| woodwinds or brass? |
| woodwinds! |
|
58% |
[ 186 ] |
| brass! |
|
34% |
[ 109 ] |
| percussion, im a rebel! |
|
7% |
[ 24 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:55 pm
Wood wings are better cause we are more complicated cause we have more keys and we need more air for out instrements
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:55 pm
WOODY WINDS!!! WHY?
Cause woodwinds rock more then brass, and brass knows it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:59 pm
wood winds kick brass get it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:02 pm
xX-Venom90-Xx Wood wings are better cause we are more complicated cause we have more keys and we need more air for out instrements No....you don't need more air. Trust me you do NOT need more air. And you might have a lot of keys, but each not has it's own key basically. You also don't have to worry (Cept for flutes) about aiming the air just right to get the note perfectly in tune.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:05 pm
yeah we do and yeah we need more air flutes can't go over like 15 second without needing air and there are many notes we have to aim our air
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:37 pm
I'm sorry, but wood winds are great. I have been a sax player for too long to say that they do not rock. They are awesome. Especially alto saxophones. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:06 pm
I'm a Woodwind, but I think Brass is better.
It gives the band balance and volume for the music,
And it's mostly the background to brighten the melody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 4:08 pm
That's true. In my band, we are always told to listen down to the brass, especially tubas.
Lithium Twilight I'm a Woodwind, but I think Brass is better.
It gives the band balance and volume for the music,
And it's mostly the background to brighten the melody.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:53 pm
brass hands down. not that i have anything against woodwinds, just that brass is more powerful than a woodwind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 4:32 pm
Hikari Myst That's true. In my band, we are always told to listen down to the brass, especially tubas. Lithium Twilight I'm a Woodwind, but I think Brass is better.
It gives the band balance and volume for the music,
And it's mostly the background to brighten the melody. Same here.
But, the melody must be heard also,
so that the band would have a more balanced sound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:15 am
Woodwinds! mostly cuz i play clarinet and i am still confused about HOW we can play a brass instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 20, 2010 10:38 am
Brass!
I'm a trumpet player and I am proud. With brass you have to buzz your lips and a clarinet said that the trumpets had it way worse than them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:28 am
hm, i think i'm voting for both of them ~
I'm not a "modern" musician (I'm specialized on Early Music) ... But for what I've heard till now, I see that both woodwinds and brass are very important at a band and at an orchestra.
In my regard, woodwinds (as flutes and clarinets, for example) have the function of adding a kind of "sweetness" to the melody, like making it look softer. On the other hand, I appreciate the tone of strength of the brass section and the fact of supporting all the upper voices. Its a question of harmony !
I love whan there is kind of a dialogue between these two sections - the tenderness and the agressivity - it's contrast it's just awesome ~
oh, and by the way, I'm a flautist xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:47 pm
Well, im a woodwind person. I love playing the saxophone.
Next year, i am learning to play both the tenor sax and the trumpet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
