|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 12:24 pm
Nopenname Nikolita Yeah, he wasn't too bad. I was flipping between Dr. Phil and Maury (new teen wanna-be-mommy episode). Dr. Phil did seem to be more in the face of the woman who was so against breastfeeding in public, and that was kinda amusing to watch. He was more in her face, and I thought he should have brought this up, simply because her arguement boiled down to the fact that it wasn't "attractive", which she said multiple times. It wasn't based on some sense of prudish modesty or religious or anything like that, she simply kept saying "it's not attractive, it's not attractive." Which I mean COME ON. If your strongest arguement is that it's not pleasing to look at, well we can't lock up ugly fat people based on that arguement. I do think it's kinda interesting that if the sliver of breast shown while breast feeding (which they SHOWED on the Dr. Phil show multiple times) is PC enough for television without blurring or editing, then I'd like to say it's safe for public consumption. I noticed that too. She said it was "not attractive" to breastfeed, or whatever, and I was sitting next to my couch friend saying "...what the hell? neutral " I mean, as you said, a lot of things aren't attractive. Really obese people aren't attractive. Stuck up snobs who think they know everything aren't attractive. The bathrooms I clean up at work aren't attractive. Get over it, lady. The world isn't going to conform to your likes and dislikes, just because you can't see a breast as a tool in which to feed a baby. rolleyes Did anybody see the part of the episode in which they had the debate of whether or not to have condoms freely available in school? I saw a bit of it, and agreed that they should have them provided.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2005 2:11 pm
I watched the whole episode. 3nodding I'm just interested in all the issues so it kept me there for an hour.
People tend to take such extremist opinions that it's hard to know whether to laugh or be angry because it makes them sound so ridiculous. Anyone who thinks that schools hand out condoms willy-nilly with the lunch seriously needs a reality check.
Seriously, I agree that they should be given out as part of a comprehensive sex education regiment which is proven to reduce teen pregnancy and STD rates. I'd like to know what study the...ahem...lady [ROFL] who said the studies show otherwise was quoting. Because abstinence-only education has never been shown to work in the US. But apparently it did in Uganda. -finger twirl- Totally different game there, lady. And when I went through sex-ed at least, they covered abstinence in there as well, it's not like it's just forgotten and thrown out the window.
EDIT: Yeah, back to the BF topic, he was more interested in getting a real answer from "oh it's not attractive at all," woman then being upset with the mother who doesn't feel she has to cover up. Because at least she could articulate how she felt rather then avoiding the real question.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:34 am
Pirate Dirge Seriously, I agree that they should be given out as part of a comprehensive sex education regiment which is proven to reduce teen pregnancy and STD rates. I'd like to know what study the...ahem...lady [ROFL] who said the studies show otherwise was quoting. Because abstinence-only education has never been shown to work in the US. But apparently it did in Uganda. -finger twirl- Totally different game there, lady. And when I went through sex-ed at least, they covered abstinence in there as well, it's not like it's just forgotten and thrown out the window.I noticed that too. Just because an abstinence-only program worked in Uganda, in no way means it will work in the US, or even in Canada. Completely different circumstances and lifestyles that make the two countries non-comparable, in my opinion. I've seen several articles in magazines like Cosmo, and on TV, that have shown how poorly abstinence-only programs have failed. I don't remember what I was taught in high school, only the bit on STD's. I know I took some sort of Family Studies class in grade 9 that was basically a review of everything I had already taught myself (finished with 9% or 96% in the class at the end of the semester), but I don't remember anything being taught about abstinence-only. Part of the reason why my guild exists is because so many people don't know the information they should know, even by high school.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:05 am
From a recent study of the southern states (considering they are BIG on the ab-only programs):
... For example, AIDS cases rose 27 percent for six Southern states - Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana - between 2000 and 2002. Whetten said such cases only rose by 11 percent during the same period in the entire Midwest.
A separate study found that North Carolina AIDS rates increased by 36 percent between 2001 and 2003.
"These six states are in a lot of trouble," Whetten said. "You're better off being born in Costa Rica or some South American countries than in Durham, N.C."
In addition, the nation's highest rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea remain in Southeastern states, many of which are plagued with high poverty levels, poor health care resources and low levels of health insurance coverage. ...
-Sun Herald, Mississippi
The reason for the rise in STDs is Ab-only programs make them sign contracts saying they won't have intercourse, however do not explain that STDs are passed orally/anally as well. So tons of GIRLS are performing oral sex/a**l sex and thinking that they are not breaking their "contract" meanwhile spreading disease around like rhesus monkies. Further the study found that girls who DECIDED to have intercourse were 65 percent less likely to use condoms over half of them stating feeling guilty for breaking the contract.
However, A program in Philadelphia that has young women practice condom use and roleplay negotiations for safe sex has shown measurable improvements in the rate of STDs in an at risk population:
... One year later, girls in the skills-based program were less likely than their peers to have an STD; about 10 percent tested positive, versus 18 percent in the general-health program and 15 percent in the STD-information program.
