|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:01 pm
Cabron the Swan I get the idea that some of you are under the impression there was a serial killer in the game; there is not. Just fyi. smile
EDIT: Also, four hours. The arsonist isn't a SK?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:01 pm
Cabron the Swan I get the idea that some of you are under the impression there was a serial killer in the game; there is not. Just fyi. smile
EDIT: Also, four hours. I knew that. I just didn't care to tell them. So now you have nothing Rawk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:01 pm
Medeus Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Uhm, clearly defending myself isn't gonna prove innocence. So why bother? He's right... Unvote. Votes: Medeus: 1 (seph) lol,j/k votes are still Medeus: 2 (Kuzodav, Seph)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:02 pm
Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Nothing was bandwagoned, I was just giving an example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:03 pm
Medeus Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Uhm, clearly defending myself isn't gonna prove innocence. So why bother? I don't understand you. is this another one of your elaborate schemes? You fight when you don't have to, but when your life is on the line.. you just give up. Shouldn't it be the other way around?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:03 pm
The Rawk Hawk Cabron the Swan I get the idea that some of you are under the impression there was a serial killer in the game; there is not. Just fyi. smile
EDIT: Also, four hours. The arsonist isn't a SK? This guild's common version of the Arsonist is a Mafia-side killing role with a 50% chance of backfiring and killing the attacker instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:03 pm
Kuzodav Medeus Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Uhm, clearly defending myself isn't gonna prove innocence. So why bother? He's right... Unvote. Votes: Medeus: 1 (seph) lol,j/k votes are still Medeus: 2 (Kuzodav, Seph) Oh ha ha ha ha, you're so god damn ******** you. stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:04 pm
l-Kathulu-l Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Nothing was bandwagoned, I was just giving an example. Okay. I don't really have a reason for being suspicious of you, but you haven't given me much to work with. Rawk on the other hand....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eloquent Conversationalist
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:04 pm
l-Kathulu-l Kuzodav l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. Right after there was a Discussion about it. Kath, I have my eye on you, but I'm not straying from my target. , that's fair for the game. I just will stay in my own party. Yes, Med is OVERLY protective, yes there is a lot of evidence against him. But there is the but factor, so for now I will remain as Kath. You know, everyone seems to say that. And I'm using the same ratio of 'everyone' that you are. I have my on one person: Kath I have two FoS's: Wolfe Medeus I have one vote: Medeus I didn't realize that only three people were playing this game, b***h.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:04 pm
You'd enjoy that, wouldn't you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:05 pm
Supersephiroth7 Medeus Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Uhm, clearly defending myself isn't gonna prove innocence. So why bother? I don't understand you. is this another one of your elaborate schemes? You fight when you don't have to, but when your life is on the line.. you just give up. Shouldn't it be the other way around? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO ********!? Argue with you more? What else can I add to my defense that I haven't already addressed? Obviously you think I'm guilty, and I find that once you've gotten an Idea in your head, it's pretty hard to convince you of the truth, which I've already tried. Since you're being pig-headed, why the ******** should I waste my time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:07 pm
Allegro You'd enjoy that, wouldn't you? No. No, at this point I would enjoy turning him into This.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:07 pm
Cabron the Swan The Rawk Hawk Cabron the Swan I get the idea that some of you are under the impression there was a serial killer in the game; there is not. Just fyi. smile
EDIT: Also, four hours. The arsonist isn't a SK? This guild's common version of the Arsonist is a Mafia-side killing role with a 50% chance of backfiring and killing the attacker instead. Dammit. :B I had to know what the Arsonist did, so I looked up the roles on the Web, and it said that he was a SK. Well, my SK theory is screwed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:09 pm
Medeus Supersephiroth7 Medeus Supersephiroth7 l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. How was it bandwagoned XD? @ Med: XD I thought you would atleast come up with some kind of defense Uhm, clearly defending myself isn't gonna prove innocence. So why bother? I don't understand you. is this another one of your elaborate schemes? You fight when you don't have to, but when your life is on the line.. you just give up. Shouldn't it be the other way around? WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO DO ********!? Argue with you more? What else can I add to my defense that I haven't already addressed? Obviously you think I'm guilty, and I find that once you've gotten an Idea in your head, it's pretty hard to convince you of the truth, which I've already tried. Since you're being pig-headed, why the ******** should I waste my time? I don't see how I'm pig headed. Like I said before, I go with logic. You haven't tried to reasonable disprove me since I made the accusations. I don't see myself as being pig headed. I actually provided plausible opinions. This seems like a scene from phoenix wright. You were all cool and collective until I starting poking holes. Your fate is sealed. As is mine. The only question is, how is it all going to play out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2011 5:13 pm
Kuzodav l-Kathulu-l Kuzodav l-Kathulu-l Ok, I read all up. I remain neutral. trollface.jpg. I just don't like casting votes and getting FOS'ed for a vote that was just bandwagoned. So for now I'll stay around and put in my two cents and all that. Right after there was a Discussion about it. Kath, I have my eye on you, but I'm not straying from my target. , that's fair for the game. I just will stay in my own party. Yes, Med is OVERLY protective, yes there is a lot of evidence against him. But there is the but factor, so for now I will remain as Kath. You know, everyone seems to say that. And I'm using the same ratio of 'everyone' that you are. I have my on one person: Kath I have two FoS's: Wolfe Medeus I have one vote: Medeus I didn't realize that only three people were playing this game, b***h. I was just saying that you are looking at everyone in the game, in a literal sense. Not, "Oh Kath is being a little suspicious, I have my eye on him." I have no problem if you have suspicion on me. you have provided enough evidence that most (if not all) the players see you as the greatest threat/ally. I just hope to stay on your ally side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
