|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:38 pm
Memo to self: X46-8 Ore Carriers to be used as a newer model of the X46-7 is 175 meters in length, and holds 5000 metric tons of materials with a crew of twenty. The newer model will hold 1 thousand more, is slightly faster, and 180 (?) meters in length.
Super Transport XI holds ten million cubic meters or 25 million metric tons of cargo. Could hold 40,000 standardized containers.
ST VII carries 2.5 million metric tons.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:44 pm
Smart boy.
But you'll never see these ships running around on their own.
Usualy they tavel in armed convoys of 5 ships or more, not including escorts and smaller light freighters who tag along for protection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:41 pm
Cale Darksun stare Edson. You got that from StarDestroyer.Net didnt you? Now, had you been paying attention to any of kenet and stellar magic's battles, you'd see that 1. Boarding is an Effective tactic. Even the threat of boarding kept Kenet on edge. 2. Torpedoes and other warheads are used in Capital Ship Combat. 3. Tactics of maneuver do exist. 4. Fighters are capable of taking the fight to the enemy. Yeah I just went through it....It has lots and lots of flaws neutral so mybe we should just come up with new tactics as we go. xp 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:46 pm
Nelowulf He probably was the professor. That is true, Borill is one of the best leaders I have met so far...same with you Cale. If I was fighting either of you I'd run far far far away.....and die *gulp* good thing your Imperial. *takes sigh of relief*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:02 pm
Cale Darksun Smart boy. But you'll never see these ships running around on their own. Usualy they tavel in armed convoys of 5 ships or more, not including escorts and smaller light freighters who tag along for protection. Has its ups and downs. It'll be easier to track a convoy of ships instead of lone freighters, though they'll be harder to round up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 5:20 pm
But they will be easier to pick off. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:21 pm
ENS. Edson Nelowulf He probably was the professor. That is true, Borill is one of the best leaders I have met so far...same with you Cale. If I was fighting either of you I'd run far far far away.....and die *gulp* good thing your Imperial. *takes sigh of relief* Once you get past his pretty pretty ships, Borill's got nothing. I generally never command any ship larger than a frigate. Anything bigger is too expensive for a pirate to own and up keep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:41 pm
Cale Darksun ENS. Edson Nelowulf He probably was the professor. That is true, Borill is one of the best leaders I have met so far...same with you Cale. If I was fighting either of you I'd run far far far away.....and die *gulp* good thing your Imperial. *takes sigh of relief* Once you get past his pretty pretty ships, Borill's got nothing. I generally never command any ship larger than a frigate. Anything bigger is too expensive for a pirate to own and up keep. Worst he's got is a Revenge, and I've already proven I can take that out in the best of circumstances. He can usually beat me in terms of power, but he's not invincible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:25 pm
Its not power he's beating you in mate.
Its strategy.
Most of the time you're throwing superior numbers at him.
If you just utilize your numbers and work him into a situation you can use those numbers, you'd start ripping his task force appart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:48 pm
I was talking about ship to ship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 5:44 am
Listen, the Imps have always had the best ships.
Even Mon Cal cruisers were barely a match against a Star Destroyer.
You dont need a ship that can compete with his, you just need to better apply your resources at hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:34 am
Cale Darksun Listen, the Imps have always had the best ships. Even Mon Cal cruisers were barely a match against a Star Destroyer. You dont need a ship that can compete with his, you just need to better apply your resources at hand. That is a good example, Mon Cal cruisers used to be civilian ships but they turned them into some of the best battle ships I have ever seen. (wait a minute! if you rip his task force apart........I'm dead. Hmmmmmm I'm getting a transfer out a there!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:15 am
Cale Darksun Listen, the Imps have always had the best ships. Even Mon Cal cruisers were barely a match against a Star Destroyer. You dont need a ship that can compete with his, you just need to better apply your resources at hand. Well, the Hapan's had good ships, last I recalled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:31 am
Bull s**t.
Their turbolaser technology sucks a nut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:42 am
Their Ships were somewhat better than the Imps design-wise, but their turbolaser technology was so far behind that it took three times as long to recycle energy.
Hapans are great battle coordinators, mostly because they couldn't do anything wihtout attacking en masse.
Their fighters are much better than their capital ships though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
