|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:28 pm
i never noticed any of them
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:35 am
theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 1:30 pm
DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:20 am
Potter351 DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:01 pm
DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies yeah the ratio between read harry potter books number of songs towers over how many times ive seen the movies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:46 am
Potter351 DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies yeah the ratio between read harry potter books number of songs towers over how many times ive seen the movies ya thats about it, I'll read every book then watch one movie, then do it again all over again, haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 12:24 pm
DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies yeah the ratio between read harry potter books number of songs towers over how many times ive seen the movies ya thats about it, I'll read every book then watch one movie, then do it again all over again, haha ya but im like read them all 2 straight through then watch a movie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:51 pm
Potter351 DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf theres alot when you read the books over and over again, haha I need to get new books me too ive read them all together probably more than 100 times haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies yeah the ratio between read harry potter books number of songs towers over how many times ive seen the movies ya thats about it, I'll read every book then watch one movie, then do it again all over again, haha ya but im like read them all 2 straight through then watch a movie yep I'll be watching azkaban soon and by the time I'm finished the books again goblet of fire should be in the theaters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 5:42 pm
DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf Potter351 DrgnSmurf haha ya I need to get new books, if I'm not reading harry potter I'm watching the movies yeah the ratio between read harry potter books number of songs towers over how many times ive seen the movies ya thats about it, I'll read every book then watch one movie, then do it again all over again, haha ya but im like read them all 2 straight through then watch a movie yep I'll be watching azkaban soon and by the time I'm finished the books again goblet of fire should be in the theaters it takes you that long to read
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:25 am
In the movie Harry Potter and the goblet of fire Voldemort calls lily a muggle but she is a muggleborn. Or if you want to be that way 'mudblood'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:42 am
"At the end of the fourth book it says the carraiges are still horseless... when in reality, at that time, Harry should be able to see the thestrals because that was after Diggory died.
Please ignore my horrid spelling... "
The theory behind this is that in order to see the thestrals, the death must sink in and be accepted by the witness. Luna and Neville had both already had time to think about and accept the deaths that allowed them to see the thestrals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:23 pm
I may be wrong ,but oh well. In the first book Hagrid said that Lily and James Potter were head boy and girl. But (I forgot which book) Lupin said that he was a prefect, that meaning that James couldn't have been a prefect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:30 pm
DrgnSmurf Akilan DrgnSmurf Goblet of Fire book
page 503
aguring about crouch going missing
'dumbledore come' said crouch(suppose to be fudge)angrily Mine says the right thing. whee And you must have the soft cover because mine is on page 580. no mines hard cover Mine also says Fudge, and it's hardcover. It's page 580. Page 503 is Ron and Hermione berating Harry for staying to save all the hostages at the bottom of the lake in the second task.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 3:36 pm
Diaga-chan jessiekitten The Fluff At the end of the fourth book it says the carraiges are still horseless... when in reality, at that time, Harry should be able to see the thestrals because that was after Diggory died.
Please ignore my horrid spelling...  i agree with you. Harry should have been able to see the horses then. *shrugs* JKRowlings makes up her mind about how the books go not us.
perhaps you have to actually see the person die/be killed to see the thestrals? when harry and diggory were at the grave yard, harry's was facing the ground, and was blinded by pain. he didn't actually see diggory get killed, only heard what was going on around him...
but that's just me...No because when he came back the next year he could see them and he hadnt seen anyone die over the summer, so that can't be it. It's probably just an oversight. NO writer ever notices and remembers every little thing. Not only that, perhaps at first when she wrote about it, she actually meant for them to be enchanted, horseless carriges. Then , while writing the fifth book, she got the idea for it. I mean, she's not writing them all at once, and she's not clearly not thinking ahead much while writing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:42 pm
Ok, I'm just saying this from memory, so I have no idea if it's true or not, my copy of SS fell to peices years ago and I've been waiting for DH so I could have the whole set in hard cover.
If i recall correctly (not that I'm saying I do, I could be very very wrong), crabbe and goyle are introduced on the train, and they aren't first years. I think they might have been third years... but i'm not sure. I'm probably wrong, but i have this constant thought that they were in a different year than harry and draco... if i'm right, then j.k. forgot this in later books, because they seem to be in the same year as the others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
