|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:13 pm
La Veuve Zin divineseraph yeah, that's why if i have a girlfriend who can't go without sex, i'll do oral. i don't want it in return though. Why can't all guys be like you?! Seriously!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:25 pm
better question- why are all of the girls who wants a guy like me either taken or hundreds of miles away? crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:02 pm
Long distance relationships aren't as bad as you may think, Seraph. If anything, they encourage some vital factors in a relationship. Trust, respect, love, patience . . .
If it's really love, distance won't be an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:07 pm
divineseraph better question- why are all of the girls who wants a guy like me either taken or hundreds of miles away? crying Ditto! stressed Personally, the idea of someone performing fellatio on me has always disturbed me. neutral Maybe I'm a little too sympathetic, but I know -I- wouldn't want to stick that in my mouth, so I really don't think I could enjoy it knowing that she had to stick it in her mouth. Just seems so demeaning. ...Anyways. xp I'm not going to worry about contributing to the argument, because everyone else who's replied has pretty much said what I would say. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:11 pm
Yumatuu Serrono Um..... I just want to state why I disagree, and from what the guilds welcome thing or whatever, it looked like it said it's ok if you say your reasons for disagreeing, but if this is wrong, please tell, I don't want to break the rule, and I want to be as polite, as possible. I feel it is ok fo arbortion to happen because the baby has no mind, as in general information that the baby has stored in its brain. Also, if two teenagers were to say, have "For-Fun" sex, and they're useing a condom, and the condom were to fail, and the female gets pregent, you're just going to say that it's a horrible thing to do abortion, it souds like, because then, even though it's not their fault, they're just going to have to deal with conseqences, difficulties, money problems, when they're not ready? That's like bringing a child into the world, just to have a miserable life, and is that what you want to happen? I bet not, but some people just do sex like that, and that'll never change, also, I don't think that the baby in the mother will ever feel pain as such when it's still young in the womb. Overall, I think that abortion is ok. Thank for your time, and consideration to this post. Do you think we're prudes who don't know "ZOMG people have sex!" A lot of us are having sex too. The difference is, no one in here is killing to have recreational sex. Why? Because it's not NECESSARY to kill to have recreational sex. Bottom line, if you can't deal with a situation without killing another human, don't put yourself in a situation where you're going to have to. I'm not flaming or trying to be critical, I'm just being honest. I also have a tiny little thing that was bugging me about it. I'm offended by the implication that women can't handle taking responsibility for their actions without killing another human. What sort of feminist spirit is that? "Oh noes! I had sex but didn't know I could get pregnant from it! Someone help me! I need a surgery or else my life is over!" I'm tired of being told that women as a whole need to kill their children to be able to have sex outside of marriage. Screw that! Why can't we have sex outside of marriage without having to cover it up with abortions in able to keep our jobs and stay in school? If a man gets a woman pregnant, he scored. If a woman gets pregnant, she's a slut. This view needs to change. Covering it up with abortion isn't the solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:17 pm
I shall now bear all three of your children, Kate!
I love you and your serious pwnage skills.
heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:33 pm
Ebony the Peacian Vampire I shall now bear all three of your children, Kate!
I love you and your serious pwnage skills.
heart -All- three?? You mean there's not any left for me?? crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:34 pm
*scratches Kate off checklist and happily smiles at the site of her huge-a** belly that defies all scientific logic*
You're next, Andeh! : D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:38 pm
Ebony the Peacian Vampire *scratches Kate off checklist and happily smiles at the site of her huge-a** belly that defies all scientific logic*
You're next, Andeh! : D : D But isn't that illegal? Then again, Kate impregnating you goes against not only the laws of man, but the laws of nature, so I guess that breaking the laws of man in my case isn't so bad. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:48 pm
Hey, I said you're next! I never said I'd have your babies now!
XD
But yes! We shall dominate the world with our amazing ability to be literally bisexual! >: D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:49 pm
Besides, if you have four babies at once, you'd have to abort one of them to fit the statistic!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:46 am
Yumatuu Serrono I.Am If you are going to insist upon posting in the Pro-Life guild, could you at least have the decency to consider what our opinions are? Don't go in there and tell us that abortions "only kill underdeveloped unimportant blobs," when, as Pro-Lifers, we obviously believe differently. Just because the guild is public is not an invitation for people to come in and start bashing our beliefs. You are abusing the situation, and making it more likely that kp decides to make the guild private again. Yumatuu Serrono If you had read my post clearly, you would have read that I am not trying to be rude! I have also read other peoples opions, and I have gathered enough information to state my opions and all I want to do is see what other people think of my ideas so that I may have a full idea of the situation! I am not "bashing" your ideas, only stateing my opions, and gathering information! Please be a bite more polite next time! I also did not say that the babies inside the mother's womb are 'unimportant" or "blobs" those are your own words, to some people, their babies are very important, i'm just backing up the people who do abortion from the people who think that abortion is wrong. Also, thank you for reading my post, but I don't thank you for flamming upon me. Good day. I do not want to have another conversation like this, as I said, I only want to hear what other people have to say to this, and I don't want any flameing, I only want to gather information upon this topic. Please don't debate this here (want to debate then p.m. me) But you did say you want to here what others have to say 1. Not true, babies do have brians (or that won't be alive) an you were once one too and I still don't see how it justifies abortion. 