|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:48 pm
kage no neko I got the impression it bit me (but I didn't feel teeth or anything). Like the coldness surrounded and hurt and then I saw a spark and a shock went up my finger. And he agrees, he doesn't blame it for biting me, lol. No, I'm not sure it's coming from him, but I found a book link thing that says cold blobs in the aura could be caused by different issues in life, so it could be. He just feels the cold spot on him and says it feels nice. Lmao. Well, If it's not hurting anybody, I don't see any reason to question it any further. It sounds seemly harmless.
Though, I would watch it just incase it turns out to be one of those things that feed off energy and possably tearing holes in the aura or doing some sort of damage. It could be anything.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 7:06 pm
You're right. It could be. Which is why I am wondering if it is appropriate to issue such warnings when it hasn't harmed the guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:01 am
I didn't get the impression it's mean or anything, just trying to figure out what it is, lol.
But if you say it can be anything, it's okay. Thanks anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:08 pm
TeaDidikai You're right. It could be. Which is why I am wondering if it is appropriate to issue such warnings when it hasn't harmed the guy. Better safe then sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:10 pm
Unless so called "safe" leads to very sorry. confused
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:14 pm
TeaDidikai Unless so called "safe" leads to very sorry. confused How would just simply keeping an eye on it be dangerous?
gonk
It doesn't seem to care being watch, Just opposed to being poked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:18 pm
Namikikyo How would just simply keeping an eye on it be dangerous? gonk It doesn't seem to care being watch, Just opposed to being poked. I admit I'm overly cautious. Here's the thing. The realm of what it could be is limitless. The realm of what it likely is however, is limited. If it is an unconscious thoughtform generated by the young man, supporting ideas that it could be potentially harmful without justification can turn such things into Mr. Darks really quickly. That said, if it is a thoughtform, it can easily be turned back by reconstructing it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:31 pm
So better to suggest it's okay then to suggest it could be dangerous and have it possibly unconsciously become so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 12:36 pm
TeaDidikai Namikikyo How would just simply keeping an eye on it be dangerous? gonk It doesn't seem to care being watch, Just opposed to being poked. I admit I'm overly cautious. Here's the thing. The realm of what it could be is limitless. The realm of what it likely is however, is limited. If it is an unconscious thoughtform generated by the young man, supporting ideas that it could be potentially harmful without justification can turn such things into Mr. Darks really quickly. That said, if it is a thoughtform, it can easily be turned back by reconstructing it. I understand.
Though, The idea of thoughtforms and how they work is a bit foreign to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 1:32 pm
kage no neko So better to suggest it's okay then to suggest it could be dangerous and have it possibly unconsciously become so? It's better not to assume. Namikikyo I understand. Though, The idea of thoughtforms and how they work is a bit foreign to me. No worries. I know I'm overly cautious. I wouldn't have mentioned it had it not been going that way. I just have a deep disdain for Mr. Darks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:16 am
Okay I've been hearing a lot about generational curses and how YHVH covenant is technically one of them. I've seen the verses in Exodus explaining this but I don't see why YHVH covenant would be classified as such. Why is it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:46 am
A Mr. Dark is short for a Mr. Dark story. The origins of the term 'Mr. Dark Story' are form ISCABBS in the 1980s-90s. I believe it actually originated with a story where the antagonist was named Mr. Dark, but that story predated me being around. By the time I was active in Religion and Morality> it was a term used for the very common experience of a new pagan suddenly being a warrior of light against the forces of darkness/angels/etc.... This is very common, even today. There are a few threads made by people in Mr. Dark Stories claiming a demon is inhabiting someone, or there's a rift in reality, or something like that. The danger is that often people will want to do unethical things because of these beliefs, which are themselves most likely false. I know of at least one case where someone was physically imprisoned and almost injured due to a Mr. Dark Story his 'friends' were caught up in that had him as a possessed antagonist. I've been in the periphery of several. Mr. Dark Stories are distinct from people who think spells are the answer to everything, but the individuals often overlap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:11 pm
rmcdra Okay I've been hearing a lot about generational curses and how YHVH covenant is technically one of them. I've seen the verses in Exodus explaining this but I don't see why YHVH covenant would be classified as such. Why is it? Okay, let's examine this. The most common verses are present in Exodus 20:5; 34:7; Numbers 14:18; Deuteronomy 5:9. Another verse is present within Deuteronomy 23:2-3. Exd 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me; Exd 34:7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation]. Numbers 14:18 is a recollection of the Exodus verses, and Deuteronomy 5:9 is a recount of the initial exchange in Exodus. Basically, YHVH entered a covenant with his Chosen People. Those who converted to the Abrahamic Faiths share in that covenant as the extension of his Chosen People. Those who reject their role within the covenant are cursed by YHVH and are so for the generations that indulge those broken oaths, because they continue the actions of their fore bearers (Deuteronomy 24:16) Within Deuteronomy 23:2, there is a generational curse against those born outside of wedlock and one dedicated to specific nations in verse 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:18 pm
TeaDidikai rmcdra Okay I've been hearing a lot about generational curses and how YHVH covenant is technically one of them. I've seen the verses in Exodus explaining this but I don't see why YHVH covenant would be classified as such. Why is it? Okay, let's examine this. The most common verses are present in Exodus 20:5; 34:7; Numbers 14:18; Deuteronomy 5:9. Another verse is present within Deuteronomy 23:2-3. Exd 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God [am] a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth [generation] of them that hate me; [quote="Exd 34:7]Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear [the guilty]; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children's children, unto the third and to the fourth [generation]. Numbers 14:18 is a recollection of the Exodus verses, and Deuteronomy 5:9 is a recount of the initial exchange in Exodus. Basically, YHVH entered a covenant with his Chosen People. Those who converted to the Abrahamic Faiths share in that covenant as the extension of his Chosen People. Those who reject their role within the covenant are cursed by YHVH and are so for the generations that indulge those broken oaths, because they continue the actions of their fore bearers (Deuteronomy 24:16) Within Deuteronomy 23:2, there is a generational curse against those born outside of wedlock and one dedicated to specific nations in verse 3. Is there a possibility this curse is still going on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