They also reported fewer instances of unprotected sex than girls in either of the other groups, and were less likely to say they'd had multiple sexual partners in the past 3 months.
There were, however, no clear differences between the groups at an earlier time point, 3 and 6 months after the classes. The apparent "delayed effect" of the skills-based program, Jemmott and his colleagues note, may indicate that it's hard for girls to start safer-sex practices in their existing relationships. Instead, they may be better able to use what they've learned at the beginning of a new relationship.
Though past studies have found that teenagers in STD-prevention programs report changes in their sexual behavior afterward, this study -- by actually screening for STDs -- helps confirm that the changes are real, according to the researchers. ... -May 2005
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:39 am
Nopenname you might remember this information, since you posted in this thread in my guild... anyways, to everyone else, this information is part of a magazine article that I typed up for my guild. I think it was either Cosmo or SELF magazine. Anyways, it was about birth control availability becoming reduced in the US because now pharmacists can refuse to fill a prescription based on their own religious/personal beliefs, or something like that. Part of the article also touched upon abstinence being taught in schools, and how it wasn't working because the administration is providing faulty information.
~
They're Teaching What?!
None of the major abstinence-only education curricula funded by the federal government (to the tune of $170 million in 2005) provides information on choosing or using a birth control method. What they do provide: misleading - sometimes downright inaccurate - information about preventing pregnancy and STD's.
What's Taught: "Imperfections in the contraception not visible to the eye could allow sperm, [STD's] or HIV to pass through." What's True: According to the CDC, latex condoms provide an essentially impermeable barrier to particles the size of STD pathogens.
What's Taught: "Contraception, technology's despairing answer to adolescent sexual activity, has intensified the loneliness, frustration and emptiness of our young people." What's True: Several studies suggest young women who don't use birth control are more likely to have poor mental health, including depression, anxiety, and low self-esteem.
What's Taught: "The chemical forms of birth control damage the inside of a young girl's body, in ways that can affect her fertility later on." What's True: The Pill does not cause any damage that leads to infertility, says medical texts, and may lower the risk for pelvic inflammatory disease, a fertility threat.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:28 am
Argh! I have this new guild member I was sort of hesitant to let join, but now I am considering banning her. This is some of the BS she is posting: Quote: It is my personal belief that the female orgasm is superior to the male orgasm, and that we are even superior in sex. The female clitoris has more nerve ending than the male glands. Infact twice as many. We have multiple orgasms without fatiuge and without pause. We have multiple types of orgasms aswell. And more areas on our body are sensitive. A man only has one type of orgasm, only one orgasm, and only 8 seconds of pleasure. While females have a variety of different orgasms, pleasures, and can have so many more, some lasting fourty seconds, and the shortest usualy being 15 seconds. Male orgasms are crued and primitve in comparison and are dull and mundane in comparison as well. And then after I replied to that post and contradicted her on a couple of points, this was her reply: Quote: Longest ever recorded is ten seconds. Most men have one orgasm and then need to break. They have less nerves, and their brains don't have as much grey matter, meaning they don't think as much as us. With a inferior brain and glands its easy to suggest that their orgasms in comparison to our own are primitive and crude. If a female were to experience a male orgasm I think she would be quite disapointed, and if a male experienced a female orgasm I think he would actualy be in pain from the intensity. They react as though it seems so good because they don't know any better, and are to underdeveloped to know any better. neutral I have asked her to tone it down, because I am a bit upset with her, and I know there are going to be guild members who will be upset with her if she continues to talk that way. I did send her a warning by PM, so I'll check Gaia after class later tonight to see if she's said anything back. In your guys' opinion, should I just ban her outright, or should I give her another chance (which is what I've already done)?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:55 am
If she's disrupting your community and won't make an effort to get off her high-horse, you may have to ban her, but that's really your call. I wouldn't want someone who goes out of their way to shove down half the gender either. Personally, she sounds like a femi-nazi to me and I hate them just as much as chauvenists. Too stupid to know any better....riiiight. rolleyes
Just go with your gut on it: your guild, your call.
[ ninja It's not true that men can't have multiples anyway. ninja ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:15 am
Pirate Dirge If she's disrupting your community and won't make an effort to get off her high-horse, you may have to ban her, but that's really your call. I wouldn't want someone who goes out of their way to shove down half the gender either. Personally, she sounds like a femi-nazi to me and I hate them just as much as chauvenists. Too stupid to know any better....riiiight. rolleyes
Just go with your gut on it: your guild, your call.