2. Personally I think teens shouldn't have sex cause of all the unwanted pregnancies and std's. And their at fault even if they used condoms since it was by choice and to kill them just for ones pleasure is beyond selfish to me. If they can't handle,Well lets just say that's what adoption (and they could be very happy, you don't know if they will or not) is for and I think it's possible for it to feel pain (it's not a zygote or just cells no more at that point, it's devolping). I don't hate sex but I don't think they should encourge young people since they can't seem to handle the possible emotional and physical out come or they get so into a relationship they stop using condoms (they need to learn about birth control then). If the relationship is only about sex an can't have fun without it then don't seem like they have much going for them (never tried oral sex, not sure I want to.....) The only time I agree with abortion is life and death situations where they know for sure (not just a possiblity cause all pregnancies have possibly of complications) that the mother or child will die. I might not get one in a situation like that but I can understand then at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:42 am
lymelady La Veuve Zin divineseraph yeah, that's why if i have a girlfriend who can't go without sex, i'll do oral. i don't want it in return though. Why can't all guys be like you?! Seriously! I would just like to go on record saying i'm like that. I'm taken, but i'm like that. You girls do realize you can so no right? and if he makes a big deal about it, you're practically obligated to kick him in the nuts for the benefit of all mankind. wahmbulance wahmbulance WARNING THE FOLLOWING COMMENT IS RATED P FOR PRACTICALLY ******** PORNO!!! wahmbulance wahmbulance i also don't mind if the girl dosn't like me putting my... um... discharge in her mouth. Hell the thought makes me wanna puke, and, to be honest, i don't really wanna kiss a girl after she's done that. Not until after she brushes her teeth or rinses with listerine or something. She can definatly feel free to grab a sock or something, or spit, or whatever. I mean, the other stuff definatly feels better, but man, i can definatly understand if she does not want to finish the evening with a mouthfull of happy juice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 6:46 am
lymelady Yumatuu Serrono Um..... I just want to state why I disagree, and from what the guilds welcome thing or whatever, it looked like it said it's ok if you say your reasons for disagreeing, but if this is wrong, please tell, I don't want to break the rule, and I want to be as polite, as possible. I feel it is ok fo arbortion to happen because the baby has no mind, as in general information that the baby has stored in its brain. Also, if two teenagers were to say, have "For-Fun" sex, and they're useing a condom, and the condom were to fail, and the female gets pregent, you're just going to say that it's a horrible thing to do abortion, it souds like, because then, even though it's not their fault, they're just going to have to deal with conseqences, difficulties, money problems, when they're not ready? That's like bringing a child into the world, just to have a miserable life, and is that what you want to happen? I bet not, but some people just do sex like that, and that'll never change, also, I don't think that the baby in the mother will ever feel pain as such when it's still young in the womb. Overall, I think that abortion is ok. Thank for your time, and consideration to this post. Do you think we're prudes who don't know "ZOMG people have sex!" A lot of us are having sex too. The difference is, no one in here is killing to have recreational sex. Why? Because it's not NECESSARY to kill to have recreational sex. Bottom line, if you can't deal with a situation without killing another human, don't put yourself in a situation where you're going to have to. I'm not flaming or trying to be critical, I'm just being honest. I also have a tiny little thing that was bugging me about it. I'm offended by the implication that women can't handle taking responsibility for their actions without killing another human. What sort of feminist spirit is that? "Oh noes! I had sex but didn't know I could get pregnant from it! Someone help me! I need a surgery or else my life is over!" I'm tired of being told that women as a whole need to kill their children to be able to have sex outside of marriage. Screw that! Why can't we have sex outside of marriage without having to cover it up with abortions in able to keep our jobs and stay in school? If a man gets a woman pregnant, he scored. If a woman gets pregnant, she's a slut. This view needs to change. Covering it up with abortion isn't the solution. well, one thing that would help is if they had a slut word for men and put the same kind of negetive effort toward them if they had a reputation of sleeping around. After all, that's what a slut is, someone who just ******** all over the place. I think it's kind of a good thing that society looks down on that kind of behavior, but it should cut both ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:15 am
So, wait, let me get this straight. You think abortion is justified because the feti can not think for himself? I wish to know why this is justified. Because it can not object? Since when was that ever moral? Its a useless clumb of cells? If its so useless then why do reseraches think they need it? Why do they want to harvest the stem cells? Or create a fertalised egg for genetic testing? Why, also, do the cells them sleves seem to diferentiate into what they will be later in life on or moments after conception? That clump of useless cells isn't so useless it would seem. (I'd liek to add that if you remove the word "useless" and just leave "clump of cells" that this argument falls fla on its face when you remmeber back to biology class when we are tought we ar emade up entirly of cells. IE, we never stop being a clumb of cells. Argument=fail)
And what if two people want to have fun-sex? That exempts them form responcibility how? They didn't agree to pregnancy. I see. When some one agrees to stabbing some one else, they agreed to the knife penetratign there flesh, but not to potentionaly being caught or a jail sentence. When a little boy takes a cookie form the tray when he's not supposed to, he agree to the tackign of the cookie, not the potential slap on the hand. Why, i ask, when we make desitions that have potential out comes, must we hold these people responcible, but when a woman decides she's going to have sex (knowing full well what sex can lead to) is she not held responcibal for the pregnancy? What you have just told me is that it is okay to be irrispncibal. That she can go out and preform the act but not have to own up to the out come of that act.
She's poor, depressed, etc. So then why the hell is she doing somethign that could potentialy make her situation worse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
