|
|
| Wrong? *read what i wrote first* |
| YES! |
|
65% |
[ 36 ] |
| nope |
|
12% |
[ 7 ] |
| I dunno... |
|
21% |
[ 12 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:38 am
ninja By viewing any of these images, you people have already committed adultery in your hearts (even images that imply sexual excitement and hypnotize you into thinking about them). Porn and Playboy are NOT okay. Quit making excuses. ninja
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:49 pm
@T3h Unholy One: It's all right to call yourself that and yet denounce other people for not being as good a Christian as you?
Anyway, my view on the matter is a pretty simple one. Religions have, throughout all history, told men that lust and sexual desire are wrong. They, just as (to use an over-used example) in 1984 the 'Party' sought to pervert the sexual drive, sought and still seek to debase a primitive drive, and own people's lives through guilt.
However, I don't declaim the churches as doing this on purpose, out of pure evil. It's simply how they have developed over time, and it's the easiest way for them to function.
I'm not a Christian. I have huge amounts of pornogrpahy on my hard drive, yet I have never raped, killed or stolen. I lead a moral life, according to my own standards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 3:52 pm
Zher Cometh The Inquisitor Porn is not forbidden in The Bible. Lust, however, is. is porn forbidden at all? and what exactly is lust? lamen terms please xd and porno causes you to lust....you are meant to treat every woman older than you like your mother and every women younger than you like your sister.(old testament)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:55 am
T3h Unholy 0ne ninja By viewing any of these images, you people have already committed adultery in your hearts (even images that imply sexual excitement and hypnotize you into thinking about them). Porn and Playboy are NOT okay. Quit making excuses. ninja I just saw you in a different guild... wierd And i agree with catgirlsPLZ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:58 am
Cleavage in the form of pics/video/other material is porn. And the point for cleavage is to cause sexual arousal. Yes, making it porn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 12:02 pm
catgirlsPLZ I'm not a Christian. I have huge amounts of pornogrpahy on my hard drive, yet I have never raped, killed or stolen. I lead a moral life, according to my own standards. The emboldened phrase above is where the main problem with your state lies. You see, everyone leads a moral life according to their own standards, otherwise they wouldn't lead that kind of life. Hitler lead a moral life, according to his own standards. Stalin lead a moral life, according to his own standards. Ed Gein lead a moral life, according to his own standards. If personal standards are allwe have to judge morality on, then the world is a sad place indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 12:38 pm
Cometh The Inquisitor catgirlsPLZ I'm not a Christian. I have huge amounts of pornogrpahy on my hard drive, yet I have never raped, killed or stolen. I lead a moral life, according to my own standards. The emboldened phrase above is where the main problem with your state lies. You see, everyone leads a moral life according to their own standards, otherwise they wouldn't lead that kind of life. Hitler lead a moral life, according to his own standards. Stalin lead a moral life, according to his own standards. Ed Gein lead a moral life, according to his own standards. If personal standards are allwe have to judge morality on, then the world is a sad place indeed. True, then I'll change that: according to the standards of society and the law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:51 pm
I wonder if porn is wrong in the eyes of god if you are watching it to have it act as a Aphrodesiac for you and your spouse?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:48 pm
catgirlsPLZ True, then I'll change that: according to the standards of society and the law. Again, hardly a proper source for morality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:24 am
eh, i am not sure on the whole topic, so i will hare my views on that kind of stuff ^^
i plain out think that you should not have sex unless you are in love, married, wanting to have a baby, etc, etc...
people have their own rights and views on this, so please do not flame! heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 3:42 am
Cometh The Inquisitor catgirlsPLZ True, then I'll change that: according to the standards of society and the law. Again, hardly a proper source for morality. With most laws based on Christian morals (in the West), I hardly think it's an improper source. Anyway, some might argue that a book that is in some sections many thousands of years old is hardly the best source for moral teachings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:59 am
dwarfshorty I wonder if porn is wrong in the eyes of god if you are watching it to have it act as a Aphrodesiac for you and your spouse? Only if it's pictures/video/writing/whatever of someone else. A person can make pornographic pictures of their spouse and that is NOT wrong. Lust for someone who is one's husband/wife is NOT wrong. Lust for someone NOT one's husband/wife is ADULTERY, and that IS wrong. Honestly, I try to avoid being around buxom women, as just being near them might cause me to lust. Quote: If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better to go through life with one hand than to have both hands and spend eternity in hell. -Jesus I'm not married, but I guard my heart pretty well. Like the man said, Quote: Take every thought captive. -Jesus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:15 pm
o_O The Face says hi. dwarfshorty I wonder if porn is wrong in the eyes of god if you are watching it to have it act as a Aphrodesiac for you and your spouse? Only if it's pictures/video/writing/whatever of someone else. A person can make pornographic pictures of their spouse and that is NOT wrong. Lust for someone who is one's husband/wife is NOT wrong. Lust for someone NOT one's husband/wife is ADULTERY, and that IS wrong. Honestly, I try to avoid being around buxom women, as just being near them might cause me to lust. Quote: If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better to go through life with one hand than to have both hands and spend eternity in hell. -Jesus I'm not married, but I guard my heart pretty well. Like the man said, Quote: Take every thought captive. -Jesus I think this answers expresses the answer well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:40 pm
either way porn & PLAYBOY is sick sick sick domokun domokun domokun domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:08 pm
mistressofthelost Yeah, yeah, quit trying to find a loop hole so you can watch porn without feeling guilty. Playboy and the like is porn right? Right. And there are only women in Playboy, right? Right. And when the girl is by herself, she can't be having sex, right? Right. Therefore, sex is not needed to make porn. In conclusion, porn is simply sexual pictures or writings that are meant to cause arousal. Not just the viewing of sex. blueprints for the black market...
♥
I completely agree with your definition.
And any sort of that material
Is prettymuch disgusting in itself.
...anberlin
Donate your extra tickets? Them's mighty appretiated!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
