|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:16 pm
Nihilistic_Impact You'll remeber that Iucundatis was wounded from that attack. There is blood leaking between the joints in his armour. It's just that blood isn't that important for him. The will to do something is, that's why he's so diffcult to kill. Think Black Knight. Also, I'm not the one saying I can blow things up in my hand without fear of harm. I just have an absurdly powerful, strength/endurance wise, character. Strength and endurance don't really come in when running through explosives...Explain how "the will to do something" is a justifyable response.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:16 pm
So from this entire thread we've come to the conclusion:
- Inc kicks, and gets his leg/armor ******** up.
- Ho explodes, and is apparently immune to both damage from it and being physically moved by the blast.
- Inc, however, is not immune to being physically moved by explosions.
- Thusly, Inc is physically moved by the explosion regardless of how much damage the armor negated.
The rest of your argument is... well... an argument. ******** with your differences in character or dislike of each other for as long as you'd like, but I believe the discussion is ended.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:18 pm
I'll go edit my last post to state movement of the leg then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:18 pm
So...this would essentially mean my intial jump went through and N_I gets a repost?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:22 pm
I don't care how you handle it.
Apparently Impact is editing to state leg movement; you go after that then, or something. If there's a post already, edit, if there's not one, post... you know the drill, eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:24 pm
Even said explosion which happened after the leg was kicked out would not stop the mace from its swing as both attacks were launched one after the other.
Iucundatis' mobility is limited now unless he wants a broken leg. Which will ******** him over even if it doesn't stop him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:26 pm
Nihilistic_Impact Even said explosion which happened after the leg was kicked out would not stop the mace from its swing as both attacks were launched one after the other. Iucundatis' mobility is limited now unless he wants a broken leg. Which will ******** him over even if it doesn't stop him.
Also, I still have doubts that an explosion occuring on your leg wouldn't hinder that attack in any way...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:28 pm
Need I quote myself from earlier? Quote: The right hand was just the same as should be expected, normal, armoured, and massive. In its grasp was a weapon that looked like a mace, a field crackled and ionized the air about it as though a beast raged inside of it; and one did. It was a mighty weapon, fueled by the essence of a daemon to give it destructive powers like none other; but that was only half of it, as the weapon was pattern upon an ancient torture device known as a pear. Inserted orally, virginally, or rectally, or any other opening within the victim; and it would spring open, tearing the wound open even more and causing wider destruction then before as spikes drove forth from the inside to ravage the internals. Another weapon of holiness perverted by a foul man, the Crozius. He clipped it to his belt to shake your hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:30 pm
Nihilistic_Impact Need I quote myself from earlier?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:31 pm
Nihilistic_Impact He clipped it to his belt to shake your hand. And it was removed when...mid run? Without even a hint of motion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:33 pm
Yes, it was stated in the post it came into play that as he came foward his tentacles gripped it and swung it back and around for an overhead strike. Tearing it from the clasp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:36 pm
Nihilistic_Impact Yes, it was stated in the post it came into play that as he came foward his tentacles gripped it and swung it back and around for an overhead strike. Tearing it from the clasp. I am aware it was in the post you first posted the attack, I am saying that in order to set up an attack like that (aka one occuring "not even a full second" later) you have to hint that your gripping the weapon...and you had one post between your kick and making the attack to do so, but you did not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:39 pm
No, not at all. Someone can pull a gun in a post and fire it too, all in the same post. The second refers to the time lasp between the kick landing and the mace blow. It doesn't refer to how quickly the mace was drawn and swung.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:41 pm
Nihilistic_Impact No, not at all. Someone can pull a gun in a post and fire it too, all in the same post. The second refers to the time lasp between the kick landing and the mace blow. It doesn't refer to how quickly the mace was drawn and swung.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:43 pm
Look, even with your "eye blinking" which somehow slows down perception there are still things you can't percieve. You were too concerned with producing an explosion to block the kick and looking for a place to jump to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