[ ninja It's not true that men can't have multiples anyway. ninja ] Thanks, sorry. heart No one has replied to any of her posts but me, but I will be out at school until late tonight, so I will be keeping an eye on the guild on my break. I posted the warning in the thread, and I PM'ed her the same warning, so she knows she can't do it again or else she'll be banned. She is a feminist, which I think she mentioned in her request to join form (being all for women's rights, or something like that), which I don't mind - what bothers me is she's going out of her way to degrade the opposite gender, for no reason. I mean sure, say the woman's clitoris has twice as many nerve endings as the head of a man's p***s - that still doesn't make his orgasms or anything less powerful or special. And yeah, I did post and tell her that men can have more than one orgasm. 3nodding I used to make my ex orgasm back to back sometimes, and it was fun to watch. He'd be so out of it afterwards because he'd be so drained. xd
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:59 pm
If that's what she thinks about men, she's never met my husband. Izzy has had multiple internal orgasms before having the shooty kind. And even after that he's still going strong. She just hasn't slept with the right guy yet. lol.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:09 pm
Illiana_Galean If that's what she thinks about men, she's never met my husband. Izzy has had multiple internal orgasms before having the shooty kind. And even after that he's still going strong. She just hasn't slept with the right guy yet. lol. That's what I was thinking. I think I said in my reply post to her, something about her not having slept with anyone/with the right person yet, otherwise she'd know, and wouldn't be spouting off this supposedly fact-based BS. She hasn't PM'ed me back, so I'm just keeping an eye on her.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 5:10 pm
Never mind, she's PM'ed me back and wants to find a less offensive way to get her point across. I don't know if it can be done, but we'll try. Thanks for the support, and sorry for taking up yet more space in the sticky. blaugh
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 9:34 am
Hmm, I "HOPE" my kids will abstain from sex until they are married, but just because they won't doesn't mean I want them getting condoms w/o my knowledge. As their parent I have to sign a form saying they can take asprin, yet they can hand out condom w/o my knowledge? It's just an odd oxymoron in my eyes. How many sexually active teens are actually going and getting their annual gyno exams done? Or doing monthly breast exams? I just feel the need to know that my kid is sexually active and would want to know how they are protecting themselves. I also would ensure they get annual health exams done for their own protection, male or female I just feel handing them outw/o the parent's knowledge opens the door for secracy that shouldn't be in a parent/child relationship and it allows many children to fall through the gaps. If they are going to hand them out...at least inform the parents what is going on.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:32 am
YES, but part of the issue with teens not using protection is that they are too embarrassed to have everyone know about what they're doing and if providing condoms in schools means fewer kids have STDs and unwanted pregnancies, I'm all for it. But you can't depend on the school to tell you what you need to know about your child: you need to work with them and create the relationship you want at home. So if you want your child to be open and you've made it clear that they are safe to tell you whatever they'd like, then it shouldn't be an issue if schools provide condoms or not. Parents provide morals, not schools.
Teens are going to be secretive no matter what you do, but if it's clear to them that they are not safe at home to tell you what they'd like to, they'll withold even more information. All because they don't want to dissappoint a parent or because they don't want to be punished for living life. The ball is in the parent's court on that one.
As for the aspirin analogy--and am I ever sick of that--medications can KILL a child or make them sick, a condom can't. It's a whole different ball game.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:56 am
Parents are usually notified when handing out condoms is part of the sex-education curriculum. However, when they get to college you're SOL as far as getting notification of anything other than a general "parent's calendar" My Freshman year of college, I was 18, Planned Parenthood was in the student lounge near the cafeteria, lady had CRATES of condoms and my husband actually went up and took like 70 of them and she goes "go ahead get more!" and just kept putting them out on the table.
Second, I don't know about where you live, but even in our Targets and Grocery stores condoms are behind the pharmacy counters or locked behind glass, because they are stolen like crazy.
Even I'D be a little embarrassed to tell the pharmacist to please give me the Trojan extra sensitive. I'd do it because I'm a responsible adult, but there's a reason they're stolen so often. Because kids take them instead of buy them.
Further, the asprin thing, well if my kid is coming down with the flu, for one, I certainly don't want ANYONE to be able to give them asprin...as it can KILL them. And that's why medications need WRITTEN permission while condoms may not.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 12:19 pm
Nopenname From a recent study of the southern states (considering they are BIG on the ab-only programs): ... For example, AIDS cases rose 27 percent for six Southern states - Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana - between 2000 and 2002. Whetten said such cases only rose by 11 percent during the same period in the entire Midwest. A separate study found that North Carolina AIDS rates increased by 36 percent between 2001 and 2003. "These six states are in a lot of trouble," Whetten said. "You're better off being born in Costa Rica or some South American countries than in Durham, N.C." In addition, the nation's highest rates of chlamydia and gonorrhea remain in Southeastern states, many of which are plagued with high poverty levels, poor health care resources and low levels of health insurance coverage. ... -Sun Herald, Mississippi This is completely unrelated to your article, but I just wanted to point out that The Sun Herald is my hometown's (Gulfport, MS) newspaper! Yay! I miss that paper sometimes. Man, they'd do huge reports on the stupidest s**t at times. But they did have a pretty decent column called "Sound Off" where people cuold anonymously call in (or email) and rant and rave about local goings-on which was usually pretty humorous!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|