to bring to your immediate thoughts. To sum it up in a confusing manner: You know you know more than you know. If you can have memories that you are not able to fully access because they are too far submerged within the subconscious, it would make perfect sense that there is more to the subcoscious than you actually continue to use.
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:55 am


Pretty much no, we aren't using most of our minds. It is stated that we use less than 5% if I am right (Sorry if I am wrong). Now if we were using most of our minds, we would come to the point where we possibly could control energy, thus matter. Normally translated as "telepathy".

As stated already, our dreams or a "mix" of ideas and thoughts.

We haven't uncovered our mind's potential. Only time and more research and tell but science isn't as powerful as we think.

Neko Tory


Smab

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:16 pm


Well we only use 90% of our brains.

But anyways I don't think brain=mind. But using the iceberg thing I think we use out tip of the mind persay with everyday stuff that doesn't require much like the morning routine that we could do blindfolded [if it wasn't for my weird drift to the left or the sidewalk being tilted I could walk home from my school with my eyes closed] or even that really simple stuff you get occasionally at school.
The middle bit I think we use for more complex stuff or when you're sitting around pondering stuff.
And I deepest part I think we use only when we're really thinking hard at something or those times when you're sitting around pondering life and you actually come to an interesting conclusion, but I think the deepest part comes into play more than that, I think that the deepest part is responsible for those times when something really weird happens and your mind is like "wtf what happened there?!" and it tries to figure it out in the back of your mind while you're going about your life. Or when you have those little unintentional reasons for stuff like you're carrying a grudge and you forget about something
PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:43 pm


[Midori Asuka]
Hmm.
Well, to start, I guess it is safe to say that every day we use our minds and intellect to determine many things, ideas, and other things as such.
This is coming from our conscious mind... The mind that we use all of the time that we are active at day and/or at night.
...
Unfortunately, we do not use our minds to the fullest.
A Literture author, whose name I cannot remember for this topic, is saying that our minds are actually like an iceberg:

- The Conscious Mind (Above surface part of iceberg-- 20%): The mind that we all actively and/or interactively use.
- The Subconscious Mind (Sea level or surface part of iceberg-- 5%): The mind that is not considered to be unactive but is used in your mind. [For example-- The first word that comes to mind when I say "love". You subconsciously think of that word first along with and no other one.]
- The Unconscious Mind (Iceberg that is underwater-- 75%): The mind that inactive and is likely to be stored the majority of the intelligence and knowlegde that has not been discovered or found.

I believe in this because there is so much potential in everything... and like at least one person in your life has said, "You have so much potential" or "You are actually smart; you just do not show it"... or something along those lines.

I really think there is not too much expression or mental use in the world anyway because of the "unawaken" unconscious mind of ours, but that really depends on what your thoughts are and what you believe.

Really, in actuality and reality, this "Iceberg Theory" is saying that we spend our whole lives not tapping into our unconscious minds.

This is how much we do not spend our lives living it to its fullest and greatest potential...

Tell me what you think; I believe in this theory...

How about you all ?



Actually this is true.

Most humans are to stupid to tap into their brains.

[Teenage_Logic]


[Teenage_Logic]

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:51 pm


Exodus1
In PET (not CAT) scans of the brain, which are used to track or find disease through the use of a radioactive substance called cyclotron, it shows all areas of the brain active and keep in mind that you're are conscious during such a procedure. This led me to believe how much of our minds we use, and we may not use all of it, since some are better at academics (left brained) than those who exceed in the arts (right brained). There are always those who can fit in both categories and use both sides but maybe not to the full extension. Perhaps when we are asleep the imaginative parts of our minds, which we can access whenever during the day or not, is able to think up something and run with it. Our subconscious mind maybe? There are also the parts of our brain, we have to remember, that take care of our organs and keep them running. Our brains tell them to do these jobs without our willing them to do so, thankfully keeping us alive through the night. We even use different parts of our brains during different activities, such as when we're watching TV, or playing a sport. They all use different parts. That's my theory. I'm always open to others. The unconscious part of the brain is an idea that intrigues me.



I think there is more to the mind then any scans or physcology can truly explain.

I also believe the body is no more than a vehicle.
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:18 am


As far as I know... The idea that we only actively use a small percentage of our brains was disproven long ago. We evolved bigger brains because bigger brains=smarter=more food=more successful breeding. At the same time, though, those brains put great strain on our pelvises and killed many, many women in childbirth.

There's absolutely no reason to waste valuable energy and human life to create brain matter which doesn't function.

Sylphi


Sylphi

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:22 am


aromli
Wow, I spent the longest time thinking this theory was already proven. I mean, it has been known for some time now that the size of our brain does not mean anything about how smart we are, but if we used the full extent of our brains, don't you think it would have at least SOME effect?


So you're saying that the difference in intelligence between a mouse and a human has nothing to do with the fact that our brain is massively larger than its brain?

Sorry, but no. While to my knowledge cranial capacity is not correlated with intelligence on the micro level (I.e. people with small heads are not stupider than people with big heads,) it is on the macro level, i.e. big-brained humans are smarter than smaller-brained chimpanzees are smarter than tiny-brained lemurs.
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:24 am


Exodus1
In PET (not CAT) scans of the brain, which are used to track or find disease through the use of a radioactive substance called cyclotron, it shows all areas of the brain active and keep in mind that you're are conscious during such a procedure. This led me to believe how much of our minds we use, and we may not use all of it, since some are better at academics (left brained) than those who exceed in the arts (right brained). There are always those who can fit in both categories and use both sides but maybe not to the full extension. Perhaps when we are asleep the imaginative parts of our minds, which we can access whenever during the day or not, is able to think up something and run with it. Our subconscious mind maybe? There are also the parts of our brain, we have to remember, that take care of our organs and keep them running. Our brains tell them to do these jobs without our willing them to do so, thankfully keeping us alive through the night. We even use different parts of our brains during different activities, such as when we're watching TV, or playing a sport. They all use different parts. That's my theory. I'm always open to others. The unconscious part of the brain is an idea that intrigues me.


People who are better at one type of activity than another type of activity tend to have more brain tissue or development in the particular area of the brain which controls that activity.


My mother, to draw an example of this in reverse, is particularly bad at social situations. And a recent brain-scan found small holes in her temporal lobes, which control social interactions.

Sylphi


Aqua_Chica

PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 9:51 am


Sylphi
aromli
Wow, I spent the longest time thinking this theory was already proven. I mean, it has been known for some time now that the size of our brain does not mean anything about how smart we are, but if we used the full extent of our brains, don't you think it would have at least SOME effect?


So you're saying that the difference in intelligence between a mouse and a human has nothing to do with the fact that our brain is massively larger than its brain?

Sorry, but no. While to my knowledge cranial capacity is not correlated with intelligence on the micro level (I.e. people with small heads are not stupider than people with big heads,) it is on the macro level, i.e. big-brained humans are smarter than smaller-brained chimpanzees are smarter than tiny-brained lemurs.
Well I heard that it is the amount of wrinkles you have on your brain that determines how smart you are.
Reply
Knowledge Forum

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 4 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum