|
|
| Sick of... |
| Pro-choicers in general. |
|
17% |
[ 13 ] |
| Pro-choice arguments. |
|
19% |
[ 15 ] |
| Pro-choice ideology. |
|
25% |
[ 19 ] |
| life in general. |
|
15% |
[ 12 ] |
| no respect whatsoever. |
|
22% |
[ 17 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:40 pm
Lady__Miko honestly, it's always been in my opinion that a woman is violating the integrity of her own body by perversing it's natural functions to abort. I think one of the things that disturbs me most is how rooted choicers can be, and some don't even stop to think how value based and opinionated they're reasons are, and more or less that there is another way to look at concepts like murder, babies, or integrity. What constitutes bodily integrity? Do I have to agree with what a choicer deems that answer to be? Personally a lot of my opinion has to do with not only the fact that pregnancy is a natural female function, but my religion has made the inability to carry children a curse. Hence I see it as the body's integrity being violated. Exactly, that's what I say. The womb is a place meant to be safe, and meant to protect you as you grow until you are able to survive on your own. But no, apparently that's not what it's for. According to the Pro-Choicer I used that argument on, the womb is also for regulating hormones, so it doesn't matter if you violate the other function, its "bodily integrity" is preserved. rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:22 pm
Wizoh wizah whazah!?
This thing is back up O.o!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:35 pm
Lady__Miko What constitutes bodily integrity? Do I have to agree with what a choicer deems that answer to be? If Mipsy ever breathes on me, I'm going to spaz and shriek about how she's violating my bodily integrity and now she must die. AND ARE YOU GOING TO DENY A WOMAN HER RIGHT TO DEFEND HER BODILY INTEGRITY!?!?!?!?11//!/11/11?2 scream Ah, that felt good. *basks in the sweet, sweet snark* cool
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:46 pm
La Veuve Zin Lady__Miko What constitutes bodily integrity? Do I have to agree with what a choicer deems that answer to be? If Mipsy ever breathes on me, I'm going to spaz and shriek about how she's violating my bodily integrity and now she must die. AND ARE YOU GOING TO DENY A WOMAN HER RIGHT TO DEFEND HER BODILY INTEGRITY!?!?!?!?11//!/11/11?2 scream Ah, that felt good. *basks in the sweet, sweet snark* cool *snicker* I felt a warm smile fill my heart when I read that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 9:33 am
I.Am Lady__Miko honestly, it's always been in my opinion that a woman is violating the integrity of her own body by perversing it's natural functions to abort. I think one of the things that disturbs me most is how rooted choicers can be, and some don't even stop to think how value based and opinionated they're reasons are, and more or less that there is another way to look at concepts like murder, babies, or integrity. What constitutes bodily integrity? Do I have to agree with what a choicer deems that answer to be? Personally a lot of my opinion has to do with not only the fact that pregnancy is a natural female function, but my religion has made the inability to carry children a curse. Hence I see it as the body's integrity being violated. Exactly, that's what I say. The womb is a place meant to be safe, and meant to protect you as you grow until you are able to survive on your own. But no, apparently that's not what it's for. According to the Pro-Choicer I used that argument on, the womb is also for regulating hormones, so it doesn't matter if you violate the other function, its "bodily integrity" is preserved. rolleyes I fail to see how that makes ANY sense. As long as you pervert ANY function, the integrity of the body is being comprimised because you are altering it's ability to function as it normally would under a particular circunmstance. Why are they picking and choosing confused
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 11:22 am
Lady__Miko I.Am Lady__Miko honestly, it's always been in my opinion that a woman is violating the integrity of her own body by perversing it's natural functions to abort. I think one of the things that disturbs me most is how rooted choicers can be, and some don't even stop to think how value based and opinionated they're reasons are, and more or less that there is another way to look at concepts like murder, babies, or integrity. What constitutes bodily integrity? Do I have to agree with what a choicer deems that answer to be? Personally a lot of my opinion has to do with not only the fact that pregnancy is a natural female function, but my religion has made the inability to carry children a curse. Hence I see it as the body's integrity being violated. Exactly, that's what I say. The womb is a place meant to be safe, and meant to protect you as you grow until you are able to survive on your own. But no, apparently that's not what it's for. According to the Pro-Choicer I used that argument on, the womb is also for regulating hormones, so it doesn't matter if you violate the other function, its "bodily integrity" is preserved. rolleyes I fail to see how that makes ANY sense. As long as you pervert ANY function, the integrity of the body is being comprimised because you are altering it's ability to function as it normally would under a particular circunmstance. Why are they picking and choosing confused Because if they admitted that they'd have to give up their "right."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:15 pm
Master Kaiser Wizoh wizah whazah!? This thing is back up O.o! I needed to smurf.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:34 pm
lymelady Master Kaiser Wizoh wizah whazah!? This thing is back up O.o! I needed to smurf. BIZITCH YOU DIZZON'T BUMP UP MAH THREAD TA SMURF! YOU BETTA SUPA SMURF OUT TEH IZZ-A TA SMURFALURF!! Its the hair I swear!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:45 am
Master Kaiser BIZITCH YOU DIZZON'T BUMP UP MAH THREAD TA SMURF! YOU BETTA SUPA SMURF OUT TEH IZZ-A TA SMURFALURF!! Its the hair I swear! No, I think it's something in the water. Have you been catching and eating large amounts of fish? Or perhaps felting hats?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:36 am
La Veuve Zin Master Kaiser BIZITCH YOU DIZZON'T BUMP UP MAH THREAD TA SMURF! YOU BETTA SUPA SMURF OUT TEH IZZ-A TA SMURFALURF!! Its the hair I swear! No, I think it's something in the water. Have you been catching and eating large amounts of fish? Or perhaps felting hats? DUBA TEE EEF? HELZ NA, I IZ SUPA FINZILE TO TEH RINIZAL!! DUN BE HATIN!?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:06 am
COuld be one of those cute little japanese highschool girls ( ninja Yes, this refrence, believe it or not, is connected to Zin in some way)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:24 am
Tiger of the Fire COuld be one of those cute little japanese highschool girls ( ninja Yes, this refrence, believe it or not, is connected to Zin in some way) stare I am not little, nor Japanese, nor in high school. So I'm going to chalk this one up to another bout of paranoia. I shall translate Kaiser's sudden aphasia. "TUBA TEETH? HELENA, IS SUPPER FINALLY TO THE RENAL! DONE BEE HATING?" I'm changing my diagnosis from mercury poisoning to emo-hair induced brain damage.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:16 am
La Veuve Zin Tiger of the Fire COuld be one of those cute little japanese highschool girls ( ninja Yes, this refrence, believe it or not, is connected to Zin in some way) stare I am not little, nor Japanese, nor in high school. So I'm going to chalk this one up to another bout of paranoia. I shall translate Kaiser's sudden aphasia. "TUBA TEETH? HELENA, IS SUPPER FINALLY TO THE RENAL! DONE BEE HATING?" I'm changing my diagnosis from mercury poisoning to emo-hair induced brain damage. XD close close Here is it actually: DUBA TEE EEF? HELZ NA, I IZ SUPA FINZILE TO TEH RINIZAL!! DUN BE HATIN!? Wtf? Hell no, I am super fine to the rine. Don't be hating.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:03 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:59 am
Well yes, I am getting brain damage from the emo-style of hair I have now. So excuse my lack of grip and undestanding of my whiteness.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|