|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 8:25 am
exactly the point. a lack of government causes more problems than good outcomes. naturally, people need leadership and an example to follow. anarchy is impossible because of this fact. when there is anarchy, people will start a revolution, creating a givernment.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:39 am
No you have the wrong idea. If people revolt for no government, there will be no government.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:23 pm
i dont think that anarchy would work out...too many people would want one end of the spectrum, while others would want the other end. there would be no one to regulate and wars and insaneness would break out. i could see a lot of crime and death...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:19 pm
John.D.W. No you have the wrong idea. If people revolt for no government, there will be no government. anarchy isnts necessarily a revolt for no government, rather than a very weak government, or the sprout of a new government or country. with this in mind, people would want to start a government, ending the anarchic period.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:50 pm
LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.
Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.
Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.
Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:29 pm
_cheezlvr4evr_ LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.
Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.
Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.
Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules. second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:09 am
Cynical Rainbows Remember this: Anarchy is not a government, but a lack of thereof. That's like saying your religion is Atheist. XD Anarchy= Lack of Government Atheism = Lack of Religion You get the idea. Is it bad that I HAVE always considered my religion to be atheist? O.o I agree with everything said about anarchy. It would be a nice idea, but.. yeah.. we're all too sick and petty for that. Nothing would change, anyway. Thats why they're called revolutions.. they come around again and nothing changes.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:29 am
You all have a very good point about the anarchy. It is a government ....wow i just confused myself. O.O'
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:28 pm
alrighty, lets clear some things up.
anarchy: cannot be a government, for it is lack of government. it cannot exist. the human race is mad. the human race is sick. the human race is stupid. when an anarchy is in existance, humans start a revolution. we need an example to follow. not everyone is mature enough, or even smart enough to govern themselves thier own way.
athiest: i guess it isnt horrible to say that your religion is athiest, but, like anarchy being lack of government, athiest is lack of religion. being athiest is not bad. i cant fully say i support it, for i do belive in a god, but i understand where athiests are coming from, and i respect that. but so, athiest technically isnt a religion, but lack thereof.
when i say that the human race is stupid, i am not trying to single anyone out. it is just a fact. humans are stupid, and we will never change. people can say that we have technology, and opposable thumbs, and the most complex brains, or whatever. but we are stupid. fact of life here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:42 pm
emo tazer alrighty, lets clear some things up.anarchy: cannot be a government, for it is lack of government. it cannot exist. the human race is mad. the human race is sick. the human race is stupid. when an anarchy is in existance, humans start a revolution. we need an example to follow. not everyone is mature enough, or even smart enough to govern themselves thier own way. athiest: i guess it isnt horrible to say that your religion is athiest, but, like anarchy being lack of government, athiest is lack of religion. being athiest is not bad. i cant fully say i support it, for i do belive in a god, but i understand where athiests are coming from, and i respect that. but so, athiest technically isnt a religion, but lack thereof. when i say that the human race is stupid, i am not trying to single anyone out. it is just a fact. humans are stupid, and we will never change. people can say that we have technology, and opposable thumbs, and the most complex brains, or whatever. but we are stupid. fact of life here. very true. Almost 50% of people are complete dumbasses.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 3:21 pm
I agree.
It's that old saying, really. A PERSON can be smart, rational and caring. PEOPLE as a whole are stupid, insane and self-obsessed.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:09 pm
IceintheInk I agree. It's that old saying, really. A PERSON can be smart, rational and caring. PEOPLE as a whole are stupid, insane and self-obsessed. haha what would you say if I told you not everyone is self obsessed? But other wise I agree with that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 6:53 pm
John.D.W. IceintheInk I agree. It's that old saying, really. A PERSON can be smart, rational and caring. PEOPLE as a whole are stupid, insane and self-obsessed. haha what would you say if I told you not everyone is self obsessed? But other wise I agree with that. not everyone is self obsessed. as a whole though.....thats another story. almost like the average of 3, 2938, 293, 29, 210, 2938, 0101, 1003828, 109`2830, 2437656, and 23987530975. im betting its alot larger than lonely little three over there who isnt self obsessed. ha! now there's a nice visual for ya.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:27 pm
emo tazer _cheezlvr4evr_ LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.
Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.
Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.
Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules. second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole. Anarchy - You know what I mean.. sweatdrop It just won't work, period.
And Communism - That's not what I mean. The classroom thing was an example of how the system works. I'm not saying people are better than others at all. It's an attempt to please everybody, but it won't work, simply because of the selfish nature of human beings.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 12:28 pm
_cheezlvr4evr_ emo tazer _cheezlvr4evr_ LAWL, DICTATORSHIP. Jkjk! D: Ew. I'd go with Democracy, followed by Monarchy/Limited Monarchy.
Anarchy would never work, it's like having no rules. So, things like no drinking and driving would be abolished, causing many more drunk driving accidents than there already are, and on top of that, KILLING would be legal, because there aren't any laws stating it is wrong. People are idiots. Someone gets jealous of somebody else because they have a Wii and the other person doesn't? OH LET'S JUST KILL HIM AND STEAL IT! YEAHHH.
Communism, as nice as it sounds, won't work either. That's like saying that in a classroom, everyone is equal and works for each other's grade. The lowest one can get in the class is a C. The kids that get Fs all the time will be happy, and the kids with As will be pissed because they are basically doing work for nothing. Plus, the government really doesn't care what kind of job you get, or what kind of house you live in, because you are all equal. Slackers may be put in huge mansions while hard-working, deserving people get put in shacks because the government controls all of that. And, there is no private property.
Hahah. Yeah. You get the idea. sweatdrop anarchy isnt like no rules, it is no rules. second: communism. it is for the good of the whole, not so smart people seem dumb and dumb people seem smart. youve got it all wrong. its to keep everyone happy, and so no one is 'better' than another. its for the good of the whole. Anarchy - You know what I mean.. sweatdrop It just won't work, period.
And Communism - That's not what I mean. The classroom thing was an example of how the system works. I'm not saying people are better than others at all. It's an attempt to please everybody, but it won't work, simply because of the selfish nature of human beings.the reason a communism would work is that because the people in the communism want it to be a communism and live for the good of the whole. those who want the communism arent selfish.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|